MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Shutterstock earnings in July....  (Read 19560 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: August 01, 2016, 08:50 »
+9
Wow. My July SS payout was the lowest since Sep 2007!  :(


« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2016, 08:51 »
0
worst month this year... but somehow i expect that

« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2016, 08:58 »
0
Two big single and other sales in the second half of the month transformed July.  Was heading for my worst month in years but finished just short of July last year.

alno

« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2016, 09:00 »
0
Close to best month which was May. But I started about a year ago.

« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2016, 09:07 »
+8
Compared to July 2015:
Size of the port: +51%
Income: -8%

During that time I reached top tier. I changed my gears from semi-pro to pro. Quality of my files have definitely increased.

I don't know why I'm still in this business.  :'(
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 09:33 by 60D »

« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2016, 09:12 »
+3
Compared to July 2015:
Size of the port: +51%
Income: -8%

During that time I reached top tier. I changed my gears from semi-pro to pro. Quality of my files have definitely increased.

I don't know why I still in this business.  :'(

It sounds like you are at the point where you need to look at macro sites and sell there. It just doesn't make any sense now to invest in better equipment and improve your skills and stay in microstock.  :(

« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2016, 09:13 »
+8
Diabolical - 50% down on July 2015 - worst month for about three years

On the plus side it has given me the boot up the arse I needed to get cracking on other business outside of microstock


« Reply #7 on: August 01, 2016, 09:18 »
+1
Best month this year.
I uploaded a new photo (editorial) that sold the day I uploaded it and one or more times a day since then which was nice, though the big jump in earnings came from SOD sales and not that image. It's just nice to see new images selling steadily. My main focus has always been outside microstock, but for certain images, including some American editorial subjects, SS is my best choice for stock.

Justanotherphotographer

« Reply #8 on: August 01, 2016, 09:30 »
+1
Really bad month on SS, down something like 15% on last year even with a much larger (and better quality) portfolio.

FL and 123 are up, but not enough to make up for the decline in SS and IS

« Reply #9 on: August 01, 2016, 09:32 »
+1
It sounds like you are at the point where you need to look at macro sites and sell there. It just doesn't make any sense now to invest in better equipment and improve your skills and stay in microstock.  :(

I started to upload to Alamy and Getty. But I got tired of Alamy's upload system very quickly. I get better RPI and RPD at Getty. But due to some of their rules (cannot delete files, cannot modify keywords, etc.), I hesitate to send them more files.

marthamarks

« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2016, 09:33 »
0
July turned out to be my 2nd best month this year. But that only happened in the last few days, when 3 large SODs came in. Before that, it was a complete bust. Go figure!

« Reply #11 on: August 01, 2016, 09:39 »
0
July turned out to be my 2nd best month this year. But that only happened in the last few days, when 3 large SODs came in. Before that, it was a complete bust. Go figure!
It's the second best month in this year for me as well, but how is it compared to July 2015?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 09:46 by 60D »

« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2016, 09:42 »
+2
Pretty bad month here, especialy, because I had one of the worst months for ODD sales.

« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2016, 10:10 »
+1
I only do footage and at SS I have had the exact same amount in $ in the last 4 months!
It is really strange, if the month starts well and I reach that sum, then I don't get anymore uploads. If the month starts very poorly, I have a big increase in the last week, just enough to reach the same exact total

THP Creative

  • THP Creative

« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2016, 10:18 »
0
Was going to be terrible, but 7 footage sales in one day made it acceptable. About average.

« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2016, 10:27 »
+2
Seems SS has become a fixed income source for many  ;)

« Reply #16 on: August 01, 2016, 10:38 »
0
2 big sods and a couple of reasonable sods made it a poor month


« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2016, 10:50 »
0
no big sod, as i said , it disappears almost 2 years ago.
it was as stockastic said, these big sod that rescued us each month from a disaster month.

july, again reach the same download total but earning is 50% less

does that mean ss has decreased the prices per dl ,etc??? can anyone tell me???
how do you reach the same download plateau for the past months
but end up with so much less $$$$ in earnings?

new images? increased upload  but dls is dismal in percentage to what was uploaded.
most of the earnings are from images undiscovered and the usual sellers.
you no longer need to can feed the beast to increase earnings

the mystery is my download number always stay the same (+- 10)
ie. say your dl monthly is 3160 , it comes in total  3158, 3159, 3163,3156,etc..
and they say there is no flip switch???

gyllens

« Reply #18 on: August 01, 2016, 11:06 »
+4
Diabolical down 50% plus. Have around 22000 files there and I really feel this is it with SS. We keep blaming the search but I am not sure anymore. Could very well be and against all odds they are losing buyers?
Like some others I will also upload much more to Getty.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 11:09 by gyllens »

« Reply #19 on: August 01, 2016, 11:23 »
0
Worst July since 2014

« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2016, 11:33 »
0
June was my BME, July is 2nd worst after January in this year

« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2016, 11:51 »
+5
Diabolical down 50% plus. Have around 22000 files there and I really feel this is it with SS. We keep blaming the search but I am not sure anymore. Could very well be and against all odds they are losing buyers?
Like some others I will also upload much more to Getty.

red-  for many of us , yes ! but still someone(s) keeps saying it's his best month ever ;)

getty? you not fear their no deletion rule???
i am afraid of anything connected to istock,really!!! once beaten twice shy and now ss is
waiting with a pole shoving and lubrication job...

« Reply #22 on: August 01, 2016, 12:14 »
+1
Good news and bad news for July.

It was the best month this year for $$, by a small margin.

It was down nearly 18% in $$ over July 2015 where downloads were essentially the same (8 fewer)

I have a portfolio of just over 2000 images and I have added quite a few images this year after adding very few last year. The good news is that a large chunk of the new stuff is selling and getting good search position. Not surprising as remodeling is a good category. Summer is always slow, but it's a shame that lots of new images haven't boosted the download numbers (unless you count the fact that they didn't fall as a boost?)

As with other months this year, the big change is the loss of high-value SODs. I did have two hand-processed ELs this month which is probably why July beat March.

Dook

« Reply #23 on: August 01, 2016, 12:15 »
0
Diabolical down 50% plus. Have around 22000 files there and I really feel this is it with SS. We keep blaming the search but I am not sure anymore. Could very well be and against all odds they are losing buyers?
Like some others I will also upload much more to Getty.
How do you guys upload to Getty?

angelawaye

  • Eat, Sleep, Keyword. Repeat

« Reply #24 on: August 01, 2016, 12:34 »
+1
I'm really glad I'm not alone. July 2016 has been the worst earnings month in several years. June was bad not not as bad as July. I'm bracing myself for August as Monday doesn't seem to be going very well so far ...

The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

« Reply #25 on: August 01, 2016, 12:42 »
0
I'm really glad I'm not alone. July 2016 has been the worst earnings month in several years. June was bad not not as bad as July. I'm bracing myself for August as Monday doesn't seem to be going very well so far ...

The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

i am looking at the worldwide listing of summer vacation, and it is mostly july to sept.
although we need not to refer to that since here, we are all from around the globe
so we all know when it is vacation time.

we will see if august is still vacation time, or a return to better earnings.
maybe all of you from your country can chime in on this to tell us if you think
ss earnings is down 50% due to summer vacation
or as gyllens says ... losing buyers.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #26 on: August 01, 2016, 13:38 »
+2
Surely people who have been around for years can easily compare to previous Julys / whatever ?


« Reply #27 on: August 01, 2016, 13:47 »
+2
Worst month since 2010.
My sales were already falling steadily but then took a real dive back to almost nothing towards the end of June and haven't picked up again.

« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2016, 13:47 »
+1
Can anybody explain me this theory of constant earnings month after months, regardless of files uploaded or seasonal shifts.
It certainly defies logic. Is the a big brother watching and making sure we earn the same exact amount month after month?
OTOH, what about if someone stop uploading? Will he keep earning exactly the same amount for the rest of his life?

angelawaye

  • Eat, Sleep, Keyword. Repeat

« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2016, 13:49 »
+7
I've been doing this since 2008 and never have experienced this kind of downfall - it isn't just a summer month. Looks like I may have to go back to web/graphic design within the year...

« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2016, 13:51 »
0
Can anybody explain me this theory of constant earnings month after months, regardless of files uploaded or seasonal shifts.
It certainly defies logic. Is the a big brother watching and making sure we earn the same exact amount month after month?
OTOH, what about if someone stop uploading? Will he keep earning exactly the same amount for the rest of his life?

no, not the same amount, but the same number of downloads. if you understand my asking about
flip-switch.
if i earn the same amount each month, i would be a happy camper.
but no, i accumulate the same number of downloads, but my dollar and cents earning is
sliding month to month.
how you explain that? confused for sure.

as for the other question, no... uploading more new images
is not the solution.  i uploaded a lot of new images
far better works than ever, but they hardly see any downloads.

instead ,my undiscovered images get downloaded . images so old and creepily bad,
i forgot i had them in my port. go figure!!!
Surely people who have been around for years can easily compare to previous Julys / whatever ?

yes, to me like most here, it's a downhill slope comparing to previous years.
but , as i said, my download total is always the same; only the earnings keep falling.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 13:54 by etudiante_rapide »

« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2016, 14:12 »
+2
Sounds like I'm not alone. I usually make my min. about halfway through the month; but this July I barely squeeked under the wire at the last minute.

« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2016, 14:19 »
0
Revenue was 10% lower than June, but that's almost expected. Had a huge month in June with some large SODs and I knew it was hard to match.  Download numbers were about 3% lower than June, which is normal in a month with a big holiday.

In the first half of July, FT was tracking higher than SS by 15%. By the end of the month, SS caught up and surpassed FT. And that's why you can't underestimate SS. FT has higher RPI, but SS has those large downloads that can change the tide.

« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2016, 14:32 »
+4
Surely people who have been around for years can easily compare to previous Julys / whatever ?

Here is my July yearly comparisons. I showed a steady climb from July to July (except 2009), as long as I was uploading. In 2012, I stopped uploading, so naturally sales would decline. Is the decline solely because I haven't been uploading? I doubt it. I am thinking that the larger drop from 2013 to 2014 is partly because of changes on SS's end, too...you know, the general decline in sales that everyone has been talking about. Glean from it whatever you will.

gyllens

« Reply #34 on: August 01, 2016, 15:01 »
0
Can anybody explain me this theory of constant earnings month after months, regardless of files uploaded or seasonal shifts.
It certainly defies logic. Is the a big brother watching and making sure we earn the same exact amount month after month?
OTOH, what about if someone stop uploading? Will he keep earning exactly the same amount for the rest of his life?

Thanks for that. I thought I was going mad. I have seen that for the last seven month's and its quite acceptible if the earnings are good but if this July is anything to go by any more uploading is just a waste.

« Reply #35 on: August 01, 2016, 15:53 »
0
Surely people who have been around for years can easily compare to previous Julys / whatever ?

Here is my July yearly comparisons. I showed a steady climb from July to July (except 2009), as long as I was uploading. In 2012, I stopped uploading, so naturally sales would decline. Is the decline solely because I haven't been uploading? I doubt it. I am thinking that the larger drop from 2013 to 2014 is partly because of changes on SS's end, too...you know, the general decline in sales that everyone has been talking about. Glean from it whatever you will.

freefall, .. shame!

but the things is , cathy, it's not a decline in sales as you say.
i get the same number of downloads each month . ..but the $ amount drops.
so, ss is not losing sales. it's the $ that ends up in my pocket that keeps dropping
while the sales (downloads) remain consistent.

how do you explain that?  either i am not getting my share of the commissions
or ss is keep a larger part of it. i am lost in figuring the answer.

« Reply #36 on: August 01, 2016, 16:01 »
+3
Can anybody explain me this theory of constant earnings month after months, regardless of files uploaded or seasonal shifts.
It certainly defies logic. Is the a big brother watching and making sure we earn the same exact amount month after month?
OTOH, what about if someone stop uploading? Will he keep earning exactly the same amount for the rest of his life?

If you look at my chart, the answer is no, if you stop uploading you don't keep earning the same amount for the rest of your life. Unfortunately.

Almost like they put a cap on how much a person can earn, and you never go over that cap. If you do, they jimmy the numbers so it all comes out below your cap and they keep the rest. Of course that sounds like tinfoil hat material when I type it, but frankly I don't have much faith in any large company nowadays. And no one will ever convince me that what I just said IS paranoia, and NEVER happens. Companies cook the books all the time.


« Reply #37 on: August 01, 2016, 16:01 »
0
My July earnings are mostly flat with a smaller modest portfolio. One question I have genuinely been wondering about. Since so many contributors are seeing such a drastic reduction in sales and earnings why is the MSG SS contributor earnings graph line showing a fairly significant spike in earnings for July.

Could it be more newbies reporting sales since SS has dropped their entrance requirements? Or is it that some contributors are doing much better while some are doing worse due to changing search algorithms? Or some other entirely different reason?


« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2016, 16:02 »
+1
all of the above

« Reply #39 on: August 01, 2016, 16:03 »
+2
freefall, .. shame!

but the things is , cathy, it's not a decline in sales as you say.
i get the same number of downloads each month . ..but the $ amount drops.
so, ss is not losing sales. it's the $ that ends up in my pocket that keeps dropping
while the sales (downloads) remain consistent.

how do you explain that?  either i am not getting my share of the commissions
or ss is keep a larger part of it. i am lost in figuring the answer.

That right there. IMO

« Reply #40 on: August 01, 2016, 16:05 »
+2
ss is not keeping a bigger part of your earnings

analyse your sales reports instead of asking other people why your sales are down. cant be that hard to figure out. sales the same, earnings down, means you have more lower paid downloads and less of the higher paid downloads, there you go

nothing to do with ss taking a bigger cut, they take a fixed percentage

« Reply #41 on: August 01, 2016, 16:16 »
+2
Can anybody explain me this theory of constant earnings month after months, regardless of files uploaded or seasonal shifts.
It certainly defies logic. Is the a big brother watching and making sure we earn the same exact amount month after month?
OTOH, what about if someone stop uploading? Will he keep earning exactly the same amount for the rest of his life?

If you look at my chart, the answer is no, if you stop uploading you don't keep earning the same amount for the rest of your life. Unfortunately.

Almost like they put a cap on how much a person can earn,
and you never go over that cap. If you do, they jimmy the numbers so it all comes out below your cap and they keep the rest. Of course that sounds like tinfoil hat material when I type it, but frankly I don't have much faith in any large company nowadays. And no one will ever convince me that what I just said IS paranoia, and NEVER happens. Companies cook the books all the time.

- echo - in red
you explain it better than i could.
and no, it's not paranoia
and yes, they do cook the books...

but of course, there will always be someone coming in to tell you it's not true
because there's a little block head / fan boy somewhere in every community  ;D

« Reply #42 on: August 01, 2016, 16:23 »
+1
We had a pretty good month in total income on SS. Third July in the business so with much larger port in 2016 than 2015, it's hard to compare with total earnings. Profit per image this July was on the low end for the year (2nd worst month of 2016) and was about 2/3 of profit per image from July 2015. So even though it seemed like a good month, the findings are mixed.

« Reply #43 on: August 01, 2016, 16:41 »
+3
Worst month since Dec 2012!
Big sudden drop in July 2016, almost 30% less $$$ than June 2016!
There's no natural reason for this! I'm sure SS did some drastic change which resulted in such a great loss of income for most of the contributors in top earning tier!  >:(

« Reply #44 on: August 01, 2016, 18:40 »
0
Sounds like I'm not alone. I usually make my min. about halfway through the month; but this July I barely squeeked under the wire at the last minute.

Yep. I never missed a monthly payout since July 2008, but last month I wondered if I was going to miss payout for the first time in 8 years!

« Reply #45 on: August 01, 2016, 20:01 »
+1
I'm up slightly from last July. I've been contributing for 4 years now. BTW, all agencies up marginally from last July except P5 and 123rf. They're down marginally. I shoot a wide range of subject matter.

50%

« Reply #46 on: August 02, 2016, 03:52 »
+3
10% down from  last July I'm not surprised this will be the norm for pretty much everyone who doing this for a decade.


ngaga35

« Reply #47 on: August 02, 2016, 08:18 »
+1
July 2016 is 22% less then July 2015, and 40% less then July 2014  It very bed!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chichikov

« Reply #48 on: August 02, 2016, 08:42 »
0
July, what July?

« Reply #49 on: August 02, 2016, 09:09 »
+4
July 2016 is 22% less then July 2015, and 40% less then July 2014  It very bed!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

your best works come with spam in the titles, sorry couldn't resist..  those SS "spammy titles" emails are so fresh in my memory :)

« Reply #50 on: August 02, 2016, 09:56 »
0
The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

I hope you have them RF on Alamy and not RM - once you've sold them on the micros you can't sell them as RM on Alamy or anywhere else, because you have no idea how they are being used.  If someone thinks they are getting exclusive use and then they find it all over the place they could sue you.

If they are RF on Alamy then you also can sell them on the micros so there is no need to be exclusive.  It is safer to leave your best sellers on the micros and just put new images exclusive on Alamy.  However, I think you will be disappointed at sales volume on Alamy.

« Reply #51 on: August 02, 2016, 09:59 »
0
For me SS had the fewest DLs in July since August of 2011.  Clip sales kept revenue from being a disaster.

I've hardly uploaded anything during the past 1.5 years so that might have something to do with it.

ngaga35

« Reply #52 on: August 02, 2016, 10:01 »
0
July 2016 is 22% less then July 2015, and 40% less then July 2014  It very bed!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

your best works come with spam in the titles, sorry couldn't resist..  those SS "spammy titles" emails are so fresh in my memory :)
Those was my research in last ten days to try to increase sales. And those are not my best works.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

« Reply #53 on: August 02, 2016, 11:20 »
0
My sales were pretty flat, but I have come to accept this kind of thing from Microstock.  As many out there, I just don't see this as sustainable, but for some reason I keep contributing.  What other marketing can I do with my images that requires so little effort on my part?  Nothing really.

« Reply #54 on: August 02, 2016, 11:25 »
0
The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

I hope you have them RF on Alamy and not RM - once you've sold them on the micros you can't sell them as RM on Alamy or anywhere else, because you have no idea how they are being used.  If someone thinks they are getting exclusive use and then they find it all over the place they could sue you.

If they are RF on Alamy then you also can sell them on the micros so there is no need to be exclusive.  It is safer to leave your best sellers on the micros and just put new images exclusive on Alamy.  However, I think you will be disappointed at sales volume on Alamy.


I sell several a year at Alamy, but that is pretty much it.  As far as RM, it is up to you to remove the image form the micros if they want exclusive use. Other than that you are fine.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #55 on: August 02, 2016, 11:59 »
0
The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

I hope you have them RF on Alamy and not RM - once you've sold them on the micros you can't sell them as RM on Alamy or anywhere else, because you have no idea how they are being used.  If someone thinks they are getting exclusive use and then they find it all over the place they could sue you.

Not strictly true. You can't have a file RF anywhere and RM on Alamy at the same time, as per the Alamy contract; but an official Alamy rep posted on here that if your file was previously RF, and you remove it from all RF outlets, you can list it RM on Alamy. However, in the very rare occasions that a buyer might want exclusivity, Alamy will contact you and you must inform that it previously sold as RF.

Quote
If they are RF on Alamy then you also can sell them on the micros so there is no need to be exclusive.  It is safer to leave your best sellers on the micros and just put new images exclusive on Alamy.  However, I think you will be disappointed at sales volume on Alamy.
Sadly, I have to agree with you about sales volume on Alamy.  :(
« Last Edit: August 02, 2016, 12:15 by ShadySue »

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #56 on: August 02, 2016, 12:19 »
0
  As far as RM, it is up to you to remove the image form the micros if they want exclusive use. Other than that you are fine.

According to your agreement with Alamy,
"2.2 You cannot submit identical or similar Images to Alamy as both Royalty Free and Rights Managed. The licence type on Alamy for an Image must be the same as the licence type for that Image and similar Images which you have on other agency websites."
http://www.alamy.com/terms/contributor.asp


« Reply #57 on: August 02, 2016, 14:09 »
+1
July turned out to be my 2nd best month this year. But that only happened in the last few days, when 3 large SODs came in. Before that, it was a complete bust. Go figure!
and if those sales came a few days later it would have made Aug look better --
this is why comparing this jul to 2015 isn't really meaningful  - when a few SOD,EL make the difference between a good and bad month, the only real way to compare current earnings is by looking at 3 or more months at a time

and using the first few days of a month to predict the month's total is only valid if you have a consistent, stable pattern of sales; for most of us, the pattern is more likely to be a sawtooth than a straight line

for me  this year is about 1% better than 2015, but 2015 was 18% better than 2014,

but my jul comparisons with 2015 and 2014 show  +10% and -15% , since jul 2015 was not a great month and jul 2014 had some particularly good EL sales - so the monthly sales don't track well with yearly averages

comparing 2015 rolling averages for  3 months and 6 months, 2016 shows -7% and +1%
for 2014, the numbers are -1% and +7%

so, while closer, even 3 or 6 mo rolling averages don't predict annual earnings very well - the input data is just too noisy

conclusion -- don't pay a lot of attention to daily or even monthly totals or comparisons, but rather track longer terms trend

and more importantly, YOUR mileage WILL vary

angelawaye

  • Eat, Sleep, Keyword. Repeat

« Reply #58 on: August 02, 2016, 16:52 »
0
The only Macro site I know is Alamy. I took my 3 best sellers off micro and listed them on alamy (exclusive) and not one download yet.

I hope you have them RF on Alamy and not RM - once you've sold them on the micros you can't sell them as RM on Alamy or anywhere else, because you have no idea how they are being used.  If someone thinks they are getting exclusive use and then they find it all over the place they could sue you.

If they are RF on Alamy then you also can sell them on the micros so there is no need to be exclusive.  It is safer to leave your best sellers on the micros and just put new images exclusive on Alamy.  However, I think you will be disappointed at sales volume on Alamy.

I wrote them and asked them about this though:
"Hello, My name is Angela and I am a contributor. I want to sell some RM exclusive photos but they were once sold as RF on Shutterstock and Dreamstime. Is it okay to delete them from those sites and then list them as RM? Do I have to wait 30 days or anything?

They replied:

"Hi Angela
That wouldnt be a problem neither there will be a waiting period, you can just delete them immediately from the other sites and upload at Alamy straight away.
Hope this helps.

Cheers
Jaideep
Member Services

So I'm confused now ... I thought if I removed them it was okay ...

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #59 on: August 02, 2016, 16:58 »
+1

I wrote them and asked them about this though:
"Hello, My name is Angela and I am a contributor. I want to sell some RM exclusive photos but they were once sold as RF on Shutterstock and Dreamstime. Is it okay to delete them from those sites and then list them as RM? Do I have to wait 30 days or anything?

They replied:

"Hi Angela
That wouldnt be a problem neither there will be a waiting period, you can just delete them immediately from the other sites and upload at Alamy straight away.
Hope this helps.

Cheers
Jaideep
Member Services

So I'm confused now ... I thought if I removed them it was okay ...
They have clearly told you that you can upload them to Alamy as soon as they are removed from all RF sites (be careful, that includes partner sites, and word on msg in the past is that some partner sites can take months and a lot of pursuing before files are removed). Nothing confusing.
I'm actually surprised that they can be sold as RM-exclusive, though. I thought the only advantage of RM-exclusive was that if someone wanted exclusive rights, they wouldn't have to contact you to ask about any previous sales, as they have the record of sales. But that's the word you got, so there you go.

« Reply #60 on: August 02, 2016, 17:54 »
+1
My July earnings are mostly flat with a smaller modest portfolio. One question I have genuinely been wondering about. Since so many contributors are seeing such a drastic reduction in sales and earnings why is the MSG SS contributor earnings graph line showing a fairly significant spike in earnings for July.

Could it be more newbies reporting sales since SS has dropped their entrance requirements? Or is it that some contributors are doing much better while some are doing worse due to changing search algorithms? Or some other entirely different reason?

all of the above LOL

+ / or voting under the influence/encouragement of pot

« Reply #61 on: August 04, 2016, 08:01 »
0
in terms of DLs amount was not too bad ....but in incomes is -50%...but i've to say that i haven't upload good and interesting pictures for a while now...the ones that i expected to sell are selling normally

« Reply #62 on: August 04, 2016, 08:42 »
+8
I am more convinced than ever that income is controlled in some way. About half way through July, I was $100 shy of my monthly average.  I was thinking I would have a monster BME, but after the 15th, the sales died.  I started getting $7 days, $12 days $9 days for the entire rest of the month....and no more $40-$60 days. The month ended right at my average.

marthamarks

« Reply #63 on: August 04, 2016, 09:17 »
0
I've hardly uploaded anything during the past 1.5 years so that might have something to do with it.

I don't think that matters, because (based on my experience) new stuff doesn't sell. Images uploaded two years ago and earlier still do. New ones apparently die the moment they're uploaded.

gyllens

« Reply #64 on: August 04, 2016, 09:22 »
+3
I am more convinced than ever that income is controlled in some way. About half way through July, I was $100 shy of my monthly average.  I was thinking I would have a monster BME, but after the 15th, the sales died.  I started getting $7 days, $12 days $9 days for the entire rest of the month....and no more $40-$60 days. The month ended right at my average.

You don't even know how right you are. For the last eight days my daily take have differed just in cents and as you say after the 15th all credit sales dried and one is left with subscription sales only.
I have close to 22000 files at SS used to make payouts in half a day. I am removing some 3000 files in favour of a specialized agency that wont accept images being at SS.

This is unfortunately what its come to. My big question is where the money is going? or are they simply losing business.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2016, 10:34 by gyllens »

« Reply #65 on: August 04, 2016, 10:23 »
+1
July 2016 is 22% less then July 2015, and 40% less then July 2014  It very bed!!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

your best works come with spam in the titles, sorry couldn't resist..  those SS "spammy titles" emails are so fresh in my memory :)
Those was my research in last ten days to try to increase sales. And those are not my best works.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

May be it works. When a word appears multiple times in a title, it may boost the image search ranking under that particular word. That's why SS don't want contributors to spam titles. Aren't you afraid to publicly accept that you spam titles intentionally? SS might be watching. Anyway, best of luck with your research  :P

« Reply #66 on: August 04, 2016, 15:39 »
+1
gyllens, you are only allowed to remove like 100 per 90 days, so you will be deleting those 3000 images over a span of 7.5 years,

http://www.shutterstock.com/contributorsupport/articles/kbat02/Submitter-Terms-of-Service-version-8


gyllens

« Reply #67 on: August 04, 2016, 16:02 »
0
gyllens, you are only allowed to remove like 100 per 90 days, so you will be deleting those 3000 images over a span of 7.5 years,

http://www.shutterstock.com/contributorsupport/articles/kbat02/Submitter-Terms-of-Service-version-8


  Right I didnt think of that. They must have changed it somehow I'm sure at one stage you could deactivate files but no more. Oh well then I have little option but to remove 200 of the best sellers over a span of six months then because at the moment any uploading or waiting for a change of the algorithm is futile.

Thanks for the info.

« Reply #68 on: August 04, 2016, 16:57 »
+2
i have read it again, and i think they actually say you can remove 100 images in any 90 day period, so you can remove 33 images per month, still takes you 7.5 years. maybe write them an email asking if you can speed it up. feels like they're holding you for ransom

« Reply #69 on: August 04, 2016, 17:03 »
0
i have read it again, and i think they actually say you can remove 100 images in any 90 day period, so you can remove 33 images per month, still takes you 7.5 years. maybe write them an email asking if you can speed it up. feels like they're holding you for ransom

Actually if you read it, it states:
e. You may remove Content from your account at any time, provided that in any ninety (90) day period, you remove no more than (i) 100 items of Content; and (ii) 10% of your Content, whichever is greater.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #70 on: August 04, 2016, 17:22 »
+2
i have read it again, and i think they actually say you can remove 100 images in any 90 day period, so you can remove 33 images per month, still takes you 7.5 years. maybe write them an email asking if you can speed it up. feels like they're holding you for ransom

Actually if you read it, it states:
e. You may remove Content from your account at any time, provided that in any ninety (90) day period, you remove no more than (i) 100 items of Content; and (ii) 10% of your Content, whichever is greater.
Odd wording. Usually the conjunction would be 'or' not 'and'. I wonder what they meant? You can't really have 'and' in there and make sense.

« Reply #71 on: August 04, 2016, 17:34 »
0
good point, i was struggling with that as well, haha

« Reply #72 on: August 04, 2016, 17:35 »
+3


I saw that and found it odd phrasing as well.
But if its 10% then the person with 22000 images would be able to remove 2200 in 90 days followed by another 1900 the next 90 days. A lot less time than the 7.5 years calculated by someone else.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2016, 17:40 by PhotoBomb »

« Reply #73 on: August 10, 2016, 22:18 »
0
gyllens, you are only allowed to remove like 100 per 90 days, so you will be deleting those 3000 images over a span of 7.5 years,

http://www.shutterstock.com/contributorsupport/articles/kbat02/Submitter-Terms-of-Service-version-8


  Right I didnt think of that. They must have changed it somehow I'm sure at one stage you could deactivate files but no more. Oh well then I have little option but to remove 200 of the best sellers over a span of six months then because at the moment any uploading or waiting for a change of the algorithm is futile.

Thanks for the info.


The TOS says you can remove 10% of your content or 100 images in 90 days, whichever is greater, so you should be able to remove 2200 right away, and then wait 90 days to delete the other 800. 

EDIT: I posted this before I saw similar posts - agree the "and" in there is confusing, but IMHO you can delete 2200 right away, and then you'd have to wait 90 days to delete the other 800.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2016, 22:23 by wordplanet »

« Reply #74 on: August 11, 2016, 21:03 »
+1
There are a lot of misunderstandings about how Alamy operates and most of them come from contributors who read the faqs, misinterpret them, then go on repeating the misunderstanding.

Best is to write to support, they are always available for help, explain the issue in detail, then print the response e-mail and keep the records in a safe place. If problems arise latter.

AS for selling on Alamy, it takes so long to sell anything there, and most things just don'tt sell, that I am not surprised Alamy is not worried about the overlap. 


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
21 Replies
6158 Views
Last post August 12, 2009, 12:04
by laflor
35 Replies
12584 Views
Last post August 02, 2011, 13:29
by Megastock
44 Replies
13550 Views
Last post August 21, 2012, 09:56
by archibald1221
44 Replies
14626 Views
Last post August 27, 2013, 08:34
by tickstock
10 Replies
5338 Views
Last post August 07, 2014, 07:15
by Mellimage

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors