MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => Shutterstock.com => Topic started by: mike935 on February 06, 2017, 07:29

Title: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: mike935 on February 06, 2017, 07:29
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Artist on February 06, 2017, 08:19
I don't find this page to be SS stupid decision.
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Pauws99 on February 06, 2017, 09:31
I don't find this page to be SS stupid decision.
Agreed Whats the problem?
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Stopcomplaining on February 06, 2017, 10:00
Just another complaint- I will add this one to my growing list of complaints  ;)

Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Hannafate on February 06, 2017, 10:23
Hey, Stopcomplaining.  Some of us, if we didn't have this forum to vent on, would explode.

Yes, complaining does not accomplish much.

Sometimes, it does get the attention of the sites we're complaining about, and they act on it.

But, Shutterstock never comes here.  So, yeah, complaining about them here doesn't do anything but vent.

Guess what?  We're still going to do it. 

Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: JetCityImage on February 06, 2017, 10:35
I'm hoping they will add the toggles soon.
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Stopcomplaining on February 06, 2017, 10:40
Hey, Stopcomplaining.  Some of us, if we didn't have this forum to vent on, would explode.

Yes, complaining does not accomplish much.

Sometimes, it does get the attention of the sites we're complaining about, and they act on it.

But, Shutterstock never comes here.  So, yeah, complaining about them here doesn't do anything but vent.

Guess what?  We're still going to do it.

Yeah, Scott (ex- ss guy) use to come on our site and our voices actually helped at that time- seems like a million years ago.  I feel either you accept what is as what is and live with it.   Okay, I do complain but to my cat since he actually listens to me  :(

Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Chichikov on February 06, 2017, 10:47
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Chichikov on February 06, 2017, 10:49
Just another complaint- I will add this one to my growing list of complaints  ;)

Add my complaint about your complaints to your list about people complaining……
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Fairplay on February 06, 2017, 13:03
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Jakob on February 10, 2017, 07:29
I kinda like the new page.  :)
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Chichikov on February 10, 2017, 07:42
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience…  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: Fairplay on February 10, 2017, 14:20
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience…  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities

It wasn't called "Top performer", it was something else I don't remember!
Title: Re: New top performers page. Another Shutterstock's stupid decision.
Post by: etudiante_rapide on February 10, 2017, 14:45
https://submit.shutterstock.com/earnings/top-performers/

Has anyone kept link to the old page? I hope it is still there. New page does not allow to choose new images first.

Why should we have the possibility to put new image first in a page about top performers??

Because this was the only way to see the performance of new images in order by upload date. It was very helpful for me and a lot of contributors in my country shared in a forum they are not happy with this change too.
I can't understand how hard is SS to give us the opportunity to sort images by: Total Earnings, Total Downloads and Upload Date

I see very hardly a new image  being a top performer.
(It is a little like when I see job offers asking for young people with 30 years of experience…  ;D)
Or we have not the same understanding of the meaning of "Top performer".

But I agree that Shutterstock should give us more possibilities

It wasn't called "Top performer", it was something else I don't remember!

top performer is to boost our ego, you know!  it's like all those other "used to be so great with SS!"
... now that it's not 7/10 entry criteron, $35 payout, SOD $28 to 102 joining the dodo bird extinction,etc..
the only thing that will make us happy is to look at...
(you guessed it)... top performer!!!
.. like... oh wow, i made $$$$$$ with this one shot. oh wow, this is so cool , i must frame this
where everyone can see!!!

the problem with the old but very simple and does it job page is that it shows you in
very large size... how (cough).. little you are earning day to day..
but thank goodness the payout is $35 (phew)...

or else where are we going to afford to pay for our six packs !!! 8) 8) 8)