Microstock Photography Forum - General > Selling Stock Direct
Contributor's Collective
madelaide:
Hi Dan,
Just an idea that we should observe in the uploads, a kind of self-regulation, is trying to upload images that have been approved in 3 big agencies at least. In my case, I will consider IS, DT and FT, except for the illustrations, which I will consider DT and FT only, as I don't have them at IS (I do rasters).
Thanks for the initiative!
djpadavona:
Thanks VB! Would love to have you with us if that crown ever breaks. :D
@Madelaide - I've been thinking about that issue too. In general I agree we should stick to uploading images which have a track record of success, or have at least gotten multiple approvals. However I think we may have an opportunity to offer some image types which generally don't get a lot of interest with the micros. So if you have a really good image that didn't fit in with IS, FT, etc., then it is probably worth giving it a chance with a different audience.
bad to the bone:
what "defines your track record of success"?
btw. you will get a tsunami of mailwork, but i enjoy your commitment.
brm1949:
Not sure if I qualify but if I do count me in. If in you opinion I don't, I will not take offence and really hope it takes off. We need to do something.
cthoman:
--- Quote from: djpadavona on March 14, 2011, 16:24 ---Thank you.
Cory, I should have the site set up for vectors soon. If you are interested, the door will be wide open for you.
--- End quote ---
Thanks. I'll definitely have to check it out.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version