Website completly down for a long time some days ago, always trouble with CSV and now its not possible to delete rejected photos.

1: Go to your backend and choose rejected
2: scroll down and click on "show all rejected photos"
3: try to click the red cross for "delete" with any image

all red crosses lead to: http://buz</div%3E%3C/td%3E%3Ctd%20align=center%3E%C2%A0%3Ca%20href=

oh boy...
did they let their interns practice some coding?

It is never good when a site is plagued with constant bugs. How many business sites have you used that have as many bugs as these microsites do?  If SS put as much effort into site development as they did on the recent IPO, we would not be having these prolonged issues.

Quote from: tickstock on October 07, 2013, 13:14

Looks like it works to me but who cares if it doesn't, is it important for you to delete those files?

Try to resubmit / reupload a former rejected (and now corrected) file without deleting the old one.
Then you will know.

I don't know for sure, but do the inspectors really have time to go dig through your rejected file thumbnails to see if you are re-upping something that's already been rejected? Then compare whether you have comments inserted for that images (or images)? That would take eons to do...but who knows, you may be spot on. Just doesn't seem like a fluid, productive way to inspect.

And the SS rejections they have are.

This image is already in your portfolio. Do not resubmit.

"Please provide a note to the reviewer when deleting previously accepted images and resubmitting them."

"Please contact support before resubmitting previously approved images â?? [email protected]"

"this file was previously rejected. Do not resubmit"

Quote from: Mantis on October 08, 2013, 07:20

Quote from: Axel Lauer on October 08, 2013, 02:02

Quote from: tickstock on October 07, 2013, 13:14

Looks like it works to me but who cares if it doesn't, is it important for you to delete those files?

Try to resubmit / reupload a former rejected (and now corrected) file without deleting the old one.
Then you will know.

I don't know for sure, but do the inspectors really have time to go dig through your rejected file thumbnails to see if you are re-upping something that's already been rejected? Then compare whether you have comments inserted for that images (or images)? That would take eons to do...but who knows, you may be spot on. Just doesn't seem like a fluid, productive way to inspect.

I got that rejection, so there must be something that tells them the image is already in your port?