MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: "It's not stock, it's Shutterstock"  (Read 11357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #75 on: January 18, 2019, 10:02 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

why you talk about india population ....we are talking about shutter stock contributor...nobody  ever talked about india as country....if there are 1000 contributor from india and 100 are theft or summer...there is a problem....you are mounting an anti racist campaign, but i already showed you that i travel to poor country and live in ukraine and russia...that's why i have the experience to see that in most of those country there are simply zero rules about business...zero. only counts money and profits the rest, those law that are a normal thing in many country simply doesn't exist. we are talking about country like india where still some people are considered inferior and not worth a job or vote right.



« Reply #76 on: January 18, 2019, 11:24 »
+1
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2019, 11:41 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #77 on: January 18, 2019, 11:42 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of a certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem"

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for poor people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody is insulting people...or nations...you are presenting others problems...because you have a distorted view of reality made uo of your conditions and hate towards trump mostly, so you see   everybody as racist....other people told you the same....

probably you never go out from your sofa, just to shoot some nightcap of new york...or go back to your country,  take a flight and live in other country instead of talk about something you clearly don't have any clue.
if there are 10000 indian country and 100 steal is not a little problem is great problem...considering that probably there are not even 1000 and mostly steal is a big problem. is not abut 10...ten are those discovered by a simple research.

telling the problem is not caused by theft but by those who don't control...is like saying that raping  a woman is not a fault of who assault her but the faulty was of her dressing in a sex manner.

« Reply #78 on: January 18, 2019, 11:44 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody want ban hal f of the world...you are telling words nobody has told...and this make you a little piece of crap.

« Reply #79 on: January 18, 2019, 11:49 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of a certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem"

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for poor people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody is insulting people...or nations...you are presenting others problems...because you have a distorted view of reality made uo of your conditions and hate towards trump mostly, so you see   everybody as racist....other people told you the same....

probably you never go out from your sofa, just to shoot some nightcap of new york...or go back to your country,  take a flight and live in other country instead of talk about something you clearly don't have any clue.
if there are 10000 indian country and 100 steal is not a little problem is great problem...considering that probably there are not even 1000 and mostly steal is a big problem. is not abut 10...ten are those discovered by a simple research.

telling the problem is not caused by theft but by those who don't control...is like saying that raping  a woman is not a fault of who assault her but the faulty was of her dressing in a sex manner.

"Ad Hominem" at its best.

About the "rape" nonsense: it's the very opposite of what I'm saying.

What you are saying is that ALL men are guilty because one of them (or 10) is a rapist.
Or the classical: Mexicans are rapists, because we caught one.

That's what YOU are saying when you see everything through your xenophobic glasses.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2019, 11:52 by Zero Talent »

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #80 on: January 18, 2019, 11:54 »
+2
Wow this is a good place for a lock...  ::)

« Reply #81 on: January 18, 2019, 11:57 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of a certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem"

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for poor people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody is insulting people...or nations...you are presenting others problems...because you have a distorted view of reality made uo of your conditions and hate towards trump mostly, so you see   everybody as racist....other people told you the same....

probably you never go out from your sofa, just to shoot some nightcap of new york...or go back to your country,  take a flight and live in other country instead of talk about something you clearly don't have any clue.
if there are 10000 indian country and 100 steal is not a little problem is great problem...considering that probably there are not even 1000 and mostly steal is a big problem. is not abut 10...ten are those discovered by a simple research.

telling the problem is not caused by theft but by those who don't control...is like saying that raping  a woman is not a fault of who assault her but the faulty was of her dressing in a sex manner.

"Ad Hominem" at its best.

About the "rape" nonsense: it's the very opposite of what I'm saying.

What you are saying is that ALL men are guilty because one of them (or 10) is a rapist.
Or the classical: Mexicans are rapists, because we caught one.

That's what YOU are saying when you see everything through your xenophobic glasses.

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm.


this is the same as giving the fault to the victim of a rape cause he has high heels and mini skirt....the fact that even in the last message you tried , with mediocre results, to present your words in another form show exactly you nature...the example of median show exactly your anti trumps taken everywhere even in a photo   forum..most of theft in microstcok come form india russia and other third world country..is a fas proven. the rest are the crap you are telling...mandriotu..go back to ss forum..who probably you even work for ss.

« Reply #82 on: January 18, 2019, 12:23 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of a certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem"

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for poor people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody is insulting people...or nations...you are presenting others problems...because you have a distorted view of reality made uo of your conditions and hate towards trump mostly, so you see   everybody as racist....other people told you the same....

probably you never go out from your sofa, just to shoot some nightcap of new york...or go back to your country,  take a flight and live in other country instead of talk about something you clearly don't have any clue.
if there are 10000 indian country and 100 steal is not a little problem is great problem...considering that probably there are not even 1000 and mostly steal is a big problem. is not abut 10...ten are those discovered by a simple research.

telling the problem is not caused by theft but by those who don't control...is like saying that raping  a woman is not a fault of who assault her but the faulty was of her dressing in a sex manner.

"Ad Hominem" at its best.

About the "rape" nonsense: it's the very opposite of what I'm saying.

What you are saying is that ALL men are guilty because one of them (or 10) is a rapist.
Or the classical: Mexicans are rapists, because we caught one.

That's what YOU are saying when you see everything through your xenophobic glasses.

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm.


this is the same as giving the fault to the victim of a rape cause he has high heels and mini skirt....the fact that even in the last message you tried , with mediocre results, to present your words in another form show exactly you nature...the example of median show exactly your anti trumps taken everywhere even in a photo   forum..most of theft in microstcok come form india russia and other third world country..is a fas proven. the rest are the crap you are telling...mandriotu..go back to ss forum..who probably you even work for ss.

I "probably work for SS"! Lol! You got me!
Another example of how accurate your conclusions are! That's really impressive!

It's my mistake to try to reason with you when it's obvious that You can't root with the hogs and have a clean nose

« Reply #83 on: January 18, 2019, 12:25 »
+1
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of a certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem"

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for poor people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody is insulting people...or nations...you are presenting others problems...because you have a distorted view of reality made uo of your conditions and hate towards trump mostly, so you see   everybody as racist....other people told you the same....

probably you never go out from your sofa, just to shoot some nightcap of new york...or go back to your country,  take a flight and live in other country instead of talk about something you clearly don't have any clue.
if there are 10000 indian country and 100 steal is not a little problem is great problem...considering that probably there are not even 1000 and mostly steal is a big problem. is not abut 10...ten are those discovered by a simple research.

telling the problem is not caused by theft but by those who don't control...is like saying that raping  a woman is not a fault of who assault her but the faulty was of her dressing in a sex manner.

"Ad Hominem" at its best.

About the "rape" nonsense: it's the very opposite of what I'm saying.

What you are saying is that ALL men are guilty because one of them (or 10) is a rapist.
Or the classical: Mexicans are rapists, because we caught one.

That's what YOU are saying when you see everything through your xenophobic glasses.

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm.


this is the same as giving the fault to the victim of a rape cause he has high heels and mini skirt....the fact that even in the last message you tried , with mediocre results, to present your words in another form show exactly you nature...the example of median show exactly your anti trumps taken everywhere even in a photo   forum..most of theft in microstcok come form india russia and other third world country..is a fas proven. the rest are the crap you are telling...mandriotu..go back to ss forum..who probably you even work for ss.

I "probably work for SS"! Lol! You got me!
Another example of how accurate your conclusions are! That's really impressive!

It's my mistake to try to reason with you when it's obvious that You can't root with the hogs and have a clean nose

what you said everybody can read...no point in discussing with you...you justify stealing giving the fault to lack of control of ss...this is mentality from russai    RUMENIA and india...that'si

« Reply #84 on: January 18, 2019, 12:31 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody want ban hal f of the world...you are telling words nobody has told...and this make you a little piece of crap.

India + China + Pakistan + Bangladesh + Russia + Thailand +... = ~3.4 billion people
That's 45% of the world population. Not half.

My mistake! You got me!  ;D

« Reply #85 on: January 18, 2019, 12:51 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody want ban hal f of the world...you are telling words nobody has told...and this make you a little piece of crap.

India + China + Pakistan + Bangladesh + Russia + Thailand +... = ~3.4 billion people
That's 45% of the world population. Not half.

My mistake! You got me!  ;D

idiot you understand that we are talking about contributor of ss?

« Reply #86 on: January 18, 2019, 13:14 »
+3
Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm.

Setting aside all the personal attacks I think this is the crux of the problem.  No nationality, ethnicity, gender, etc. has a monopoly on fraudsters - they can be anyone, anywhere.  I don't care where they come from or what their motivations are, if they are stealing other people's work, they should be caught and shut down.

Of course it is easier said than done, but you'd think a major IT company like SS could do a much better job of identifying people who submit stolen images, at least on their own site.  Certainly it should be possible to check every submitted image for exact duplicates in the portfolios of other contributors - just like you can do a plagiarism check on text.  It becomes more difficult if they have modified it by changing the color, switching out the sky or making other kinds of composites.  However, you'd think a company with the resources of SS could find a way to do it if they wanted.  The problem is that they make the same amount of money if someone buys a stolen image as from the original contributor, so probably don't have much incentive to police portfolios carefully.  It is only if someone steals an image and sells it elsewhere that they lose, at least in the short term.  If they want to keep their top contributors in the long term though this is something they should get sorted out.

Scientific journals usually have an automatic plagiarism check of every submitted manuscript because of exactly this problem.  I have seen manuscripts that literally had cobbled together whole paragraphs stolen from other authors with no attribution.  Once caught, those people were banned from publishing in the journal and notices also were sent out to the editors of other journals in similar fields.  Maybe microstock companies need to start doing the same thing - with the caveat that they would need some sort of appeal process in case somebody is wrongly accused.

« Reply #87 on: January 18, 2019, 15:23 »
0
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody want ban hal f of the world...you are telling words nobody has told...and this make you a little piece of crap.

India + China + Pakistan + Bangladesh + Russia + Thailand +... = ~3.4 billion people
That's 45% of the world population. Not half.

My mistake! You got me!  ;D

idiot you understand that we are talking about contributor of ss?

You are not talking about SS. You are talking about how morally decayed people from certain parts of the world are. You even have "explanations": it's because of "poverty", "communism", "lack of social fiber", "corruption", etc, etc, etc...

You are the perfect example. I'm not blaming your co-nationals for the way you behave on this forum. You are very rude and you use insults in almost every sentence. It's not the fault of your co-nationals for sharing the same country with such a rude individual.

Are you still with me? If yes, read further:

SS should take action against their bad behaved contributors, no matter what country they come from, without penalizing other honest and hard working co-nationals.
Similarly, MSG forum admins should take action against their bad behaved members, like you, without penalizing all your co-nationals.
When others are forced to witness your insults, it's because there is little or no moderation on this forum, not because your co-nationals are morally decayed.

Do you see what I mean?
« Last Edit: January 18, 2019, 15:36 by Zero Talent »

ShadySue

« Reply #88 on: January 18, 2019, 15:39 »
+1
what a bunch of stupidity.. being an immigrant from rumen in usa make you so nervous about that theme? i travel all the world love ukraine and russsia, indian african but this don't deny th fact that most of spammers and thieves in shtterstock come from these country. and has nothing to do with politics or xenophobia...i already said find 10 20 thieves from france, or usa...i expect.
Well, to be frank, most of the image/article thieves I've found have been in China.
That and an Irish lawyer who is refusing to answer emails or speak to me on the phone, or reply to letters. After similarly dissing Alamy.

« Reply #89 on: January 18, 2019, 16:26 »
+1
Look at it from a statistical risk management point of view.
If a disproportionate amount of fraud come from a small minority of areas, that's not racist in any way.
A lot of these countries have next to no IP or copyright laws and/or next to no enforcement.

Piracy, counterfeiting and everything else are big business there and are allowed to continue unabated.  Either there are no useful laws to enforce or the authorities have no interest in enforcing them (or are even involved).

That's saying nothing about individuals or anything about race, its just cold, statistical fact.  From a business point of view it quite simply might not be worth the risk to do business with or accept submissions from those areas for those reasons.

Disproportionate? India has 1.35 billion people. 10 thieves is 0.0000007% of Indians.
USA has 325 million pops. 1 thief from USA is proportional to 4 thieves from India.
So comparing 4 thieves against 10 thieves is more or less in the same ballpark and I would not call that disproportionate.

Our dear xenophobe, should also add, as per some recent reports, Serbia, Brunei and Turkey to his list of cheating nations which already includes, Russia, Ukraine, India, Thailand, Pakistan, China, Algeria and of course, even if not on his list, USA.

If I compare 10 thieves from India with 1 thief from Serbia (out of 7 million pops), then proportionally Serbs are bigger thieves than Indians. But nobody steal as much as people from Brunei. Yes, Brunei people, with 1 thief out of 480,000 pops are the biggest thieves on the planet.

Again, it is a Shutterstock problem, thieves are everywhere.

you are sick man...go and detoxicate from trumps....really...10 are this found by a guy in a bunch of hour understand? there are hundred are, and more coming. i suggest you..live your * sofa in usa , country who welcome you as immigrant...and go live in india and open a * business..then come back year and talk again, and this has nothing to do with racism.....has to do   with the lack of any * rules who me and you consider  normal business law...go in china and open a * business ...o and visit some place where workers live and work 24 hours without any rules.

You think of yourself as sociologist able to understand and explain the root cause of certain behavioral patterns (because of poverty, communism, corruption, bad social fabric, etc, etc, etc...)
Let me break some news for you: you are NOT a sociologist, you are a xenophobe. Sociologists are always attempting to explain why people behave in certain ways, by using advanced statistics to prove their hypothesis.
It's not as simple as you think. Analyzing 10 cases means nothing statistically. 0.0000007% means nothing. These people may well be part of a forum or some group, where a dishonest idea has been shared. In other words, that group is very different than the rest population or contributors from that country you wrongfully accused. It's always a possibility.
But it's much easier to jump to conclusions and explain everything with your xenophobic bias.

It's very telling that when I try to bring you simple numbers to present a different view on the same topic, you reply with insults. You swiftly move between insulting nations and insulting persons. As I said above, your only arguments are childish "name calling" and "ad hominem".

So I'll repeat: it's a Shutterstock problem, not a people problem. Shutterstock rules are not strong enough. They need a better fraud detection algorithm. Whatever happens with governments in those countries is secondary and clearly not part of the solution.

Those xenophobic proposals to ban half of the world from contributing or to make things harder for ALL people coming from all those countries, will only make honest and hard working poor people's lives even more difficult.

nobody want ban hal f of the world...you are telling words nobody has told...and this make you a little piece of crap.

India + China + Pakistan + Bangladesh + Russia + Thailand +... = ~3.4 billion people
That's 45% of the world population. Not half.

My mistake! You got me!  ;D

idiot you understand that we are talking about contributor of ss?

You are not talking about SS. You are talking about how morally decayed people from certain parts of the world are. You even have "explanations": it's because of "poverty", "communism", "lack of social fiber", "corruption", etc, etc, etc...

You are the perfect example. I'm not blaming your co-nationals for the way you behave on this forum. You are very rude and you use insults in almost every sentence. It's not the fault of your co-nationals for sharing the same country with such a rude individual.

Are you still with me? If yes, read further:

SS should take action against their bad behaved contributors, no matter what country they come from, without penalizing other honest and hard working co-nationals.
Similarly, MSG forum admins should take action against their bad behaved members, like you, without penalizing all your co-nationals.
When others are forced to witness your insults, it's because there is little or no moderation on this forum, not because your co-nationals are morally decayed.

Do you see what I mean?
. Maybe in romania you drink too much, is the only clear explanation for this conplete nonsense.

« Reply #90 on: January 18, 2019, 16:27 »
+1
what a bunch of stupidity.. being an immigrant from rumen in usa make you so nervous about that theme? i travel all the world love ukraine and russsia, indian african but this don't deny th fact that most of spammers and thieves in shtterstock come from these country. and has nothing to do with politics or xenophobia...i already said find 10 20 thieves from france, or usa...i expect.
Well, to be frank, most of the image/article thieves I've found have been in China.
That and an Irish lawyer who is refusing to answer emails or speak to me on the phone, or reply to letters. After similarly dissing Alamy.
. China is an ethic national... nking if respect of copyright of others))  wit for zero brain to attack you as racist and haters of chinese people

Brasilnut

  • Author Brutally Honest Guide to Microstock & Blog

« Reply #91 on: January 19, 2019, 23:11 »
+2


« Reply #92 on: January 20, 2019, 11:50 »
0
55...ahhahaha...and the idiot still think this is a 10 people phenomenon.....ahahah...and expect thousand more since shutter stock offer contributor 20 different languages...100 dollar for poor people in third world county like india make a difference...and is not racism is the true unfortunately for them and us.

« Reply #93 on: January 20, 2019, 12:01 »
+1
i don't know if i am wrong or not, but  ss in my opinion could face a jury trial for misconduct...if i find my images sold by some other contributor be sure i will see if i can   move against ss...they are selling something against the rule and contracts i signed...for sure theft are going much further


https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/elephant-forest-1211469475?src=BGwqzCGGTdSjRtcncjs-1g-6-39

using such a famous and bestseller image is not like using a * snapshots of some unnow people in sss...i email david of this...who know if he react legally against ss...

Brasilnut

  • Author Brutally Honest Guide to Microstock & Blog

« Reply #94 on: January 20, 2019, 12:26 »
0
55...ahhahaha...

There's probably 5,500 active accounts or 1% of all AT LEAST!

« Reply #95 on: January 20, 2019, 12:53 »
0
55...ahhahaha...

There's probably 5,500 active accounts or 1% of all AT LEAST!

as i said don'tknow if it's a crime in usa but they are selling something illecit...they will face for sure big problems soon...imagine some idiot from india uploading some mario testino or salgado images? :)......ss is so idiot not even consider this...and we idiots who spend money travel and produce photos...just to see our revenue killed by spammer thief...

« Reply #96 on: January 20, 2019, 12:54 »
+1
55...ahhahaha...and the idiot still think this is a 10 people phenomenon.....ahahah...and expect thousand more since shutter stock offer contributor 20 different languages...100 dollar for poor people in third world county like india make a difference...and is not racism is the true unfortunately for them and us.

https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/in/Salem-India

net salary in a 700000 people city of india is according to number near 290 dollar. is clear they do this.   

« Reply #97 on: January 20, 2019, 13:20 »
0
55...ahhahaha...

There's probably 5,500 active accounts or 1% of all AT LEAST!

as i said don'tknow if it's a crime in usa but they are selling something illecit...they will face for sure big problems soon...imagine some idiot from india uploading some mario testino or salgado images? :)......ss is so idiot not even consider this...and we idiots who spend money travel and produce photos...just to see our revenue killed by spammer thief...

Leaving your personal attacks and insults aside, your sheer ignorance and blatant xenophobic "justifications" never cease to amaze me.

FYI, even if in an absurd case, you'll manage to find-out that 99% of Indians are thieves (because of poverty or whatever other pseudo-arguments you like to come up with), you still can't say that "(All) Indians are thieves". What you can do is only saying that a large majority of Indians have been caught steeling. In this hypothetical extreme example, what you do is to accuse 1% of honest, innocent Indians of theft. That's about 13 million people or more than the population of many European countries.

Besides the fact that India has 1.35 billion pops, there are many other possible explanations for those findings. But when you are filled with so much hate, your brain stops functioning.
Like a raging bull, you only see red in front of you.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2019, 14:20 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #98 on: January 20, 2019, 17:55 »
+2
what is this train wreck of a thread

moderator anyone?

RAW

« Reply #99 on: January 20, 2019, 19:35 »
+3
India population 1.339 billion and has free healthcare for all.
USA population 325 million and just can't afford universal healthcare.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
4895 Views
Last post December 01, 2010, 18:38
by ShadySue
5 Replies
4918 Views
Last post September 17, 2011, 22:33
by PeterChigmaroff
25 Replies
12914 Views
Last post May 26, 2015, 05:40
by cathyslife
4 Replies
2310 Views
Last post March 08, 2014, 20:34
by w7lwi
9 Replies
2626 Views
Last post March 23, 2015, 16:51
by heywoody

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results