pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Inconsistent reviewing  (Read 26592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Phadrea

    This user is banned.
« Reply #200 on: February 01, 2014, 06:03 »
0
Unbelievable. It's pretty much a whole batch rejected or accepted. The latest batcjh being rejected. One image i just cant get accepted and yet another image of the same shoot which sells very well on SS keeps gettting turned down and it is a better image than the one accepted. They don' t have a clue really. I have re-submitted better versions of files already in my port as there is no way of updating the image once accepted. They were of course rejected. I also had a note with all images rejected in this last batch saying "Not Approved
Please delete approved image. Include a detailed note describing the resubmission reason" how can i delete images there were not accepted ? Talk about not making sense.


« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 06:06 by Herg »


« Reply #201 on: February 01, 2014, 07:14 »
0
It sounds to me as if they have recognised that you already have the image in your portfolio and they want you to delete the original before uploading the replacement.  Which risks ending up with neither of them there.

Phadrea

    This user is banned.
« Reply #202 on: February 01, 2014, 08:06 »
0
Exactly but many times before they have accepted images I already have in my port. I did put a note with the re-submitted images when I sent them explaining they are better edits than the ones in my catalog. This seems to prove too much for them to accommodate. next time I will just re-submit and say nowt. Then, if accepted I will delete the image already there. Just shows how inconsistent they are if they might refuse an already accepted image.

« Reply #203 on: February 01, 2014, 09:46 »
0
I wonder if it is more profitable to employ such insufficient inspectors than loosing money maker images that will sell for years. I wonder what the shareholders think about this insufficient management policy.

The site would only lose money if the work is so unique that there isn't an alternative for the buyer - I'd reckon SS shareholders are just fine with SS's management policy.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
6 Replies
3481 Views
Last post May 07, 2008, 14:23
by melastmohican
9 Replies
3038 Views
Last post August 13, 2008, 07:32
by ichiro17
5 Replies
1695 Views
Last post September 18, 2013, 10:02
by ruxpriencdiam
12 Replies
4194 Views
Last post November 23, 2013, 04:56
by BaldricksTrousers
3 Replies
3861 Views
Last post November 20, 2018, 05:26
by Not Today

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle