pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Catalog Manager - New toys for the contributer  (Read 8216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: October 07, 2011, 10:43 »
0
Yes, SS contributors get the world map, the catalog manager - I wish istock offered us tools like that.

I also wish istock came up with them first... :-[

That's because Istock spend all their time and (our) money giving holidays to inspectors and the 'in-crowd' in Milan, London, Tokyo, etc.


fujiko

« Reply #26 on: October 07, 2011, 10:47 »
0
Yes, SS contributors get the world map, the catalog manager - I wish istock offered us tools like that.

I also wish istock came up with them first... :-[

That's because Istock spend all their time and (our) money giving holidays to inspectors and the 'in-crowd' in Milan, London, Tokyo, etc.

Istock created F5! It is awesome! And worth of a royalty cut to pay for it!

« Reply #27 on: October 07, 2011, 11:40 »
0
@fujiko - I sincerely hope you're joking.

iStock is still struggling to answer a simple buyer question about whether a clipping path is included with all file sizes or just medium or up (or just the largest size). It's more the fact that they can't answer the question about how their own site works that I find so pitiful.

iStock help forum has people commenting that the search index hasn't updated - earlier this week I had a sale on an image that was approved earlier in the day. If SS can do that, why does iStock routinely take 48 hours or more to update theirs?

If it weren't for Sean's greasemonkey scripts, the iStock my uploads page would be unusable in its latest form.

iStock's software department is a complete shambles, but in addition, they do things like work on a Feast site, and supposedly on supporting PNGs (today's contact sheet had a "we really are still working on this" update for all those who figures that PNGs have gone the way of logos). Heaven knows what will eventually happen to Logos, and although we're forced into the PP there's no sign of independent content actually go there (they said it'd take to the end of the year).

iStock used to lead the way with new features (some of them like the forumeter too awful to continue) but that was when someone who gave a toss about the future of the business was running it (as opposed to the current owners who only care about how much money they can draw from it this year and next).
« Last Edit: October 07, 2011, 15:00 by jsnover »

fujiko

« Reply #28 on: October 07, 2011, 12:01 »
0
@fujiko - I sincerely hope you're joking.

Yes, I was joking.  ;D


Quote
iStock help forum has people commenting that the search index hasn't updated - earlier this week I had a sale on an image that was approved earlier in the day. If SS can do that, why does iStock routinely take 48 hours or more to update theirs?

I believe that the explanation is that their system is so much more complicated than SS because of their many fine tunes, adjustments and modifications to bias the site to the content they want to sell that it's now a huge elephant in a glassware store. Too many conflicting interests and biases that make a mess of the site's code.
I also believe that they create new sites because of this. It's more efficient to create something new rather than try to clean the trunk of the elephant without breaking anything.

« Reply #29 on: October 07, 2011, 12:03 »
0
Yes, SS contributors get the world map, the catalog manager - I wish istock offered us tools like that.

I also wish istock came up with them first... :-[

I think the time when iStock was innovative are firmly in the past now - except, perhaps, for what goes on on the accounting side.

« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2011, 14:54 »
0
Love the new catalog manager. So simple to use, and it's two clicks to publish on Twitter and Facebook with a referral link.

« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2011, 15:32 »
0
I saw this and my initial impression was "cool - I want to make a new catalog for each model I have so I can promote them in every situation that i've photographed them in"...and then I realized I'm limited to 5 options.  I need to figure out how to best optimize the opportunity - I think some thinking is required over the weekend.

You are limited to 5? I don't think so I think you can ''promote'' any number of catalog, but you are only limited to 5 in viewing the earning in your Dashboard?

Carl

  • Carl Stewart, CS Productions
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2011, 22:33 »
0
I'm not sure what referring to by "option."  If you mean "sets," I have 17, most of which contain shots of a particular model, and all of which have been published.

« Reply #33 on: October 08, 2011, 08:01 »
0
Very useful toy. I would have preferred that the values listed were "total earned", RPI and RPD. I know I can calculate them myself, but it would make it easier to see what kind of shoot was more profitable, without doing math.

« Reply #34 on: October 08, 2011, 11:18 »
0
Nice set of tools. I don't see using it very much, but interesting idea.

« Reply #35 on: October 08, 2011, 11:25 »
0
I like the tool, although I'd love to see some more refinements. They did a great job putting this together, and I do hope they'll keep improving it.

So if I create a set with images selected, it puts them in the set automatically. That's good, but Lightroom has a great feature with  a checkbox for including the selected images - in case the selection and set have nothing to do with one another.

I'd love to have the catalog sortable by sales volume, $$, date so I can see if there's one star image or a bunch of good performers. You can click on the gallery stats and get a new window, but that's not sortable by earnings, only by downloads and date; it's also impossible to see most sets in their entirety in the gallery stats view as each entry takes up a ton of space. Nothing like as nice as the newer catalog set window.

I'd like to see icons in the corner (again like Lightroom) for images that are in a set and if you click & hold on that it tells you which set. You might not want to have an image in multiple sets and seeing that you'd already put the image somewhere would be helpful.

I guess the biggie is I'd like any image that is in a set to have a link on the page the customer sees to the rest of the set. It's not what the tool was designed for, but I think it'd work well to show buyers related images (without the stats obviously).

« Reply #36 on: October 08, 2011, 12:09 »
0
I agree w/  jsnover - a good tool but a few refinements would help even more. I'd like to be able to sort by $ and not just dl #s (for all the darkroom stuff).

I like the idea of something on an image page that says "this image is in the X lightbox - click here to see that lightbox". Maybe only for lightboxes you select to be linked lightboxes, that way if you set up a lightbox to show somebody something it won't necessarily show up this way unless you want it to.

Carl

  • Carl Stewart, CS Productions
« Reply #37 on: October 08, 2011, 18:49 »
0
I don't see my latest batch, approved on Oct 4, in the catalog manager.  Hmmmmmm.   ???

RacePhoto

« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2011, 07:18 »
0
I don't see my latest batch, approved on Oct 4, in the catalog manager.  Hmmmmmm.   ???

That was my next stop, mine aren't showing up either, (in catalog manager) but when I go to the regular buyers site, a search by keywords, they are for sale. Same problem with newly accepted files, disappearing from our own section. I hope they get that fixed soon. It doesn't seem to hurt anything but it is disconcerting.

I was out of town for the weekend. Everything is now available in all areas and the new files are added to the Catalog for tracking.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2011, 07:31 by RacePhoto »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
3560 Views
Last post June 21, 2012, 08:58
by tab62
5 Replies
1673 Views
Last post August 24, 2013, 12:20
by Beppe Grillo
9 Replies
3201 Views
Last post January 18, 2016, 02:23
by hairybiker777
3 Replies
1627 Views
Last post August 25, 2017, 02:38
by Mayank
0 Replies
1116 Views
Last post November 29, 2017, 00:28
by unnonimus

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results