pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: OffSet photos on Shutterstock.  (Read 3312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: October 01, 2023, 22:42 »
0
I don't why some of those OffSet photos are premium going for $249 minimum while our photos only get $0.10 90% of the times. 

https://www.shutterstock.com/search/man?image_type=photo

OffSet photos on this particular keyword search actually look inferior to most other photos.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2023, 22:45 by blvdone »


« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2023, 01:46 »
+1
I don't why some of those OffSet photos are premium going for $249 minimum while our photos only get $0.10 90% of the times. 

https://www.shutterstock.com/search/man?image_type=photo

OffSet photos on this particular keyword search actually look inferior to most other photos.

Because offset is a different agency (run by Shutterstock) with different prices and more selective with whom they allow in.

Does that mean the quality is better of the images on Shutterstock? Probably not.  Many good photographers might simply never have applied to them. Or they applied in the past were rejected and have improved a lot. At the beginning offset used to be "invite only" even.

I think the only real difference between offset and shutterstock is that on offset you can expect a certain quality, while on shutterstock every cell-phone snapshot crap gets approved. This means that you can only find good photos on offset, but on shuttersock you can find images just as good or even better - but also all the crap.
From a customers point of view I do not see much use in browsing the SS gallery and buying offset photos there. To me it only makes sense to go directly to the offset gallery and pay higher prices there just for the luxury of not having to browse through hundreds of medicore cell phone snap shots.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2023, 01:51 by Her Ugliness »

« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2023, 08:00 »
+1
It is an edited collection, i.e. the customer saves a lot of time. Also the images will not be downloaded thousands of times.

So with the higher price, although you get no exclusive rm use, you can usually be confident that very few people are using your image.

It also unlikely that thousands of blogs around the world will start buying the file once they see you using it.

And usually you will get more personal service if you buy in the higher end collections. Agencies will have staff prepare a galerie for your brief to choose from etc...

wds

« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2023, 16:41 »
+1
Usually, successful images on an agency end up with a high ranking (and therefore there is not a lot to wade through on search results), and usually those successful images are "good". I always found it hard to understand the ridiculous pricing difference between these collections for what many times is the same quality of image in the "cheap seats". Is the curation really worth what must be $10000's per year?
« Last Edit: October 02, 2023, 16:43 by wds »

« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2023, 19:15 »
0
Usually, successful images on an agency end up with a high ranking (and therefore there is not a lot to wade through on search results), and usually those successful images are "good". I always found it hard to understand the ridiculous pricing difference between these collections for what many times is the same quality of image in the "cheap seats". Is the curation really worth what must be $10000's per year?

Exactly.  Those OffSet photos showing up on top pages aren't any better than other $0.10 cheap sub photos.  It just doesn't make sense.

« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2023, 02:24 »
0
Usually, successful images on an agency end up with a high ranking (and therefore there is not a lot to wade through on search results), and usually those successful images are "good". I always found it hard to understand the ridiculous pricing difference between these collections for what many times is the same quality of image in the "cheap seats". Is the curation really worth what must be $10000's per year?

Exactly.  Those OffSet photos showing up on top pages aren't any better than other $0.10 cheap sub photos.  It just doesn't make sense.

But it makes money.

Lots of producers only create content for those highly priced, high end collections.

Getting into the club is the problem.



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
178 Replies
55177 Views
Last post April 10, 2013, 20:08
by gostwyck
16 Replies
6494 Views
Last post March 20, 2015, 20:33
by 60D
7 Replies
10619 Views
Last post April 15, 2015, 21:47
by onepointfour
20 Replies
9407 Views
Last post December 02, 2015, 12:10
by Monty-m-gue
15 Replies
6407 Views
Last post December 28, 2015, 05:14
by MxR

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors