Author Topic: Fast Fast Fast reviews? (Read 6492 times)

RacePhoto · « **on:** March 10, 2010, 18:34 »

I finally got around to this weeks ten for SS. Just went to look for the payment data for the survey and they are already accepted.

This is to the point where it's not how many days anymore, it's how many hours.

donding · « **Reply #1 on:** March 10, 2010, 18:52 »

Quote from: RacePhoto on March 10, 2010, 18:34

I finally got around to this weeks ten for SS. Just went to look for the payment data for the survey and they are already accepted.

This is to the point where it's not how many days anymore, it's how many hours.

Maybe they hired all the out of work StockXpert reviewers and they helped lighten the load...

mantonino · « **Reply #2 on:** March 10, 2010, 19:04 »

Submitted at 3:23pm, accepted 6:23 pm. Fast!

luissantos84 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 10, 2010, 20:30 »

Quote from: mantonino on March 10, 2010, 19:04

Submitted at 3:23pm, accepted 6:23 pm. Fast!

curious mine is taking more than 24h, not usual..

WarrenPrice · « **Reply #4 on:** March 10, 2010, 20:53 »

Me too, Luis. I'm getting a complex.

RacePhoto · « **Reply #5 on:** March 10, 2010, 20:58 »

Quote from: luissantos84 on March 10, 2010, 20:30

Quote from: mantonino on March 10, 2010, 19:04
Submitted at 3:23pm, accepted 6:23 pm. Fast!

curious mine is taking more than 24h, not usual..

Could be luck of the draw, a reviewer was working middle of the day, US time and I hit it right. Just got the emails. Review took 1 hour 26 minutes. Also all editorial which might make a difference?

luissantos84 · « **Reply #6 on:** March 10, 2010, 21:12 »

Quote from: RacePhoto on March 10, 2010, 20:58

Quote from: luissantos84 on March 10, 2010, 20:30
Quote from: mantonino on March 10, 2010, 19:04
Submitted at 3:23pm, accepted 6:23 pm. Fast!

curious mine is taking more than 24h, not usual..

Could be luck of the draw, a reviewer was working middle of the day, US time and I hit it right. Just got the emails. Review took 1 hour 26 minutes. Also all editorial which might make a difference?

don't know, its from a major event??

mantonino · « **Reply #7 on:** March 10, 2010, 21:32 »

Just to keep the info flowing - my batch had no models at all - probably an easier review with no MR checks.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #8 on:** March 10, 2010, 21:53 »

Quote from: mantonino on March 10, 2010, 21:32

Just to keep the info flowing - my batch had no models at all - probably an easier review with no MR checks.

hmmmm... got a lot but from the same model..! last week was fast like always.. don't know!

Ploink · « **Reply #9 on:** March 11, 2010, 01:04 »

Quote from: RacePhoto on March 10, 2010, 20:58

Review took 1 hour 26 minutes. Also all editorial which might make a difference?

Editorial or not definitely makes a difference - my editorials are constantly reviewed well below 24 hours, sometimes less than 6 hours, my commercials take usually longer than 36 hours - so there are two seperate queues, same as Dreamstime...

tamasvargyasi · « **Reply #10 on:** March 11, 2010, 02:50 »

I got pretty fast reviews until a month ago, or something like that, but now it takes 48 hours to review the files. Just my experience.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #11 on:** March 11, 2010, 10:14 »

Quote from: tamasvargyasi on March 11, 2010, 02:50

I got pretty fast reviews until a month ago, or something like that, but now it takes 48 hours to review the files. Just my experience.

more than 48h and nothing...

hofhoek · « **Reply #12 on:** March 17, 2010, 02:53 »

It's much slower than I'm used to and worst is the rejection rate these days. Images which have been approved at istock now are rejected in whole batches for strange reasons.