151
General Stock Discussion / Re: your most laughable rejection
« on: July 11, 2008, 12:13 »
did they suggest pluck and resubmit ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
General Stock Discussion / Re: your most laughable rejection« on: July 11, 2008, 12:13 »
did they suggest pluck and resubmit ?
152
Shutterstock.com / Re: 1/3 of the month and it's looking good so far« on: July 11, 2008, 11:47 »
SS prefers that ones uploads at least once a week. My second month at SSwas $198, simply because I uploaded all the images I had then (around 700) and I was uploading almost every day. Recently i did not upload for almost 2 months and the result was $69 for June. For the past 7 days I uploaded 40 images and already earned $50 in July.
153
Adobe Stock / Re: Rejections, rejections, rejections...« on: July 11, 2008, 11:13 »
I wonder ... there was Chode from Bosnia having thousands of images on FT, he disappeared and now it is Peter also from Bosnia ...
154
Adobe Stock / Re: Rejections, rejections, rejections...« on: July 11, 2008, 10:41 »
No. my rank is very low and at least 50%-%70 are accepted.
155
General Stock Discussion / Re: No complaints!« on: July 10, 2008, 17:42 »
Dr. MIZ will come to your rescue soon, I guess.
156
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia search - still problems« on: July 10, 2008, 17:07 »
the conciseness of FT dictionary appalls me. Who is the devil creator of it?
157
General Stock Discussion / Re: Lifetime Microstock Goals« on: July 10, 2008, 11:58 »
$1000 a month and solving the tedious part of uploading. I hate that I have to spend 4 hours to upload 10 images to 8 sites.
158
General Stock Discussion / Re: FACTOID Copyright registrations - WARNING...this is a MIZ posted thread« on: July 09, 2008, 22:37 »
you become part of the microstock universe, and the universe became part of you. in that generous exchange someone commended you, as expected.
159
Alamy.com / Re: RF - Alamy and others« on: July 09, 2008, 22:04 »
thanks, madelaide. I did not grasp the difference before.
160
General Stock Discussion / Re: FACTOID Copyright registrations - WARNING...this is a MIZ posted thread« on: July 09, 2008, 21:42 »
congrats, MIZ!
161
SnapVillage.com / Re: NEWS - Ivan Purdie on SnapVillage« on: July 09, 2008, 19:05 »
When I saw him, I wondered if he would be able to sell ice cream to kids.
162
Alamy.com / Re: RF - Alamy and others« on: July 09, 2008, 18:53 »
thanks epixx!. I am trying to find for myself a different avenue, other than food images. It has to be either editorial images or some creative PS stuff. But I can't read PS manuals, I tried several times; a torture ... Now I got, thanks to this thread, a better idea of editorial images. I have canon 40D and it is bulky to carry around. Of course, I have to decide eventually.
163
StockXpert.com / Re: Please improve lighting/exposure???« on: July 09, 2008, 18:15 »
Is is not possible to fix exposure in PS, without the need to return back to a shooting location? Especially, if the location is on some other continent.
164
General Stock Discussion / Re: FACTOID Copyright registrations - WARNING...this is a MIZ posted thread« on: July 09, 2008, 17:47 »
indeed, a person ambidextrously versed in both arts (one revealing and one concealing) will be your best bet, MIZ.
165
iStockPhoto.com / Re: 2 New istock lightboxes - Warm Beverages & Birds« on: July 09, 2008, 17:27 »
why not something like flowers, kids, or sea.
166
Alamy.com / Re: RF - Alamy and others« on: July 09, 2008, 17:07 »
I made a search on Alamy "Philadelphia". I see some images marked as L and some as RF. Where are editorial images ?
167
General Stock Discussion / Re: FACTOID Copyright registrations - WARNING...this is a MIZ posted thread« on: July 09, 2008, 16:03 »
most of the things you write MIZ are very funny.
168
Shutterstock.com / Re: reaching 500usd« on: July 09, 2008, 15:52 »
hire an assistant to upload images. SS needs constant feeding.
169
General Stock Discussion / Re: FACTOID Copyright registrations - WARNING...this is a MIZ posted thread« on: July 09, 2008, 15:47 »This pertains to United States Federal Laws (Not world wide) 170
Adobe Stock / Re: Rejections, rejections, rejections...« on: July 09, 2008, 13:49 »
it seems that they reject at least half of the images submitted.
8864102 07-09-2008 08:09 pm Fotolia - Photograph selected New Message 8864101 07-09-2008 08:09 pm Fotolia - Photograph Declined - Similar Photograph New Message 8864100 07-09-2008 08:09 pm Fotolia - Photograph selected New Message 8864099 07-09-2008 08:09 pm Fotolia - Photograph Declined - Type of photograph New Message 8863818 07-09-2008 07:48 pm Fotolia - Photograph Declined - Type of photograph New Message 8863817 07-09-2008 07:48 pm Fotolia - Photograph Declined - Type of photograph New Message 8863814 07-09-2008 07:48 pm Fotolia - Photograph selected New Message 8857996 07-09-2008 04:46 pm Fotolia - Photograph Declined - Similar Photograph New Message 8857992 07-09-2008 04:46 pm Fotolia - Photograph selected New Message 8857852 07-09-2008 04:44 pm Fotolia - Photograph selected New Message 171
General Stock Discussion / Re: How important is copyspace?« on: July 09, 2008, 12:59 »
I do not find that it matters for food images.
172
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Keyword wiki - is it possible to complain?« on: July 09, 2008, 12:54 »I am sure many of us have had our keywords or even description and category omitted by a reviewer.Just shooting and submitting may be not enough nowadays. I think the market for images is oversaturated already and only people with PS skills and talented illustrators can hope to make real money from microstock. I think also that people with established portfolios may not be loosing much due to oversaturation since customers return. 173
Alamy.com / Re: RF - Alamy and others« on: July 09, 2008, 11:17 »
no model released needed, right ?
174
Alamy.com / Re: RF - Alamy and others« on: July 09, 2008, 11:09 »
What is an Editorial image? It seems I have a very vague idea only.
175
SnapVillage.com / Re: NEWS - Ivan Purdie on SnapVillage« on: July 08, 2008, 14:45 »
his casual adversing skills did not impress me.
|
|