MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Shuttersubs?  (Read 1567 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: December 28, 2018, 10:59 »
0
this month 4% of sale are not sub, 96% of sub..ne 2,85 sale in the last 10 days...they are promoting packages of sub? never happened to me...a pd appalling...download are normal, but with such an rpd is impossible to earn something.....fotolia instead rpd of 1,78 dollar this month, just to compare. seems to me that those free photos website are impacting the mcrostock industry heavily.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2018, 11:01 by jonbull »


« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2018, 11:55 »
+2
Just to compare your comparison: my SS rpd for December 2018 is $1.23, while my FT rpd for December 2018 is $1.
The split for my December 2018 photo revenue from SS is as follows:

Subs: 29%
ODDs: 29%
ELs: 19%
SODs: 23%

It doesn't really look like a "shuttersub", as you can see.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2018, 12:08 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2018, 12:19 »
0
Just to compare your comparison: my SS rpd for December 2018 is $1.23, while my FT rpd for December 2018 is $1.
The split for my December 2018 photo revenue from SS is as follows:

Subs: 29%
ODDs: 29%
ELs: 19%
SODs: 23%

It doesn't really look like a "shuttersub", as you can see.

not talking about revenue but number of download.

« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2018, 14:03 »
+1
Just to compare your comparison: my SS rpd for December 2018 is $1.23, while my FT rpd for December 2018 is $1.
The split for my December 2018 photo revenue from SS is as follows:

Subs: 29%
ODDs: 29%
ELs: 19%
SODs: 23%

It doesn't really look like a "shuttersub", as you can see.

not talking about revenue but number of download.

Why? The number of DLs doesn't pay bills, but dollars do, right?
Anyway, I just checked again: 16% of my downloads are non-subs.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2018, 18:27 by Zero Talent »


 

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results