|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - lobby
26
« on: November 09, 2008, 20:15 »
i agree with sjlocke ...
AVAVA...
1. if you have made money from this concept you where VERY LUCKY to make 50 special producers flow you... or..... they....
2. This is not creation just fabric production you could be better go to china it's cheaper....
27
« on: November 09, 2008, 19:59 »
80% down for me
28
« on: November 09, 2008, 19:58 »
"i don't like Yuri's"
BUT
the images are sold i i saw under the nane "Shoosh"
as RF
THE RULE IS
WE DON'T SELL SAME IMAGES RF AND RM
29
« on: November 09, 2008, 11:09 »
S.O.S.
S.O.S.
30
« on: November 07, 2008, 15:31 »
50-0
for me
31
« on: November 04, 2008, 08:16 »
Same here... my images are going down every day at best match only exlusives in front?  THEY CAN TELL US THAT THEY DON'T WANT ANY NEW IMAGES THENand we will see how is going to be their sales after a few months i guess we all want some answers here. and FAST EXCLUSIVES GET - More money = ok - More uploads = ok - Less rejections = ok -MORE VIEWS OVER THE REST OF US = NO WAY get serius
32
« on: November 01, 2008, 10:31 »
declining downloads and $ since july
i'm very disappointed
SS - 35 % UP
IS - 19 % down
DT - 13 % UP BME
FOT - 5% down WME
StockXpert - 5% down WME
123 - 3% down
BIG - 3% up
others 16% up
33
« on: October 30, 2008, 05:41 »
I got accepted, but i would like to know some more before start uploading.
They seems to have a sub model but i can't find any prices about phographers - what we get- and their return seems to be very low (20%)
Any one konws about fees and if there are any downloads.
34
« on: October 28, 2008, 10:17 »
i have a lot of views BUT no sales ?? My views are double then previus months and my sales are half ? Also a lot of sub downloads.
35
« on: October 27, 2008, 20:38 »
bull crap
36
« on: October 27, 2008, 20:37 »
hi : Einochi
sujest you read forum posts before upload (i didn't - but wasn't nessesary) bad attitude any way....
37
« on: October 27, 2008, 20:32 »
please close the door behind you....
it's a looser site that's all
:-)
craps out one by one
38
« on: October 26, 2008, 11:55 »
no sales
sales going down
waste of time....
39
« on: October 16, 2008, 15:52 »
40
« on: October 05, 2008, 19:01 »
i logged in few hours ago
but not now again
i've send them 3 mails no answer
i don't know if it's corbis site or not but they are by far the most
untrastable site
41
« on: October 05, 2008, 18:57 »
not me...
only 2000 images online
but i can't see them???
i guess is the will be the next shut down
42
« on: October 04, 2008, 10:29 »
same here...
the problem is not the money (zero any way)
the problem is paypal account and images...
43
« on: September 26, 2008, 13:45 »
slow sales for September 4 me 2
4 1st time,
Also slow in SS
44
« on: September 25, 2008, 18:13 »
for xmas i think
september - october
45
« on: September 25, 2008, 18:06 »
46
« on: September 25, 2008, 06:29 »
I have alot to say about my... ADVENTURE in Zymm... images disapear and appear and more and more... But I WANT TO CONTACT.... DOES ANYONE HANDLING THAT CONTACT TICKET stafff?? i've send 4 tickets and no answer? ?
47
« on: September 22, 2008, 10:33 »
In my opinion it's got to do with "On Demand" too
How do you think this is affecting overall sales and downloads?
My downloads also have decreased consistently since they implemented the OD feature, not much boost from new uploads either.
in my opinion by introdusing OD they destroy the inovativation of the site. Once the customers could download 25 images per day, they ( customers) try to do so downloading images that they don't even want them at the moment just to build a portfolio. As a conclusion of that (in my opinion) there were alot of downloads for photographers witch even with that tiny fee of some cents make us some money overall by the end of the month. The site get earnings by the non downloaded images then and every one was a bit happy i guess. By OD there is no hurry to download images more than they (customers) want to use. That's my opinion
48
« on: September 22, 2008, 08:41 »
WME
for me at SS
may be it's time to pull out??
In my opinion it's got to do with "On Demand" too
49
« on: September 06, 2008, 06:26 »
He is pointing to how badly they run microstock industry
1. instead of finding new clients they just compete with each other
2. prices are too low and that makes images look cheap and sales are declining
3. all of this is happening since amateurs are running the business of microstock sites.
am I close, lobby ?
exacly nice translation thanx vphoto - sharply_done, in your opinion everything is FINE??? !!!!!
50
« on: September 05, 2008, 19:59 »
I've been around for some over a year.
and my conclusion is that just amatuers run the business
it's a fast investment for them with way match proffits
THEY THINK...
They do sub reduce prices but nothing hapen...
In my opinion there must be about 500.000 maybe 1.000.000 clients in all microstock sites
which is very few word wide they are just running after each other instead of making business wider, they have wrong focus in business.
The candy is not that small as you have find -fom pioneers of the industry- in my opinion according to my involvement in this business (more than 20 yrs in creativing) the audience should far more.
And once more they should not mind about amatuers users - clients (that's why smaller sizes exist) they judge our work as "pros" -no way in my opinon to be a reviewer pro in this sites- and they sell our work for nothing
reducing "downloads-sales" in a brand new industry
i'm sure
they are
AMATEURS
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
