Don't be surprised if you see 0.29 or 0.32 on Adobe Stock,we have a large responsibility for this,it's your fault and mine too,because I still have other active ports,even if I no longer upload to any other agency except Adobe.

the race to the bottom is our responsibility.

every time you or I submit a photo for review on Istock,we agree to only get 15% of the sale,and we also agree that the content can be sold for 0,01

every time we send a video to SS for review we accept that it can be sold for 0.25

Adobe tries to do the best it can,find the right balance,and pay fair compensation to contributors,but there are limits,it must at the same time remain competitive with other large agencies.

think about this, the next time you submit content for review to SS or Istock,think that in that moment,when you press "submit" you are encouraging the race to the bottom!

In any case, you are not alone... My sales also dropped dramatically (currently minus 86%) and I also lost pictures.

123rf in the last few months:
I always got AI images through well before - a total of 5,500 accepted, 450 rejected.

Then in January, around 3,500 AI images were rejected in one go - I contacted support and only received a general reply.
I then tried again to find out why everything had suddenly been rejected.

Result: Support simply stopped answering me (no I wasn't rude) and since January there are 1476 AI images and 867 photos in the queue - no more reviews are taking place.
And since my first email to support, there has also been the slump in sales described above.

In summary, 123rf is no longer trustworthy for me at all since the beginning of 2024 and apparently no longer interested in material.

For me, they are now on a par with Canva (100% instant rejections) - WireStock (I'm supposed to pay for uploading?) - YayImages (no more invoices for 6 months) in the list of �most untrustworthy agencies�

Have a sunny day@all
Michael

Marjorie Taylor Greene says if she ran Jan. 6 Capitol attack, 'We would have won'

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-jan-6-capitol-attack-wouldve/story?id=95065444

 

"In briefings to Congress in recent weeks, administration officials have indicated that the US will likely send Ukraine long-range ATACMS, or Army Tactical Missile Systems, for the first time as part of the new aid package, three of the sources said.

Last fall the US first sent Ukraine the midrange variant of the ATACMS missile system, which can reach about 100 miles, while the longer-range version can reach as far as 190 miles."

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/23/politics/us-ukraine-military-aid-package/index.html
___

Let's see, let's look at these Democrats and the coward Biden.

ok Mat,so in fact something has changed in the meantime,from what I remember even the removal of a shadow,with the generative fill required labeling the content as AI.

so more freedom,well,adding a background generated with AI for example does not force you to label a content as AI,just like eliminate distracting elements with generative fill.

very interesting,I didn't know that,this shows how important it can be to be constantly updated on everything,things change quickly.

Is this also applicable to illustrative editorials?

thanks Mat!