MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.  (Read 3684 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 06, 2017, 07:29 »
+1
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.


« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2017, 08:19 »
+2
I don't find this page to be SS stupid decision.

« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2017, 09:31 »
+1
I don't find this page to be SS stupid decision.
Agreed Whats the problem?

Stopcomplaining

« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2017, 10:00 »
+2
Just another complaint- I will add this one to my growing list of complaints  ;)


« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2017, 10:23 »
+3
Hey, Stopcomplaining.  Some of us, if we didn't have this forum to vent on, would explode.

Yes, complaining does not accomplish much.

Sometimes, it does get the attention of the sites we're complaining about, and they act on it.

But, Shutterstock never comes here.  So, yeah, complaining about them here doesn't do anything but vent.

Guess what?  We're still going to do it. 


« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2017, 10:35 »
0
I'm hoping they will add the toggles soon.

Stopcomplaining

« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2017, 10:40 »
0
Hey, Stopcomplaining.  Some of us, if we didn't have this forum to vent on, would explode.

Yes, complaining does not accomplish much.

Sometimes, it does get the attention of the sites we're complaining about, and they act on it.

But, Shutterstock never comes here.  So, yeah, complaining about them here doesn't do anything but vent.

Guess what?  We're still going to do it.

Yeah, Scott (ex- ss guy) use to come on our site and our voices actually helped at that time- seems like a million years ago.  I feel either you accept what is as what is and live with it.   Okay, I do complain but to my cat since he actually listens to me  :(


Chichikov

« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2017, 10:47 »
0
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Chichikov

« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2017, 10:49 »
+1
Just another complaint- I will add this one to my growing list of complaints  ;)

Add my complaint about your complaints to your list about people complaining
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 10:52 by Chichikov »

« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2017, 13:03 »
+3
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2017, 07:29 »
+1
I kinda like the new page.  :)

Chichikov

« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2017, 07:42 »
0
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities
« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 07:48 by Chichikov »

« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2017, 14:20 »
0
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities

It wasn't called "Top performer", it was something else I don't remember!

« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2017, 14:45 »
0
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities

It wasn't called "Top performer", it was something else I don't remember!

top performer is to boost our ego, you know!  it's like all those other "used to be so great with SS!"
... now that it's not 7/10 entry criteron, $35 payout, SOD $28 to 102 joining the dodo bird extinction,etc..
the only thing that will make us happy is to look at...
(you guessed it)... top performer!!!
.. like... oh wow, i made $$$$$$ with this one shot. oh wow, this is so cool , i must frame this
where everyone can see!!!

the problem with the old but very simple and does it job page is that it shows you in
very large size... how (cough).. little you are earning day to day..
but thank goodness the payout is $35 (phew)...

or else where are we going to afford to pay for our six packs !!! 8) 8) 8)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
6 Replies
3934 Views
Last post October 26, 2006, 16:22
by FourSeasons
5 Replies
2509 Views
Last post April 03, 2008, 12:06
by Lee Torrens
12 Replies
3123 Views
Last post January 12, 2014, 23:03
by Jo Ann Snover
11 Replies
2877 Views
Last post February 01, 2015, 15:47
by Snow
29 Replies
7285 Views
Last post October 19, 2015, 09:52
by DavidArts

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle