|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Suljo
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30]
726
« on: June 27, 2008, 19:21 »
Isolation
always been problem at iStok,
they always replay with two errors
1st is isolation and second is overfitered or oversaturated but the very thin border border of this is flatt dull colors.
After that when you fix that "problems" they say that image is no stock image???
But not always. They always complain on two complement side so they in that way may dont make mistake for they boss after you eventually complain for that image.
So If you want to complain to someone just try and thats it. (In my language Fart in the Pot)-for better sound.
Anyhow they are want to sell youre audiostreams and they see or hear noise to, over sharpened of overuse of noise programs.
Best one is post of my video rejections to explain them how I do that???
Another way in my language iStock means CATTLE with little teeth.
So how I can explain to my self.
If I am not they exclusive this means that I am not CATTLE.
If you are not CATTLE you have not place in they barn.
727
« on: June 23, 2008, 18:15 »
On the site there is some check box and it is talking about that we (authors or submiters to StockXpert allow them to sell our images throw their own channels)
Is that mean E.G. some one buyer thru Jupiter can buy my image but for microstock price (that is what I see) , But Jupiter from that buyer earn 50, 100, 200 or some this kind of bucks???
728
« on: May 26, 2008, 20:09 »
Does submition targets the vector images too??? Or only images?
729
« on: May 26, 2008, 19:34 »
In my language iSTOC(k)a means Cattle, so I treat they like they treat me. Small vermin bugs which are constantly making my percentage lower and lower. See the new inspectors http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=147&Page=3if that kind of inspector will be soon or shes roll on iStock, for profesional state of view it is absolutely nonsense, but it is good for Us submiters, she will accept enough images to by 2 pairs of shoes in week. Others are soo boring but also more pain in the ass. (Because of shoes) WHATS UP THERE ON iStock?  ? Are they really belive that they can make employee of every creature who are not havent nothig to do and pick it from bus, railway or other station? ?
730
« on: May 24, 2008, 18:17 »
I have few cloudscapes and some interior shoots made with PT gui pro
cool softvare for making panoramic images, also u can changes of view + best thing
makes fine feathe blend with different exposure.
Much better than you got from Canon Photostich software.
Dont know for Nikon
731
« on: May 22, 2008, 18:57 »
I see that threre are new rewievers are at BS. I have 95% aceptance ratio with shity photos but in last 15 or 20 days they rejections are about 30% of uploaded photos which are accepted on SS IS and others.
Has some of you notice that?
Also have first photo in portfolio of about 700 pics rejected for bad keywords precise of too much words which do not corespond to it.
Is it new politics like on CS or ...
732
« on: May 21, 2008, 21:05 »
I am in this beautiful microstock game one year, first on SS than DT and third IS. On IS I am 3 months and everybody which work in vectors know that is best site and rejections in tehnical moment is allways correct, but I am little bit affraid to return them on stupid comments abouth other rejections like : from where is that drawing- which is my own. I work only 2D and 3D vector drawings 15 years and I have more than thousand very various themas and motives. First time I mean that many of them are not applicable for microstocks, but after some time I seen that all is applicable what is artististic and tehnical correct. Result in my mind: when I will have 2 thousends bucks/mt on IS I will go ex. I dont want go on more sites than this three because I mean that they are best and enaugh if you like to know whats metter with your art. peace from Croatia
Hehe nice try but in the croatian language STOK-a means CATTLE and I dont want to do business with Cattle
733
« on: May 20, 2008, 09:13 »
And They dont have referal program for submiters, only for buyers and you got only 5$ for that.
It's actually $10.
It can bee and 100 but so what. too small
734
« on: May 19, 2008, 18:53 »
No way They have stupid rejections on isolations and clipping path. otherways on they site I see stupid isolations. And They dont have referal program for submiters, only for buyers and you got only 5$ for that. What on SS my rerefed photographers make in one day? EVERY DAY
735
« on: May 19, 2008, 18:40 »
What about natural sounds?
They dont need them or I missed something.
736
« on: March 10, 2008, 17:30 »
31278 + 277 = 31555
738
« on: March 08, 2008, 19:41 »
I change my living place and on the new one I am without ADSL for two months only with old Dial up connection so I dont looking whats going on with CanStockPhoto and other low sellers.
So I stopped upload to them, and after this thread I will be lazy to try to upload to them anything.
Maybe I will visit they site when I will bee in pension if they will be exist at that time to withdraw my 200 or 300 bucks for my new silver walking stick with giroscope and GPS or Jetpack.
739
« on: September 26, 2007, 17:36 »
Dont disturb youre self with that.
if you are not exclusive there.
They exclusive player can do what they want, for us they say we can not accept just because.
I know why.
They exclusive players will do it for them after they see what you done so they will make something on variation of youre theme.
740
« on: September 20, 2007, 19:33 »
Blip
Big will always stay big and always want piece of cake.
Bigger an inerten agencies come for crempie.
741
« on: September 20, 2007, 17:33 »
Thera two kinds of people
From Pic business
Oxes and fegets
and I don se any bulls aroud here
Mabe to rude *its from Full metal jacket
But old farters whith old dull cameras sold they snapshots for 300 USD and we cant get in ther game.
Thats it
Its not it for that they sell snapshots with low cost idiot cameras too.
742
« on: September 20, 2007, 17:03 »
He he
I have download some small free pic shooted with Phase One camera, I deteted whole pic on it and paste mine from eos350.
So ipic and exif data are saved from I Phase One, after that just add keywords and so on and that stupid assholles of rewiewers think that I have Phase One and they accept my photo.
I think that they have on they rewiever aplication automatic detection of camera type, so briliant photos from low end cameras never be on reviever eyes, because first filter block you to came to this process.
743
« on: September 20, 2007, 16:19 »
Hi
Mabe they are thinking how to proceed us to old fashioned farters on 35mm cameras.
Or they are holding us while they are been buyed by Getty?
744
« on: September 19, 2007, 18:30 »
Hmmm How to post picture??? I try inser image inside  marks but that didnt work
745
« on: September 19, 2007, 18:25 »
Hi I recive mail from Getty with this picture   whera they say... Only 49$ Wipe the drool from your mouth. Now you can license our royalty-free quality images for a flat rate of $49 / ?49 each*. They’re 72 dpi. Perfect for the web. And they’re available across all royalty-free creative stills collections, including our premier offerings, immediately! This isn’t a sale or a limited offer. It’s forever. So get in there! I replay to them with Hi This image is over filtered or saturated from original image For more information about iStock Standards, please visit: http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_1.0_account.phpedit: fixed your link
746
« on: July 24, 2007, 17:44 »
Hm
Mabe I miss something but when I try upload Ill 8.0 eps format my files are unknown format, only ai files but that not good idea.
Previews are rasterized in RGB colors and that is bad because its not real colors???
Who will buy radioactive flags or anything.
If I am buyer Ill never buy my illustrations or any else because they looks awfully from RGB prew in ai format.
Whats you're opinion?
Forget this if they accepting ill 8. eps format
Dario
747
« on: July 23, 2007, 19:11 »
I'm curious- I talk to people everyday about photography and design. There are ebbs and flows to every industry, but as a group we seem to have gotten over the hump of people giving 'microstock' respect. The heated debates between macro and micro still happen, but the conversation seems to have drifted to the two living in harmony. I don't really care.
Lately I've noticed more companies embracing the term 'microstock' to define their service or product. My question is, what does 'microstock' mean now? Are there specific characteristics? Community? Price point?
My first replay on forum but I don't know if I do it all right. lets begin I'm working in company on DTP and DTR for licenced Elle, Elle Decor, few times for National Geographic, Croatian issue, and I must to tell you that these 90% of photographers cannot pass basic microstock test, I mean IS, SS and SExp. They are on pay list and they don't WANT to know anything about any Noise, artifacting or so on (for them its cool). Also they don't want to know nothing about microStock because they thing that every of they picture cost xxx USD or XXXXXXX USD. If you want more let me know to tell other details to remove mask from HIGH photographers and HIGH companies.
748
« on: July 22, 2007, 18:40 »
Hi
I don't understand why is bigstok in big 5 or 6, for me 123 is better.
i join on big in september 06 and on 123 in January 07 with same portfolio
* booth of them accept everything but on 123rf i have 120$ and on big 80$.
Has any of you have similar experience?
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
