Author Topic: $.36 SOD on Shutterstock (Read 15398 times)

calcaneus10 · « **on:** November 30, 2013, 16:50 »

Anyone else get this?

Lowest SOD I've seen is $.80 Two days in a row now...

Ron · « **Reply #1 on:** November 30, 2013, 16:52 »

Could be Facebook. Ask [email protected]

calcaneus10 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 30, 2013, 17:11 »

Hmm, interesting. I will email them...

mike ledray · « **Reply #3 on:** November 30, 2013, 18:00 »

Hey its a Sale!
You MADE MONEY!
Congratulations!

Your image was purchased out of MILLIONS, your doing Great!

fritz · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2013, 18:26 »

Yes, same here SOD for 0.95.
Cheers,

MarcvsTvllivs · « **Reply #5 on:** December 01, 2013, 09:34 »

Thanksgiving weekend promotion?

calcaneus10 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 01, 2013, 10:34 »

gbalex · « **Reply #7 on:** December 01, 2013, 11:36 »

Quote from: Ron on November 30, 2013, 16:52

Could be Facebook. Ask [email protected]

That would be my guess also.

stockastic · « **Reply #8 on:** December 01, 2013, 11:47 »

Can't wait to hear the details of this Exciting New Opportunity.

Ron · « **Reply #9 on:** December 01, 2013, 11:53 »

Quote from: stockastic on December 01, 2013, 11:47

Can't wait to hear the details of this Exciting New Opportunity.

Its old news IF it is from the FB deal

https://www.facebook.com/facebookforbusiness/news/shutterstock-multiple-image-upload-page-manager

http://www.shutterstock.com/blog/2013/08/facebook/

I think the general consensus is that it is a good deal for all parties.

calcaneus10 · « **Reply #10 on:** December 02, 2013, 10:33 »

Well, I never heard back from shutterstock, but I'm pretty sure it's what Ron said.....Facebook. The SOD is equivalent to your subscription level.

stockastic · « **Reply #11 on:** December 02, 2013, 11:22 »

So "high quality imagery for businesses" turns out to mean 36 cents. And no opting out. Sweet indeed.

Ron · « **Reply #12 on:** December 02, 2013, 11:25 »

Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:22

So "high quality imagery for businesses" turns out to mean 36 cents. And no opting out. Sweet indeed.

They only get thumbnail size.

stockastic · « **Reply #13 on:** December 02, 2013, 11:39 »

Quote from: Ron on December 02, 2013, 11:25

Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:22
So "high quality imagery for businesses" turns out to mean 36 cents. And no opting out. Sweet indeed.
They only get thumbnail size.

How do they define "thumbnail"? I'll bet these are actually around 400px. Have they stated the size?

Ron · « **Reply #14 on:** December 02, 2013, 11:49 »

Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:39

Quote from: Ron on December 02, 2013, 11:25
Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:22
So "high quality imagery for businesses" turns out to mean 36 cents. And no opting out. Sweet indeed.
They only get thumbnail size.

How do they define "thumbnail"? I'll bet these are actually around 400px. Have they stated the size?

You can ask the question here,
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133451 or try it out on Facebook yourself. I dont have the exact answer. There was a thread from SS as well on this. See if I can find it.

Ron · « **Reply #15 on:** December 02, 2013, 12:03 »

http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/shutterstock-facebook#more-7865?customer_ID=395407&campaign_ID=shutters.54592&launch_ID=24062

http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/22/facebook-shutterstock/

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=131857

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=131872

ShadySue · « **Reply #16 on:** December 02, 2013, 12:16 »

Quote from: Ron on December 02, 2013, 11:49

Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:39
Quote from: Ron on December 02, 2013, 11:25
Quote from: stockastic on December 02, 2013, 11:22
So "high quality imagery for businesses" turns out to mean 36 cents. And no opting out. Sweet indeed.
They only get thumbnail size.

How do they define "thumbnail"? I'll bet these are actually around 400px. Have they stated the size?
You can ask the question here,
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133451 or try it out on Facebook yourself. I dont have the exact answer. There was a thread from SS as well on this. See if I can find it.

This certainly isn't an 'exact answer'.
"Images used in ads will be limited to digital sizes — often appearing as thumbnails."

Is there a 'standard' on the definition of 'digital sizes'? All files are 'digital size'.
But then SS doesn't price by size anyway.

Ron · « **Reply #17 on:** December 02, 2013, 12:19 »

If you want an exact answer, [email protected]. I dug up 7 links, I dont have the answer. If someone feels they are being sold out, contact Shutterstock directly.

Red Dove · « **Reply #18 on:** December 02, 2013, 15:22 »

Good business move as far as I'm concerned. Creating another revenue stream is better than flogging off stuff wholesale for a one-off compensation or giving non-sellers away for free. And if it picks up I can stop uploading to some of the walking dead in the middle tier

Ron · « **Reply #20 on:** December 03, 2013, 17:54 »

Thanks Anthony, just to take away all concerns, what is the max res offered to Facebook users?

luissantos84 · « **Reply #21 on:** December 03, 2013, 20:11 »

Quote from: Ron on December 03, 2013, 17:54

Thanks Anthony, just to take away all concerns, what is the max res offered to Facebook users?

had one today and just checked it at FB ads, 1000 x 727, looks like Med size

stockastic · « **Reply #22 on:** December 03, 2013, 20:47 »

So basically it's non-subscription sales at subscription prices.

We enter a whole new market, already at the bottom.

leaf · « **Reply #23 on:** December 04, 2013, 01:33 »

Quote from: stockastic on December 03, 2013, 20:47

So basically it's non-subscription sales at subscription prices.

We enter a whole new market, already at the bottom.

The license is very limited, the buyer can only use the image on Facebook.. it is a bit different. It seems like a good/fair deal to me. Here is more info from Shutterstock http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/shutterstock-facebook

Ron · « **Reply #24 on:** December 04, 2013, 02:15 »

Quote from: luissantos84 on December 03, 2013, 20:11

Quote from: Ron on December 03, 2013, 17:54
Thanks Anthony, just to take away all concerns, what is the max res offered to Facebook users?

had one today and just checked it at FB ads, 1000 x 727, looks like Med size

Ok, thats quite big, and not a thumbnail as the blog says

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: $.36 SOD on Shutterstock (Read 15398 times)

calcaneus10

Ron

calcaneus10

mike ledray

fritz

MarcvsTvllivs

calcaneus10

gbalex

stockastic

Ron

calcaneus10

stockastic

Ron

stockastic

Ron

Ron

ShadySue

Ron

Red Dove

anthonycorreia

Ron

luissantos84

stockastic

leaf

Ron

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors