MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: SOD/OD/ED seem to have stopped in May  (Read 14218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: May 09, 2014, 13:43 »
+4
I had a great April, but this month (May) SOD, OD, and EDs are almost non-existent. I'm wondering if anyone else is seeing this? 


« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2014, 14:09 »
+1
Same here, 7% of my April downloads were OD, but now it's 0% despite more sales in May.

DPC effect?

« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2014, 14:15 »
0
April was my best month so far but my SOD, ED, have been non Existent and ODs cut in half in May. Could it be that Dollarphotoclub is having an impact?

« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2014, 14:16 »
+2
I have had some OD sales, but no SOD or ED so far in May which had seemed a little unusual.

However, it's not even half way through the month yet and it may just be that all the high spenders are on some yacht trip somewhere :)

ethan

« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2014, 14:31 »
+7
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2014, 14:42 »
0
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 21:21 by tickstock »

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2014, 14:48 »
0
I'm getting all three types of downloads on a fairly regular basis, though the really large sales have dried up over the past few weeks. My income there continues on an overall upward trend, while iS is on a downward trend. Some months I have more sales, but I can trace that to sales of files that are tied to holidays or events.

« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2014, 14:55 »
+2
They said their enterprise sales have doubled since last year while the collection has gone up 40%.   Most people should be seeing an increase in those sales.

Yes, I definitely see that. After a blast of a BME in April due to record SODs it has been business as usual in May so far, not exceptionally but not bad either. Is that an I-opted-out-of-DPC effect?  ;D

« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2014, 14:56 »
+5
I had a great April, but this month (May) SOD, OD, and EDs are almost non-existent. I'm wondering if anyone else is seeing this?

Not for me. SOD, OD and ELs as usual.

« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2014, 15:22 »
+2
I only have smaller portfolios so the variations in my sales are not of much interest, but the only ODs I have got this month so far are actually two from Fotolia. Have opted out of DPC and removed my best sellers at Fotolia, so I thought I would not get much more from them...have less than 200 images there now. 

Ron

« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2014, 15:52 »
+6
Sales go up sales go down, but more erratic then ever yet I keep hitting BME.

One day I have many ODDs the next I have one, but at the end of the month I know if it was good or bad.

Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.

« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2014, 16:06 »
0
well, I would be happy to get 5% of my port to sell every day. I did notice the day I got a large SOD early in the day I didn't get another DL all day - which is odd. 
I guess one solution would be to stop uploading there and open another acct (as a business). It would be painful 'til you hit the top tier there, but otherwise you could double your income if they throttle the second acct. at the same level. Or just stop uploading to SS and consider that your residual income and devote your time and effort to stocksy or offset or something like that.
For me OD sales are about normal so far this month, SOD are a little low. Sales in general are a little low.


« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2014, 16:13 »
+1
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

This is really interesting and I for one do not regard it as a conspiracy theory.   It sounds exactly like something they'd do in an attempt to keep contributors hanging on.   Unfortunately it also seems rather transparent and obvious.

My own portfolio is probably too small to be a statistical valid sample.

« Reply #13 on: May 09, 2014, 16:38 »
0
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

This is really interesting and I for one do not regard it as a conspiracy theory.   It sounds exactly like something they'd do in an attempt to keep contributors hanging on.   Unfortunately it also seems rather transparent and obvious.

My own portfolio is probably too small to be a statistical valid sample.

It would not be that hard to cap DL for a port, but if they were clever they would put some sort of random limit on the cap so it wasn't obvious - I guess the other thing would be to note what time of day your last DL was every day - and how do they stop sales - push your images down in search or just not report them? If your images drop off the searches once you hit your quota that should be very obvious.

If your DL are capped at x% of port per day, then you need to upload a heap of quick and easy to produce images so that your port size goes up to allow the good sellers to sell all day.

« Reply #14 on: May 09, 2014, 17:02 »
+2
I had a great April, but this month (May) SOD, OD, and EDs are almost non-existent. I'm wondering if anyone else is seeing this?

Big time for me. Maybe another search adjustment, but horrible, horrible sales.  I wasn't going to start a thread about it but since you did I thought i'd vent a bit.

ethan

« Reply #15 on: May 09, 2014, 17:14 »
+2
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

This is really interesting and I for one do not regard it as a conspiracy theory.   It sounds exactly like something they'd do in an attempt to keep contributors hanging on.   Unfortunately it also seems rather transparent and obvious.

My own portfolio is probably too small to be a statistical valid sample.

It would not be that hard to cap DL for a port, but if they were clever they would put some sort of random limit on the cap so it wasn't obvious - I guess the other thing would be to note what time of day your last DL was every day - and how do they stop sales - push your images down in search or just not report them? If your images drop off the searches once you hit your quota that should be very obvious.

If your DL are capped at x% of port per day, then you need to upload a heap of quick and easy to produce images so that your port size goes up to allow the good sellers to sell all day.
Pancaketom. My last download was three hours ago. That was when I reached my 4.8% of portfolio total. I'm not kidding. I use the SS mobile App  to track my D/L's on my iTouch, I just checked, it's exactly the same image since three hours ago.

Want to place a bet it's still the last download image in about five hours from now?
It will be.

Every day is the same. And I am no messing with you man. It's a fact. And tomorrow I know I will be posting my last image (three hours ago) will be the last image I sell today.

It will be.

Every day is the same. I feel that guy in Groundhog day. Seriously.

Have to say though, I love the song :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BERd61bDY7k

Goofy

« Reply #16 on: May 09, 2014, 17:17 »
+1
"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Now everyone say this three times in a row-

"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Best advice I've seen or heard in a while...

 8)






ethan

« Reply #17 on: May 09, 2014, 17:20 »
+3
"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Now everyone say this three times in a row-

"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Best advice I've seen or heard in a while...

 8)
What about three months? That's what I said.
aka. Ground hog Day :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BERd61bDY7k


« Reply #18 on: May 09, 2014, 17:25 »
+4
"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Now everyone say this three times in a row-

"Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month.
Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "


Best advice I've seen or heard in a while...

 8)

Well I am looking at 9-days, or almost 1/3 of the month, not a single day. Sales definitely out of the ordinary for me. If you have been doing this long enough and have a big enough port, you have a "feel" for when something is different. No conspiracy theory.  Just abnormal. As I said, possible a shift in search for some of us.  Remember, Scott has said before that they test different search algorithms on a sample of the population.  Could be that some of us are part of that test....assuming, of course, it's happening.

« Reply #19 on: May 09, 2014, 17:28 »
+3
Same old same old. Someone takes the time to watch his port closely for 3 full months and then reports detailed information regarding his sales pattern and then receives the usual parroted spew "Stop judging your sales on daily bases, it will drive you mad. Look at it from month to month. "

Too bad more contributors do not take the time to actually track what is occurring in their ports!

Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

ethan

« Reply #20 on: May 09, 2014, 17:38 »
+2
^ Thanks Gbalex.

Thanks man :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Fa4lOQfbA

It's Friday night. Enjoy the weekend.

I know I'm right :)

« Reply #21 on: May 09, 2014, 17:43 »
0
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

This is really interesting and I for one do not regard it as a conspiracy theory.   It sounds exactly like something they'd do in an attempt to keep contributors hanging on.   Unfortunately it also seems rather transparent and obvious.

My own portfolio is probably too small to be a statistical valid sample.

It would not be that hard to cap DL for a port, but if they were clever they would put some sort of random limit on the cap so it wasn't obvious - I guess the other thing would be to note what time of day your last DL was every day - and how do they stop sales - push your images down in search or just not report them? If your images drop off the searches once you hit your quota that should be very obvious.

If your DL are capped at x% of port per day, then you need to upload a heap of quick and easy to produce images so that your port size goes up to allow the good sellers to sell all day.
Pancaketom. My last download was three hours ago. That was when I reached my 4.8% of portfolio total. I'm not kidding. I use the SS mobile App  to track my D/L's on my iTouch, I just checked, it's exactly the same image since three hours ago.

Want to place a bet it's still the last download image in about five hours from now?
It will be.

Every day is the same. And I am no messing with you man. It's a fact. And tomorrow I know I will be posting my last image (three hours ago) will be the last image I sell today.

It will be.

Every day is the same. I feel that guy in Groundhog day. Seriously.

Have to say though, I love the song :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BERd61bDY7k

Interesting - do your images move in the search position once you get your last dl?

Now it would be handy to be able to buy one of your own images to see if/when it is reported.

ethan

« Reply #22 on: May 09, 2014, 17:59 »
+5
Cannot say I have but I have noticed a drop in SOD's or ODD's but what I have noticed (over the last three months) is that my earnings/downloads are "definitely capped" every single day.

At first I thought it was a co-incidence, so I ignored commenting on it but just continued to monitor it.

After watching it closely and saying nothing (over the last 12 weeks) I am convinced that SS are regulating my income.

I have precisely (and I mean precisely) between 4.5% - 5% of my total portfolio number downloaded every single week day (Mon-Fri).

Without any exceptions. On weekends it drops to 2% - 3% per day. Consistently.

Furthermore, even with the combination of Subs/ODD/SODs, each day my earnings (for each day) are within a tolerance of 5% of all days in that week.

I remember reading over on the SS forum (about a year ago) from a very long standing and experienced contributor "that when SS start rationing incomes that's the beginning of the end for me, I'll close my account"

Genuinely, I think that is what their doing, certainly to me and my portfolio. And I stress again, this has been consistent for the last three months. And I continue to monitor it, and every week the numbers confirm it.

This week for example, the same downloads within a margin of 3 downloads every single day and I'm talking between 35 - 50 downloads everyday. No way is that a co-incidence over a three month period. No way. And that even includes Bank holidays, the tolernaces are too close to say they're accidental, they're programmed !

You cannot rationally explain the pure consistency of downloads/income per day over such a period. For me it's basically a flat line, it might be a high line, but it's still a virtually flat line.

You have gotta hand it to the software guys at SS - they're doing a great job in rationing my standard of living, ergo - my success.

And finally, and even more kudos to those software guys, they allow me just a 1- 2% growth each month, just enough to get my BME and the the occasional BDE, hence the virtually "flat line". Clever. Very Clever

I sometimes wonder is that just to keep me quiet?

Well enough, I don't think so :)

#bustedSS

SS lovers vote me down, SS haters vote me up. I actually don't care. I'm stating the facts in my own case, if I could show you my numbers I know you would believe me.
This is a fix.

This is really interesting and I for one do not regard it as a conspiracy theory.   It sounds exactly like something they'd do in an attempt to keep contributors hanging on.   Unfortunately it also seems rather transparent and obvious.

My own portfolio is probably too small to be a statistical valid sample.

It would not be that hard to cap DL for a port, but if they were clever they would put some sort of random limit on the cap so it wasn't obvious - I guess the other thing would be to note what time of day your last DL was every day - and how do they stop sales - push your images down in search or just not report them? If your images drop off the searches once you hit your quota that should be very obvious.

If your DL are capped at x% of port per day, then you need to upload a heap of quick and easy to produce images so that your port size goes up to allow the good sellers to sell all day.
Pancaketom. My last download was three hours ago. That was when I reached my 4.8% of portfolio total. I'm not kidding. I use the SS mobile App  to track my D/L's on my iTouch, I just checked, it's exactly the same image since three hours ago.

Want to place a bet it's still the last download image in about five hours from now?
It will be.

Every day is the same. And I am no messing with you man. It's a fact. And tomorrow I know I will be posting my last image (three hours ago) will be the last image I sell today.

It will be.

Every day is the same. I feel that guy in Groundhog day. Seriously.

Have to say though, I love the song :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BERd61bDY7k

Interesting - do your images move in the search position once you get your last dl?

Now it would be handy to be able to buy one of your own images to see if/when it is reported.

I tested it today, A business associate in London checked my portfolio whilst i was on the phone to him. I told him exactly what to look for in the search and he described (on the phone) what he could see in regard to my portfolio, and more specifically a search topic. His view matched my mine perfectly. Position 1 on page one of 47,000 images.  Two minutes later I called another friend in the US, Virginia WA, and talked her through what to do, the same thing btw.

With the exact same information she did not see any of my images at all on page one of the exact same page.

Now, with that specific image description, I have pole position 1, 7, 15 and 20 with different images of the exact same thing all on page one, again, of 47,000, she stated (live) on the phone "******* I cannot see any of your images, honestly, none"

OK some where the same, as she described them to me, mine however where not even showing at all on the page

Go figure :(

Same website, same search criteria, totally different results.

Tomorrow I'm doing the exact same exercise at the same time with a pal in Christchurch (NZ), my friend in VA and again my pal in London.

I'll post the results although I suspect the same thing :(


« Reply #23 on: May 09, 2014, 18:16 »
+2
Unfortunately you are not alone Ethan.  I have noticed the same pattern.  It is set in stone and never changes after a year of careful daily inspection.

I completely agree that it is real, I know what has been occurring in my port and patterns as consistent as this do not emerge without intervention on shutterstocks end.

fritz

  • I love Tom and Jerry music

« Reply #24 on: May 09, 2014, 18:26 »
+2
In May so far ODD-23   SOD-26. Looks normal to me for port size (6640 files)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
4379 Views
Last post February 22, 2009, 19:15
by MikLav
6 Replies
4515 Views
Last post June 01, 2014, 02:09
by Ariene
17 Replies
5142 Views
Last post April 27, 2016, 03:30
by Sebastian Radu
88 Replies
31098 Views
Last post October 04, 2016, 02:39
by Microstockphoto
35 Replies
12274 Views
Last post December 18, 2018, 16:44
by sturmwarnung

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors