MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - modellocate

Pages: 1 2 [3]
51
iStockPhoto.com / Downloads per month
« on: September 14, 2007, 15:54 »
What is a high number of downloads per month? What should I shoot for?

My best image is 6/month, and my second best only 2/month...

I've tried to look for the most popular images, but that feature was offline...

What has everyone else experienced for dl/m?

52
iStockPhoto.com / Tools or techniques for checking image defects?
« on: September 05, 2007, 22:22 »
Anyone know of automated ways to check an image for defects? I know IS has at least once told me how to check an image in Photoshop for a specific defect... I wonder if they have tools or suite of tests that trigger red flags and if something similar is available to us.

53
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The curse of overfiltering
« on: September 05, 2007, 22:16 »
I also think it depends on who is reviewing the image. No matter how good the training is, it is subjective and a border-line image may be accepted by one and rejected by another.

Just an educated guess; I've run sites with moderators/reviewers and consistency is always an issue.

54
Shutterstock.com / Re: Tips on shutterstock acceptance?
« on: August 31, 2007, 09:37 »
Thanks for the exposure tips. I never do commercial stuff -- my real photography is for artwork, so the rules are different. Microstock is an attempt to learn something new.

I did neglect my light meter when I started to work digital, I will dust it off and put it back into action.

What I had been doing is exposing until the highlights burned out, and then reducing the exposure to bring them back in. I think more even lighting is going to be key.

Right now I use 3 light positions:
* strong side light, 3 strobes (450w/s total) behind an 8'x8' diffuser (about 30-40 degrees stage left from the model)
* Fill light, soft box fill (300w/s) (about 5 degrees left/right from strait on the model)
* background light on a boom, sometimes with a gel (150w/s) about 2 feet above the frame, about 2 feet from the background.

The above is comprised of a 600ws 4-strobe Novatron system, and a 300 ws mono-light.

My studio dimensions are 20x25 feet, really too small; making good even lighting a challenge. Ceiling is a generous 17 feet.

55
General Stock Discussion / Re: Nikon or Canon?
« on: August 30, 2007, 14:49 »
Hi. Any experience with DX lenses? I just started shooting D2XS after years of film+Nikon Prime lenses... I thought maybe I'd try a zoom lens... 17-55 DX and 35-70 2.8 G... both highly rated, and fairly pricey... but...

I'm now considering going back to prime lenses for sharpness demanded by stock.

Thoughts?

56
Shutterstock.com / Re: Tips on shutterstock acceptance?
« on: August 30, 2007, 14:21 »
Thanks for all the feedback! Not sure I deserve "very good" but thanks anyway.

I don't think the D2Xs is particularly noisy, as Nikon's premier DSLR it better not be ;)

I have often wondered about why anyone would pay for an up-sampled image, since they can just do that themselves -- upsampling adds no image data, and thus no value that I can see -- but that's a different topic.

With some luck I should be on SS when I try again in 30 days (or 60, 90 without as much luck!)

57
Shutterstock.com / Tips on shutterstock acceptance?
« on: August 30, 2007, 11:26 »
Hi. I'd like to hear from people who have been accepted to Shutterstock (I'm trying). I've been on istock for quite some time-- but SS is a bit more difficult.

First attempt Nikon Coolpix 8700 (not the best camera, I know) 6 of 10 accepted -- I was hopeful, needing only 1 more to make it.

Next attempt Nikon D2Xs (this should do it, I thought) -- 0 of 10 accepted! Mostly for noise issues...I had shot them at the highest quality JPG, but not raw...

I only submitted images that were selling very well on IS.

My next attempt, i will use similar images, but be sure to shoot in raw (NEF) format to reduce noise, I will also try to choose more dramatic images, and shoot with prime lenses...I will also try to avoid any images that look like pinup...

Another major change I will make is to downsample my 12.5 MP images to increase the apparent quality.

Here are what my shots look like: http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&userID=667505

Any other suggestions on being accepted?

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors