You can - comment for reviewer is part of the standard submission process

Sorry, I see no comment box anywhere.

When you submit there's no note to the reviewer box? I get one every time right after I hit submit? What kind of system are you using?



Meanwhile, yes, correct the lighting or white balance and re-submit, but don't do what the banned ones did and just keep sending the same files in hopes of getting a lucky review. They do track them.

Anyway, you can do them all at once and just say images have been corrected, in the "Notes For Reviewer"

Anyone else that doesn't get this screen?

DOH! Yes, I see it now. Was looking in the wrong place.

Some of my images that have been refused are on the basis of lighting or WB. Am I allowed to re-submit without being suspended ? I am reluctant because there is no option of writing a note to the reviewer.

If I can correct the reason for the rejection, I always re-submit. Always with a note to the reviewer that this is a re-submit and what was corrected. Many of those are accepted on the second try, so I do think it is worthwhile.
I never had any problems or warnings - but I would recommend NOT to re-submit without a clear statement to the reviewer.

Not only technical requirements are different, but also the type of photos that sell; you just might find out many of your bestsellers at IS won't sell well at SS or won't sell at all and vice versa. Besides many of your bestsellers sell, because they're selling well for years, but if you uploaded them again (at IS), some wouldn't sell as well or wouldn't sell at all, since there so much more competition and some are surely outdated.

However it's true that a really good photo will sell everywhere (if it is up to today's technical standards and not outdated of course). But it's just curious how some, just a small percentage of files, sells great at just one site. And I mean getting over 90% of the revenue at just one site.