|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dhav
Pages: [1]
1
« on: December 09, 2022, 05:39 »
@mat
Wondering if you could shed some more light on the model/property release guidelines. I submitted some ai images which show a generic face. Sent a property release with these (following the guidelines) but they were rejected for the reason that they need a model release?
If a generative AI image is submitted with what could be perceived as a recognizable person in it, then you must submit a release no matter what.
If the person represented in the image is based on a real human, either via text prompt or image prompt, then a model release is required.
If the person is completely fictional and made up through generic text prompts not based on real people, then a property release is required.
@Dhav, will you please provide me with an image number as an example of a compliant file rejected in error? I would like to take a look. It's possible the release is non-compliant with our requirements.
This is a new and evolving process for us, so your patience is very much appreciated.
thank you,
Mat Hayward
Hi @mat Probably just me not understanding correctly but I submitted an ai portrait with a model release and that was rejected also. I think am example model release would be really helpful to see how we correctly fill them out.
2
« on: December 08, 2022, 11:05 »
@mat
Wondering if you could shed some more light on the model/property release guidelines. I submitted some ai images which show a generic face. Sent a property release with these (following the guidelines) but they were rejected for the reason that they need a model release?
3
« on: September 13, 2022, 16:59 »
I have been having lots of rejections recently of editorial images. I thought nothing of it and have kept shooting other commerical subjects that get accepted. This week I have been in London covering the tributes to Queen Elizabeth in Green Park and Buckingham Palace. These are current news editorial images, yet the whole batch have been rejected for not meeting editorial guidelines. I really cannot work out why these would be rejected.
Anyone got any ideas? have Adobe changed their editorial policy? or know how to contact Mat Hayward to understand a bit more.
Thanks
4
« on: February 09, 2021, 05:26 »
Hi! Looks like the earnings on 123RF are get calculated "total + last month" which makes the amount shown in M+ unrealistic high. I wish though it was true 
Ive had this issue for a long time. 123 always shows the incorrect value from a previous month on microstock plus.
5
« on: November 13, 2020, 09:35 »
Ok. sounds like its legit!
6
« on: November 13, 2020, 05:34 »
Hi all I have come across this site selling wall murals. All watermarked images from different agencies. https://www.sandhills.ie/beach-wallpapersDoes anyone know who to contact about this! Thanks
7
« on: September 25, 2020, 08:30 »
Hello
Im getting a few files that have a "submitted but missing tag" mainly on dreamstime. Is this an error? Should I just resubmit them.
Thanks
8
« on: July 01, 2020, 07:45 »
Ah Ha! I should have looked harder. Thanks
9
« on: June 30, 2020, 08:13 »
Hi. Would it be possible to add uploading illustrative editorial option for Adobe?
10
« on: May 04, 2020, 06:51 »
Hi
Any chance that you can update the site so that it shows the correct earnings data for 123RF. Typically it always shows last month plus this current month. Even though its not a huge sum it its pretty annoying. The "earnings this month" data shown on the 123RF site always shows the correct amount for me but not in microstockplus.
Thank you.
Pages: [1]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
