151
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0
« on: June 02, 2020, 03:53 »
0.10 here too.
Shitterstock.com
Shitterstock.com
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: June 02, 2020, 03:53 »
0.10 here too.
Shitterstock.com 152
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 01, 2020, 12:05 »
shitterstock.com
153
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime increasing royalties« on: May 29, 2020, 12:13 »
Uploading now.
Good movement. 154
Shutterstock.com / Re: With new earning structure made by Shutterstock will you disable your portfolio?« on: May 27, 2020, 00:51 »
I'll stop uploading. Two years of hard work and all my workflow designed for them. So...
But I'm new on Stock. I understand you. 155
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 27, 2020, 00:36 »
It's a great capitalist economy lesson doing this during the Covid pandemic.
156
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 26, 2020, 12:43 »
The massive AI rejections showed that they don't want small contributors anymore. Now It's pretty clear with this new movement.
Sad news. I will not upload anymore to them. 157
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 26, 2020, 11:17 »
Not surprising.
158
Shutterstock.com / Re: Missing keywords again« on: May 22, 2020, 10:40 »
Nah.
I'm more worried about the low sales, this month is lower for me on SS than BS f.i. Mi titles are always searchable in worst of cases, so they can delete several kvs on each picture if they like to do it. I'm angry all the time with SS... gonna focus on IS, they take all my stuff and it sells better there, constantly. Not in the past, but I'm dying on SS 159
Shutterstock.com / Re: Missing keywords again« on: May 21, 2020, 04:32 »
Something deliberate, I'm sure.
Don't know the reason, because the KV was added just one time in the keywords, not in the title. The monument has several names, two in English and one in Italian. One of the English names was deleted. Just that kv. 160
Shutterstock.com / Missing keywords again« on: May 21, 2020, 04:28 »
Hi.
I have, again, missing kvs in my pictures. Capital ones, as the main name of the monuments in English. I'm sick of SS. Can't understand this agency. 162
Shutterstock.com / Re: financial district rejections« on: April 28, 2020, 01:25 »
Well, at this point with 80/90 % of rejections It's time for holidays from SS. Gonna focus on IS, AS and AL where I have 100 % of acceptance.
163
Shutterstock.com / Re: financial district rejections« on: April 27, 2020, 01:07 »
These editorial pictures are always in a grey zone.
164
Shutterstock.com / Re: financial district rejections« on: April 25, 2020, 11:45 »I once got a legal letter from the "owners" of La Defence in Paris saying that they needed me to buy a license from them in order to sell photos of that area. I think I told them I had made $10 in my sales and so they didn't push for a retrospective license and I took the images down. This was probably 8 or 10 years back now. Thank you for your answer. Maybe SS has changed their criteria about these buildings for that regulation. The weird thing is that Is has no problems with these pictures, just with the Grande Arche. 165
Shutterstock.com / financial district rejections« on: April 25, 2020, 00:42 »
Hi.
New rejections from skyscrapers and financial district of la Defense. Whole batch of modern architecture from there, many of them unrecognizable reflections and things like that. Quote Content not suitable for licenses: We cannot incorporate this image into our commercial or editorial collection, or we no longer accept this type of content The first time, I have these kind of pictures in mi port in all agencies as editorial. Not the Grande Arche, that always have been rejected on SS and BS, but pictures of skyscrapers, even with logos, always have been accepted on SS as editorial. The rejections are not only close-ups, cityscapes and panoramic ones too. Anyone elese having this kind of problems with urban pictures? 166
General Stock Discussion / Re: frustrated with SOME of the lazy reviewers at shutterstock w/100% rejections« on: April 24, 2020, 11:04 »
Big Stock. It follows the same patterns as SS.
The delay could be just a way to lie us or a way to make us upload slowly. Before this "delay period" my pictures used to be processed in one second. 167
General Stock Discussion / Re: frustrated with SOME of the lazy reviewers at shutterstock w/100% rejections« on: April 24, 2020, 09:38 »
Are you sure there is a human behind the IA? In my batches, when I send them to SS and BS the same pictures are rejected with the same reason.
I'm not sure there is always one person clicking. Looks like sometimes It's automatic, sometimes not. 168
Shutterstock.com / Re: stupid rejection« on: April 24, 2020, 00:51 »
All my pictures are out of focus now. All of them in the other agencies with no problems.
I stop uploading to them. 169
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?« on: April 10, 2020, 13:22 »
I understand you well. I vave tried to get a solid port but I think that now It's more interesting for me to produce some "small art pieces" that tons of pictures, now when I have a lot of them in all companies. In fact, as you say, when I sell these ones with my vision of a monument It's really cool, not the typical tourist shoot. I have a plan. To buy a good cam to my wife to get her vision for our trips (not the compact one that she uses now). 170
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?« on: April 09, 2020, 00:47 »
I have to experiment with my cam, a bit lazy sometimes. When I'm outdoor I'm with my wife sometimes so I don't have a lot of time and use to shoot in the way I feel comfortable (don't want my cam banned on our trips ). When I shoot landscapes I feel in a hurry for the light or the perfect picture that is in my mind and use to shoot too quickly. But I need more time and calm. The good thing of stock (the only one) is that my pictures are much much better now after one year and a half. So I'm happy about that. Maybe I need to think less in the commercial value and the things the costumer would need and more in my technique. Thank you for the tips anyway, the calculators are amazing. 171
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?« on: April 07, 2020, 00:15 »
I have this mental fight, my sweet spot is between 8 and 11 but I like the textures with high f numbers and I use to have grass, snow, wood or sand close to my lens. Maybe in architectural pictures I should use more this sweet spot, I use to shoot with high numbers in facades f.i. I'm still learning, any advice is always welcome. 172
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?« on: April 03, 2020, 01:19 »
Same here. Landscapes with f18.
Sometimes all accepted. Sometimes all rejected for focus and noise. 173
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?« on: March 31, 2020, 01:05 »
I'm pretty worried about the excepcional powers that politicans and policemen have now in my country and in another countries in Europe.
Today I have to go to buy food for 10 days and have to drive 10km to find a mall where can buy all the supplies. If I find a patrol in my route I could be fined because there are not clear rules to my small trip to get food. You can buy food, but they don't say to you where or how and the policemen and soldiers have the right now to fine you with an unkown fine, imposed by other authority by their own criteria with no rules either. In my small village It's imposible to get all the supplies, so the risk could be 300 to 30.000 euros (or even more) if I find an stupid patrol man (a lot of them in traffic patrols, they believe they are Sheriffs). I have a PO box in that village too and have to get my mail. Feel like I'm going to war, because you can't have an argument with the patrols (could be charged with disobedience, a crime). I mean, if they fine me I have to keep my mouth shut, even whether I have the right to buy food and get my mail. 174
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?« on: March 30, 2020, 01:24 »Uncle Pete stands correct. Same to you George. 175
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?« on: March 29, 2020, 13:33 »We ask Germans to do the hard work and put the most cash threatening that else we will dismantle EU. Maybe we should not talk anymore about "the hard job and the germans and the southern countries and the siesta". In all european countries we use to work hard and It's quite insulting. Nobody wants free money, but we can agree that this is a new situation that can test the Union and the behaviour of the members. I can't see any advantage in to leave the countries fall and then rescue them over their economic sovereignty. Anyway, I was joking with the years that have past from Tiananmen or the WWII Apologies for my English. Solidarity: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-portugal/portugal-to-treat-migrants-as-residents-during-coronavirus-crisis-idUSKBN21F0N7 Quote Portugal to treat migrants as residents during coronavirus crisis Regards. |
|