MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - JustAnImage
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
201
« on: November 10, 2022, 13:07 »
Michael, I wouldn't take that too seriously. If the only person here, who apparently has all day time to flood the forum with contributions, receives zero approval for it and then calls all others trolls - that speaks volumes. Annoying just a bit to read here. Is at the moment somehow groundhog day here: stoker2014, stoker2014 ..... Don't worry - I've probably been out of the age where this upsets me for a while :-) It's more like an annoying squeak under the shoe and somehow also amusing.
202
« on: November 10, 2022, 10:47 »
Sry - double post
203
« on: November 10, 2022, 10:46 »
I can give more than one
I'm waiting for a link. Or are you a liar!
Someone's education has definitely failed - throwing around accusations and insults like 'liar' should actually be enough for a ban, shouldn't it? Have a nice day@All
204
« on: November 10, 2022, 08:26 »
Just 2 days ago a simple sand ground sold for $18,59 - liked that one :-)
205
« on: October 18, 2022, 12:24 »
Thank you for letting us know :-)
206
« on: October 12, 2022, 17:45 »
Perhaps a little calculation will help to assess how to value the $8 offer for the Free Collection (just crossed my mind):
For photos, $5 is offered in the Free Collection with a minimum sale price of $0.33-$0.38 depending on account status - so about a 13:1 ratio ( 5 / 0.38 = 13.15).
If we now extrapolate the $8 in the Free Collection offer for videos to the minimum price for videos, which as far as I know is $2.80, this should actually result in a 13:1 ratio for the video offer of $2.80*13 = $36.40 per Free Video. (If the $2.80 is not the minimum price for videos, please correct me here).
So the $8 seems like a very bad deal to me...
Don't get me wrong, AS is certainly one of the better platforms for us providers, but this offer is not a good one.
207
« on: October 11, 2022, 11:11 »
In principle, I find the FreeCollection offers quite good, but $8 for a video clip does not seem to me to be in proportion to $5 for a photo. I will definitely not participate in this programme with my videos.
208
« on: September 27, 2022, 15:00 »
In my case, 0 out of 31 illustrations were selected - I could have saved myself the time of considering whether to submit all or just some for the free collection. Quite disappointing...
209
« on: September 15, 2022, 16:42 »
This is completely nuts...
210
« on: August 30, 2022, 17:35 »
Thanks Mat,of course you are right - i didn't double check that.
Some illustrations with downloads have not been nominated :-)
211
« on: August 29, 2022, 17:07 »
If I am not wrong, all illustrations which had sales between 1 and 4 in the last 12 month have been selected to be 'valid' for the free collection.
Those selected images will be reviewed and if some of those will be selected, you will get $5 for each selected image. The selected images will then be free to download for 1 year at Adobe Stock.
212
« on: August 20, 2022, 18:03 »
The swing from June to July was -$200 for me, or 50% less than June. $400 to $200.
Good to know it wasn't only me with a huge drop for July ... July compared to June was 27% - $250 to $68 Only Februrary was worse with $62.
213
« on: August 08, 2022, 07:58 »
This year I had 800 foto sales so far with and RPD of $0,294... - 1 sale for $21 - about 25 sales (on demand) in the range $1-$3 - about 750 sales in the range of $0,10-$0,50 (603 sales for $0,10)
Only 15 video sales are not enough to give stable numbers, RPD of $8,62 - Numbers were; $3,12 - $9,38 - $1,53 - $11,85 - $7,43 - $8,85 - $1,25 - $2,36 - $5,09 - $26,85 - $1,40 - $23,58 - $0,80 - $5,85 - $19,98
Sidenote: with the same video portfolio I had only in June on IStock: 28 Video sales for $204,56 (RPD $7,31)
214
« on: August 08, 2022, 06:39 »
My little numbers: - 2022 (Jan - Jul) - $228,52 - 781 sales - rpd $0,29 (Portfolio ~ 22.2k images) - 2021 (Jan - Jul) - $188,49 - 489 sales - rpd $0,39 (Portfolio ~ 16.6k images) - 2020 (Jan - Jul) - $203,27 - 352 sales - rpd $0,58 (Portfolio ~ 11.8k images)
215
« on: August 02, 2022, 15:11 »
Are any of you guys experienced massive buyout and refunds after some time? In last 1-2 months I've sold video clips for over $2k at Dreamstime. All of them were refunded of course with their crappy automated message. I bet that all those files will land on some pirate site. This month started the same. Someone with stolen credit card "buiyng" and massive downloading clips.
I had this "sales and refund" with videos at the start of the year, somewhere around February and had a discussion with the support. At the end they said "If someone uses stolen credit cards, they have downloaded the files but they are of course not allowed to use the videos."... ridiculous and useless as a contributor.
216
« on: July 31, 2022, 10:30 »
Anybody having the similar lower sales on Adobe Stock during previous 3 weeks like me?
Yes, i had the same low numbers on AS during the last 3-4 weeks - about 50-70% of the 'normal' sales.
How about this most recent week? Did you have 3 weeks dip and then back to normal like I did this week?
This week was a liitle bit better then the previous 3 weeks, so yes - 3 weeks almost only low sales and not many, last week some more sales and for a better rpd again.
217
« on: July 31, 2022, 08:32 »
Anybody having the similar lower sales on Adobe Stock during previous 3 weeks like me?
Yes, i had the same low numbers on AS during the last 3-4 weeks - about 50-70% of the 'normal' sales.
218
« on: July 27, 2022, 08:21 »
I already sent a message to their support... maybe there is a chance to get a 'standard answer' ;-)
Well, they didn't sell a lot before this problem but since the watermark is gone I had 0 sales.
219
« on: July 18, 2022, 05:02 »
Got the paypal email about the Canva payment just 10 minutes ago
220
« on: July 14, 2022, 08:23 »
Any information about 123rf having sale reporting problems again? - I do not have one sale in July, which is at least very unlikely - the images of the "Downloads of the last 30 days" don't even show images anymore and are not clickable
Is it just me?
221
« on: July 06, 2022, 05:29 »
Hello Evaristo, Thank you for the detailed answer. You obviously have a deeper understanding of neural networks than I do - I've only been working on programming them for about a year in my own environment (without Tensorflow or Keras). Short answer to your questions: Yes, I train the networks exclusively with my own photos that don't require rights clearance or of which I have the rights clearance - it's just hard to add a few thousand reference photos as attachments when uploading The website is a great example and I am familiar with the GAN networks - but my own NN environment is not yet that far advanced. I'll wait and see how things develop with the "AI images" on the stock market - something should happen very soon, because I think the topic is becoming very acute. For the creation of such images, I don't want to be dependent on another system later on, so that I don't have to ask for permission - hence the programming of my own environment. Translated with DeepL.com
222
« on: July 03, 2022, 12:52 »
... So the human eye that you generate with GAN it is arguably. It is not generated with a 3d SW like c4d, blender, Maya or Zbrush but with AI-Gan since the stitches, blur and merge are an evidence in the image (typical artifacts from GAN merge pictures) not to mention the missing of eyelashes. Thanks for your answer - it seems to be a complicated case, all this AI stuff will for sure be a problem in the near future. What I would like to point out is, that the eye is not a stitched images (sorry, i hope i can find the right words - my english is not that good). The eye is generated by a formula trained by lots of eyes, but to generate this eye, not a single pixel of the original images is used. It is just a formula with about 70.000 variables. The "stitches" are mathematical gradient boundary of the non linearity in the formula and not edges of images stitching.
223
« on: July 03, 2022, 09:53 »
If the images are created by referencing other images, you may have a copyright issue. Be sure to do a reverse image search to check for visible similarities.
Thanks, a good idea to do a reverse search to see if there are similar images. The AI creates images from my very own images database and the results are a mathematical mixture of parameters of that images, extracted and transported via a neural network to a new created image.
224
« on: July 02, 2022, 11:00 »
@JoAnn: Thanks for your answer. The problem with the reference images is, that there isn't a single reference image creating the eye - it is the resulting formula of thousands of images training the AI to create an eye.
And yes, a property release stating that I am using a self-developed software would be the best I can do.
Maybe I should just try to upload one of those create images as illustration and see what happens? :-)
225
« on: July 02, 2022, 08:50 »
Hello together,
I am currently facing the question of how I should upload images generated by an AI to AdobeStock?
Brief background: I program neural networks myself without external libraries and without external image data. These generate stylized images (see examples below). (This is not that very nice Dall e 2-AI, it is completely my own)
Are such images photo or illustration? Do I need a model release and where should I get it from, since there is no model? Or a property release? I would then have to have my computer sign it...
What do you think?
And before I get into trouble, I thought I'd throw this question out there.
I would be interested in your opinion and of course an official statement, how Adobe would like it :-)
Michael
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|