351
Adobe Stock / Re: OFFICIALLY NO ITIN REQUIRED WITH FOTOLIA!!!!!!
« on: January 06, 2010, 15:59 »Well done Denis. You are a star __ take a heart for your trouble too!
Thank you gostwyck
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 351
Adobe Stock / Re: OFFICIALLY NO ITIN REQUIRED WITH FOTOLIA!!!!!!« on: January 06, 2010, 15:59 »Well done Denis. You are a star __ take a heart for your trouble too! Thank you gostwyck 352
Adobe Stock / Re: OFFICIALLY NO ITIN REQUIRED WITH FOTOLIA!!!!!!« on: January 06, 2010, 15:53 »actually there is a simpler way. I am canadian and I went through this process before with SS a few months ago and the IRS would not take my SIN. Denis 353
Adobe Stock / Re: OFFICIALLY NO ITIN REQUIRED WITH FOTOLIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!« on: January 06, 2010, 15:51 »Denis I think you made my day my friend! Thank you Giuseppe 354
Adobe Stock / OFFICIALLY NO ITIN REQUIRED WITH FOTOLIA!!!!!!« on: January 06, 2010, 15:35 »
06/01/2010 21:29
ModeratorWE WANT OUR W7 LETTERHi All, good news, as it stands right now, no ITIN will be needed for treaty to apply, therefor the W8ben form will be sufficient for the treaty to apply, so the vast majority should have a 0% or a very low withholding rate. Just submit your W8 forms correctly and wait for validation. Once your W8 form has been validated, you'll be done. A refund for the taken taxes so far will apply to each account within the next few days. we will soon make an official announcement. Check blog and forums later on. I hope you are all happy campers now Daniela Director, Fotolia United Kingdom http://www.fotolia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=24454 Denis 355
Adobe Stock / Re: No need for an ITIN number with fotolia or any other site« on: January 06, 2010, 14:29 »
I think that it is just a matter of time before Fotolia do it without ITIN. The following is a response I got from Daniela, Fotolia UK Director and my response thereafter:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that if Fotolia are forced to send us signed letters by mail that it will force them to reconsider the cost of mailing letters to everybody versus doing it without ITIN number. Can you imagine how time consuming it would be if all of a sudden they had to send us signed letters non-stop. Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, Denis, must be sent by mail - PDF is not sufficient But please have a little patience and we will give you all the info you'll need. Very shortly, I promise. Daniela Director, Fotolia United Kingdom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is great news Now as you can see doing it without ITIN numbers would be far more efficient and cost effective. Sharpshot has found the following very important info the other day: >>>>>>>>>>> I found this from one of the sites that doesn't ask for an ITIN. "The reason that we are different is that **** ****** has invested in structuring our business in a manner that simplifies this for our non U.S. artists. We have applied, and been approved, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service a certain business status that allows us to provide treaty benefits to non U.S. tax residents without the additional requirement of an ITIN or EIN." So there you are Fotolia, all you have to do is work with the IRS to save thousands of your contributors money and time spent on this. One site I use had this done in a few weeks and no tax was withheld while they sorted it out. I expect the same treatment here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you again for your effort http://www.fotolia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=24454 Denis 356
Adobe Stock / Re: We have got to take legal action against fotolia!« on: January 06, 2010, 08:07 »
I believe that if Fotolia are forced to send us signed letters by mail that it will force them to reconsider the cost of mailing letters to everybody versus doing it without ITIN number. Can you imagine how time consuming it would be if all of a sudden they had to send us signed letters non-stop. Denis
357
Adobe Stock / Re: We have got to take legal action against fotolia!« on: January 05, 2010, 20:19 »a good point is made in the neighbor thread - if Fotolia persists on ITIN they will have to male paper letters to everyone; and this wouldn't be cheap when multiplied thousands times. The above mention thread has changed. Daniela is checking to see if a PDF file is acceptable with the IRS. Until then we are to request the W7 letter by mail. (http://www.fotolia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=24454): Denis 358
Adobe Stock / Re: No need for an ITIN number with fotolia or any other site« on: January 05, 2010, 17:57 »^^ Looks like they are sending the letter as PDF with 'hand written' signature. If that satisfies IRS (and I guess it will), then that is easy to automate and hence cut the costs to almost 0 (long term). I know from personal experience that a printed W7 letter from another well known stock agency got my ITIN application rejected a few months ago. However, I must say that it was not a PDF file therefore it may or may not work, I don't know? The last time it cost me over $100.00 to have documents certified and shipped only to have the application rejected 6 weeks later because the W7 letter was not original. In addition, the IRS don't return your documents if they are rejected (unless it is an original passport) therefore you have to start all over again if rejected!!! At that time, with the other agency, while waiting for my ITIN application to be approved, they found a way to do without the ITIN number and be in full compliance with the IRS. Although my ITIN application was eventually rejected, it was no longer required. At that time I did not care anymore about loosing over $100.00 as I though this ITIN saga was finally behind us. Well today I wish I had the application approved. I am reluctant regarding spending money towards a non-original W7 letter. I am not saying this is not gonna work but can you imagine if they had mass rejections how mad this would make Fotolia members. I am still willing to use the pdf file but before sending it I will wait the results of the first ones sent as I am sure we will hear about it. Denis 359
Adobe Stock / Re: No need for an ITIN number with fotolia or any other site« on: January 05, 2010, 14:35 »So this almost sounds like there really isn't any legal reference that we could quote that would kind of force FT to not require ITIN. It is just a special arrangement with IRS and no one knows on what exactly it is based and whether FT does not want to or cannot make it. To me it sounds like FT have to figure out the cost of mailing signed W7 letters to everybody that requires it for an ITIN number versus the cost of doing it without ITIN. If they go with the ITIN then they will have to continuously send signed W7 letters non-stop. If they figure how to do it without ITIN like SS then they don't have to send letters. I think it is a matter of how much will this cost on the long term and which one of this two options will cost less. One option is time consuming and the other is not. I think history will repeat itself and they will eventually find a way without ITIN. Denis 360
General Stock Discussion / Re: I have a gift for you :)« on: January 05, 2010, 07:50 »
Thank you Laflor...very useful. You have a wonderful port.....I am jealous. No doubt in my mind...you will be very successful
Take care Denis 361
Shutterstock.com / Re: Any SS EL's today?« on: January 04, 2010, 17:56 »
SS ROCKS Amongst all micros, SS is the most stable, reliable, helpful, friendly, easy, modest and supportive site of them all. Sure there are a few minor issues.... but these minor issues are nothing compare to the other sites. On the money side, for me IS is first most of the time and SS second. Denis
363
Off Topic / Re: Merry Christmas everyone« on: December 24, 2009, 20:28 »
Merry Christmas to all
Denis 364
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 23, 2009, 14:08 »The following was posted at Fotolia without the links: I just got a response from Fotolia support indicating that the above mention evidences against the ITIN requirements were sent to their tax advisors for review. Denis 365
Microstock Services / Re: Microstock Co-Op For and By Photographers« on: December 23, 2009, 12:38 »Our savior! I though he was supposed to be borned on Dec 25th? 366
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 21, 2009, 21:27 »Oh Cybernesco! No I don't have anything positive so far. This was my last post to them: "Inevitably Fotolia has only two choices: Either send us the required W7 letter so that we can get the TIN or find a way to do it without TIN like the other sites. So far, after three weeks none of those two options have been realised. So what is going on? Denis 367
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 21, 2009, 11:29 »Anyone here with fotolia and and other stock sites who have had to do the tax thing can they please let me know on here how the other sites dealt with it. Hello Warren, I am at my full time work right now and strangely the firewall prevent me from getting into Fotolia's forum, but I am able to write here. Anyway, I just found this IRS "2009 publication 515" which is basically a 57 pages guideline for withholding agents such as Fotolia. It provides detail instructions about withholding issues for the agencies. We can have a glimpse at the other side of the medal regarding their obligations ect... I haven't read it yet. I am just about to have a quick look. If anybody find something interesting let us know. Denis http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p515.pdf 368
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 20, 2009, 13:02 »
The following was posted at Fotolia without the links:
After the holidays, I will definitely contact the IRS and get more details about the ITIN issue. So far I have found the following strong evidences that an ITIN is not required. The following is a small part of a published letter for which the link will be posted at MG. This letter is from a US organisation called the Chair of SIFMAs Committee on Tax Compliance and Administration and requested by an IRS officer to make recommendations and comments about drafting a new updated version of Form W-8BEN instructions. Only the most important lines were kept: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Glenn Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer Internal Revenue Service, Room 6512 1111 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20224 Re: Request for Comments on Draft Form W-8BEN and Instructions for Form W-8BEN Dear Mr. Kirkland: The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on recently released drafts of Form W-8BEN and Instructions for Form W-8BEN. We respectfully request IRS consideration of the following suggested changes to the form and instructions. Line 6 o The instructions for this section begin by saying that an individual is generally required to enter his/her social security number (SSN) on Line 6 of Form W-8BEN. To the contrary, most non-resident aliens do not have an SSN and are not required to provide any type of U.S. taxpayer identification number (TIN) on a Form W-8BEN. The instructions should instead start with the general rule that a TIN is not required to obtain a reduced rate or exemption from US withholding. Then the instructions should explain when a TIN is required and how to obtain one. Otherwise, foreign investors would likely get the impression that a TIN is required. the Chair of SIFMAs Committee on Tax Compliance and Administration http://www.sifma.org/regulatory/comment_letters/47326787.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As well, the following paragraph was found within the W-8BEN instructions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Expiration of Form W-8BEN. Generally, a Form W-8BEN provided without a U.S. taxpayer identification number (TIN) will remain in effect for a period starting on the date the form is signed and ending on the last day of the third succeeding calendar year, unless a change in circumstances makes any information on the form incorrect. For example, a Form W-8BEN signed on September 30, 2005, remains valid through December 31, 2008. A Form W-8BEN furnished with a U.S. TIN will remain in effect until a change in circumstances makes any information on the form incorrect, provided that the withholding agent reports on Form 1042-S at least one payment annually to the beneficial owner who provided the Form W-8BEN. See the instructions for line 6 beginning on page 4 for circumstances under which you must provide a U.S. TIN. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/iw8ben.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a doubt after reading the above mention, the only difference between having a TIN and not having one is the expiry date, and not withholding issues. Therefore, could Fotolia point us to the proper IRS directive indicating that they have the right to withhold 30% after our W-8BEN have been validated without TIN? This only reasonable. Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears from the evidences above that it is the IRS instructions that are badly written and put everybody in a confusing state. I hope eventually that Fotolia will speak to the right tax expert. Denis 370
Software - General / Re: Windows 7« on: November 23, 2009, 10:40 »
I have dual drives, so I have done a clean install of W7 Home Premium 64 bits on the second drive while keeping Vista Home Premium 64 bits on the first, which, thereafter, the computers bios menu automatically gave me the choice on which OS to boot. I had a copy of Photoshop CS4 on both drives. This way, I could figure under which OS, Photoshop CS4 was the most performing with the same computer. To me the performance of my Wacom tablet under CS4 was the most important point in deciding which OS I was going to keep.
After flawlessly going through the initial W7 installation, getting all updates and installing Norton Antivirus, I let W7 decide which driver to install for all my hardware. W7 had Microsoft driver versions for all my components, nvidia 9800, Wacom tablet, Canon printer, ect.. After this was all done, at first, everything appeared to work goodhowever after trying CS4, I was not so sure anymore. Under CS4, the Wacom tablet pen was very sluggish, very slow to respond and definitely much worst then CS4 under Vista. As well, panning and smooth zooming were no longer working as it did under Vista. Under CS4 preferences, the video card open GL option was greyed out and could not be activated as in Vista which is required for the panning and smooth zooming. I figured that the provided Microsoft nvidia driver was probably the culprit. From the nvidia website I got their own driver specifically for W7 64 bits. Bingo, open GL got activated and thereafter, panning and smooth zooming was back. But, the Wacom tablet pen was still very sluggish and slow to respond. Again, maybe the provided Microsoft Wacom driver was the culprit. From Wacom website I got the driver. This time, not Bingo, still sluggish and slow to respond. To me, if this problem could not be resolved , I was ditching W7 and keeping Vista. After spending all afternoon trying to figure this out without success, I re-uploaded the Wacom driver from the Wacom website and this time Bingo.it works. It went from worst then Vista to much better then Vista just because of a couple drivers. To make a long story short. When changing OS, always try to get drivers from the original companies where your hardware are from before using the Microsoft ones. Everything is now much faster then Vista, from booting to shutting it down as well as much better performance with CS4 and the Wacom tablet pen which is a big plus for me. Denis 371
StockXpert.com / Re: Anybody else taking over 8 days to get paid from StockXpert?« on: November 13, 2009, 15:14 »372
StockXpert.com / Re: Anybody else taking over 8 days to get paid from StockXpert?« on: November 13, 2009, 09:58 »Too early to worry about. Just check your preferences for possible mistakes in payout section. My preference is set on paypal as it always been since the beginning. Denis 373
StockXpert.com / Re: Anybody else taking over 8 days to get paid from StockXpert?« on: November 12, 2009, 20:03 »I've been waiting since Nov. 2. I wrote support and they replied today. That is good news...thank you Lisa 374
StockXpert.com / Re: Anybody else taking over 8 days to get paid from StockXpert?« on: November 12, 2009, 15:56 »I'm guessing either timing or a glitch in the system. I requested payment the evening of the 31st and had my Paypal notification on the 2nd. Yes that was typical timing for me as well. I am sure nothing is lost as the amount owed has not been subtracted from the total yet and still in pending mode so I guess this could be some kind of a glitch. Denis 375
StockXpert.com / Anybody else taking over 8 days to get paid from StockXpert?« on: November 12, 2009, 15:45 »
I have been with StockXpert since the beginning and they always paid through paypal within a couple of days, sometimes within a couple hours. Not this time, the request for payment was sent Nov 3, it is almost 9 complete days now and nothing yet. I did send an email to support 18 hours ago and no reply yet. At the moment, I am just mildly concerned and just wondering if this has become the norm? Anybody else out there taking that long? Thanks for responding. Denis
|
|