Author Topic: $75 sensitive use? (Read 8212 times)

Phil · « **on:** December 24, 2012, 09:11 »

anyone know of anything else apart from sensitive use that gives a $75 commission on SS?

Not complaining one bit but I have what appears to be a sensitive use licence on an illustration of chocolate

JPSDK · « **Reply #1 on:** December 24, 2012, 10:08 »

There must be other licences than sensitive, because I had one of these fat ones of a golden retriever.

steheap · « **Reply #2 on:** December 24, 2012, 10:27 »

And I had a $90 download for an image of my cat!

Steve

RacePhoto · « **Reply #3 on:** December 24, 2012, 10:29 »

Quote from: JPSDK on December 24, 2012, 10:08

There must be other licences than sensitive, because I had one of these fat ones of a golden retriever.

Maybe the retriever is a feeling loving kind sensitive dog and cares about how it's image is used? How would you like your photo on a heart worms medication advertisement?

Cats are confused, but "feeling"?

Yeah, I'd love one of those $75 sales. But instead I'll take my steady trickle of subs and be happy.

Newsfocus1 · « **Reply #4 on:** December 24, 2012, 10:48 »

The Individual Image Licenses can include an option for Sensitive Use but that doesn't automatically mean they are being used in that way. Here's a link to a Shutterbuzz post about the subject http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/individual-image-licenses-update
Kind regards, David.

Edit to fix wonky link (I hope!)

steheap · « **Reply #5 on:** December 24, 2012, 11:29 »

Quote

Cats are confused, but "feeling"?

It looks kinda sad:

Could be some new anti depressant drug for pets?

Steve

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #6 on:** December 24, 2012, 16:17 »

Clearly, they bought the cat to make a composite with the dress-up sunglasses I sold a sensitive or "other" license for:

With apologies to Steve Heap's lovely cat

Phil · « **Reply #7 on:** December 24, 2012, 19:52 »

steheap · « **Reply #8 on:** December 24, 2012, 22:01 »

Very nice! I'll have to try some shots with a pair of glasses!

Steve

tab62 · « **Reply #9 on:** December 25, 2012, 00:04 »

haven't you learn what happen to Yuri with those sunglasses

Eco · « **Reply #10 on:** December 25, 2012, 01:50 »

I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75.

tab62 · « **Reply #11 on:** December 25, 2012, 02:12 »

someday I will get one- someday

w7lwi · « **Reply #12 on:** December 25, 2012, 12:44 »

Quote from: Eco on December 25, 2012, 01:50

I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75.

An SOD sale does not mean a sensitive use application. SOD stands for Single On Demand. That is, it's a single image sale that Shutterstock has negotiated a special price with the buyer, usually large, high volume agencies and the like. Sensitive use images fall under this type of sale, but so do any other type of images that the buyer has a particular need for that fall outside of the other pricing venues that SS offers. I've had several sales of this sort, the highest being $112, but several in the $75-$90 range. None of them could even remotely be considered for sensitive use.

THP Creative · « **Reply #13 on:** December 26, 2012, 20:48 »

Quote from: Eco on December 25, 2012, 01:50

I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75.

Really nice port Eco, love the wildlife shots.

Eco · « **Reply #14 on:** December 27, 2012, 05:13 »

Thank you for the kind words Microstock Man

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: $75 sensitive use? (Read 8212 times)

Phil

JPSDK

steheap

RacePhoto

Newsfocus1

steheap

Jo Ann Snover

Phil

steheap

tab62

Eco

tab62

w7lwi

THP Creative

Eco

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors