MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
81
Shutterstock.com / Re: Anybody getting reviews?
« Last post by WD3 Photography on Yesterday at 12:47 »
Shutterstock is still slow on reviews.  :-\
 
For example, I have a commercial image that was not reviewed after 6 days.

They are currently slower to review than Dreamstime, Adobe Stock, Deposit Photos, and iStock.

Also, I don't like their new platform for loading photos and always switch to Legacy. It doesn't seem possible to copy out keywords before submitting the image.  >:(

82
Adobe Stock / Re: Does Adobe have any contact info for contributors?
« Last post by Big Toe on Yesterday at 12:44 »
Funny you ask... because there were many images and videos I've uploaded that I have no clue why would they be used and they have sold anyways.

It can happen, but I still think that a picture with a useful concept has a better chance of selling.

Concerning this picture: There are  alot of little things that dsiturb me a bit about it. Not a lot of the picture is sharp, the girls or women somehow seem to be hovering over these plates or tiles and the proportions seem a bit weird. They miss a clearly defined mouth or nose and the breasts are overemphasized. The hands are weird.

Character has been used multiple times as animation and a part of an image in the past and has sold multiple times... so I doubt any of this would now matter. Now when I made figures of them they found a "problem"?

The image in question is AI generated, isn't it?

My understanding is that when Adobe started accepting AI images, they accepted almost everything, even images with obvious flaws. Enough examples of that have been posted in this forum.

Now they are swamped with mass produced AI images and can afford to be more selective or I should perhaps say that they cannot afford not to be more selective and images that would have been accepted a few months ago are now rejected.

83
Off Topic / Re: This should settle some different opinions
« Last post by trucic on Yesterday at 12:22 »
then just sit and wait prey for Trumps victory, peace and justice in your modern world
84
Funny you ask... because there were many images and videos I've uploaded that I have no clue why would they be used and they have sold anyways.

It can happen, but I still think that a picture with a useful concept has a better chance of selling.

Concerning this picture: There are  alot of little things that dsiturb me a bit about it. Not a lot of the picture is sharp, the girls or women somehow seem to be hovering over these plates or tiles and the proportions seem a bit weird. They miss a clearly defined mouth or nose and the breasts are overemphasized. The hands are weird.

Character has been used multiple times as animation and a part of an image in the past and has sold multiple times... so I doubt any of this would now matter. Now when I made figures of them they found a "problem"?
85
SS subscription is not correct. The subscription should cost $16-25 per month and the buyer should receive unlimited video downloads. In this case, the author's income increases.

Are you serious or joking?  If you are serious, how will that increase contributors' income?

Did you read his previous responses ( about unlimited subscription plans/sites) to other posts? If you did, I don't know why you wasting your time to responding him ;D
+100
Accordingly, I will not waste time on answers and explanations.
 ;D ;D ;D
86
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock 4K video now available in subscriptions
« Last post by blvdone on Yesterday at 11:10 »
SS subscription is not correct. The subscription should cost $16-25 per month and the buyer should receive unlimited video downloads. In this case, the author's income increases.

Are you serious or joking?  If you are serious, how will that increase contributors' income?

Did you read his previous responses to other posts? If you did, I don't know why you wasting your time to responding him ;D

 ;D ;D  Ah, OK. 
87
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock 4K video now available in subscriptions
« Last post by Ambu on Yesterday at 11:04 »
SS subscription is not correct. The subscription should cost $16-25 per month and the buyer should receive unlimited video downloads. In this case, the author's income increases.

Are you serious or joking?  If you are serious, how will that increase contributors' income?

Did you read his previous responses ( about unlimited subscription plans/sites) to other posts? If you did, I don't know why you wasting your time to responding him ;D
88
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock 4K video now available in subscriptions
« Last post by blvdone on Yesterday at 10:52 »
SS subscription is not correct. The subscription should cost $16-25 per month and the buyer should receive unlimited video downloads. In this case, the author's income increases.

Are you serious or joking?  If you are serious, how will that increase contributors' income?
89
Off Topic / Re: This should settle some different opinions
« Last post by stoker2014 on Yesterday at 10:44 »
modern colonisation thats why I am talking nothing is free..: they are protecting their investements and you are doing them a favor by using and paying for weapons if Trump wins, by loans
Here you are wrong and your reasoning is very primitive. I wrote a lot about this to everyone.

1. You cannot compare people in the EU countries and North America with Russian orcs. These are completely different people. More precisely, Russians are not people.
2. In the EU countries there is democracy, in russia there is fas.cism and Naz.ism.
3. There are a lot of Europarasites in EU countries, its true.
4. There is corruption and crime in NATO countries, this is also true.
5. NATO does not colonize Ukraine, these countries help Ukraine kill Russian orcs so that the Russians do not approach the borders of the EU and begin further occupation of EU countries.
6. Trump offers not only interest-free loans, but also loans that, under certain conditions, do not even need to be repaid. Everything depends on the level of well-being of Ukraine. Of course, Ukraine is ready to return any loan if it has such an opportunity. Also, under the Republicans, Lend-Lease is possible, and this is not a loan at all, but a direct supply of weapons to Ukraine.
90
Off Topic / Re: This should settle some different opinions
« Last post by trucic on Yesterday at 10:17 »
modern colonisation thats why I am talking nothing is free..: they are protecting their investements and you are doing them a favor by using and paying for weapons if Trump wins, by loans
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors