MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Shutterstock makes too much mistake.  (Read 4906 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 04, 2014, 23:28 »
0
Shutterstock makes too much mistake. Every batch there's something like this. :-X

It's a macro image of LCD screen.


Beppe Grillo

« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2014, 01:37 »
+1
Resubmit and write a comment to the inspector ("It's a macro photo of LCD screen" for example)

Ron

« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2014, 03:42 »
+1
I had 3 editorial images rejected this morning and to tag them as editorial when they were tagged as editorial. It makes no sense.

grey1

    This user is banned.
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2014, 03:46 »
-3
Shutterstock makes too much mistake. Every batch there's something like this. :-X

It's a macro image of LCD screen.

When shooting screens or Tv monitors you very often get banding, fringing, purples etc. Could be that? use an f-stop of 16 or smaller.

« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2014, 07:54 »
0
Or switch to a different channel.

« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2014, 07:58 »
+3
I had 3 editorial images rejected this morning and to tag them as editorial when they were tagged as editorial. It makes no sense.

Hello Ron,

The issue that you experienced is because it appears the images were tagged as editorial after submission, rather than before.  Currently, that can result in a rejection.  Our team already has a plan to improve and fix that scenario, but in the meantime, tagging your images with the editorial designation prior to submission should alleviate the issue.

We apologize for the inconvenience!  This is on our radar to fix.

Best,

Scott
VP of Content 


Ron

« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2014, 08:07 »
0
I had 3 editorial images rejected this morning and to tag them as editorial when they were tagged as editorial. It makes no sense.

Hello Ron,

The issue that you experienced is because it appears the images were tagged as editorial after submission, rather than before.  Currently, that can result in a rejection.  Our team already has a plan to improve and fix that scenario, but in the meantime, tagging your images with the editorial designation prior to submission should alleviate the issue.

We apologize for the inconvenience!  This is on our radar to fix.

Best,

Scott
VP of Content

Hi Scott, all images were tagged editorial before submitting, but thanks for responding and fixing the bug

thanks.


« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2014, 09:48 »
0
Resubmit and write a comment to the inspector ("It's a macro photo of LCD screen" for example)

It usually gets through the second time but I have to do this every now and then. It becomes too time consuming.

Ron

« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2014, 10:26 »
0
The other 33 were rejected for the same reason that I had to tag them as editorial. And they were all tagged before submitting. I am 100% sure of that because it happened before where I forgot to do it. This time I made sure I tagged them editorial. To no avail.

« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2014, 11:03 »
+2
The other 33 were rejected for the same reason that I had to tag them as editorial. And they were all tagged before submitting. I am 100% sure of that because it happened before where I forgot to do it. This time I made sure I tagged them editorial. To no avail.

OK, if that's the case, then Anthony will reach out to you from our team to investigate if this is a separate system bug with the goal of gathering more information to diagnose it.   

Best,

Scott


Ron

« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2014, 11:10 »
0
The other 33 were rejected for the same reason that I had to tag them as editorial. And they were all tagged before submitting. I am 100% sure of that because it happened before where I forgot to do it. This time I made sure I tagged them editorial. To no avail.

OK, if that's the case, then Anthony will reach out to you from our team to investigate if this is a separate system bug with the goal of gathering more information to diagnose it.   

Best,

Scott

Thanks Scott, I received the email from Anthony, I will work with him to help you resolve this bug. My pleasure.

thanks a lot
Ron

« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2014, 03:09 »
0
Just had this happen to me too, definitely marked two images as editorial and had them rejected due to 'In order for this to be reviewed correctly, resubmit & tag as editorial'

As a side also had a photo rejected due 'in order for this to be reviewed correctly, resubmit & tag as illustration - '...

maybe a bug in the editorial submission, it was a mixed batch?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
What a MISTAKE !!!!

Started by lagereek « 1 2  All » iStockPhoto.com

27 Replies
8441 Views
Last post April 14, 2011, 02:06
by lagereek
18 Replies
6033 Views
Last post May 20, 2012, 11:38
by sarah2
1 Replies
2622 Views
Last post August 01, 2012, 15:35
by click_click
11 Replies
5476 Views
Last post July 14, 2013, 13:42
by cthoman
42 Replies
12273 Views
Last post January 14, 2021, 08:42
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle