pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Someone tricked the Shutterstock algorithm?  (Read 7459 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #75 on: May 13, 2021, 15:47 »
+1
Not just algorithm gaming to wonder about here.
Anyone that has or had access to the database or backend itself (so a worker, former worker, hacker) could easily up-rank.

Its obviously a fake name and account, could be anyone anywhere in the world.


« Reply #76 on: May 14, 2021, 01:19 »
+1
I submit photos to Shutterstock pretty much daily and I don't see my photos ranking No. 1 with every keyword I use, so that certainly can't be what's happening here.

This.

Many contributors are uploading on a daily basis, and many of them more than 10 per day which would get you roughly the amount of images that our friend Oleg has online. They don't have their images at the top of the first page for single and highly competitive keywords.

While I haven't seen any proof of this, I can believe that maintaining an active portfolio is one (minor) of the many factors that can determine the ranking of content and sales. But it will not get it to the front page. I would say that requires very high click-through and conversion rates.

So it's clearly manipulated. Probably by blackhat techniques. Click/buy farms, or an exploit on the algorithm. We will probably never know, as those who know how to do it don't tell. At least, not here. There might be a thread on one of the Russian .onion hacking related forums or so, but hell, I'm too lazy to even start digging for that. I do know such forums have threads on how to download content without watermark, or links to complete dumps of unwatermarked and full-sized content.

Inside job is also possible, but it sounds more complicated and traceable to me. More risky for those involved. It's possible, but whoever did that looses the job and risks legal issues.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2021, 01:22 by Roscoe »

« Reply #77 on: May 14, 2021, 03:21 »
0
Brought up on the Shutterstock forum, but some of you might have missed it.


Can anyone link the thread on the SS forum? I can't seem to find it.

« Reply #78 on: May 14, 2021, 03:46 »
0
Brought up on the Shutterstock forum, but some of you might have missed it.


Can anyone link the thread on the SS forum? I can't seem to find it.

There isn't really any other info available there. People are as much in the dark about what's going on there than they are here.
https://forums.submit.shutterstock.com/topic/101933-one-account-phenomenon/
« Last Edit: May 14, 2021, 04:53 by Firn »

« Reply #79 on: May 14, 2021, 04:02 »
+1
Thanks Firn - what a strange situation. Hopefully SS pull their finger out and stop him gaming, r someone else works out how he does it. I could do with a boost on my pics and vids :)

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #80 on: May 14, 2021, 09:44 »
+1
What I dont get is this (and I have obsessed far too much about it and will definitely stop after this post!): if he's doing this intentionally doesnt matter how why doesnt he shoot more profitable subjects?

If I had a magic button that rockets every picture I take to number one in the search, I would quickly rig together a semi-professional setup use a set, hire some models, maybe even throw some money at a professional photographer to coach me on lighting and posing etc, so that my shots look the best they can.


Yes to both, good thinking on the quality question. And all the guessing and for some people saying "this is obvious", we have no answers? So it's not obvious and there's nothing to say it's an error, upload volume, location, he's doing it, or it's someone inside or any of the other guesses. We don't know.

When someone provides some proof and evidence, then I'll get interested. I can't do anything about this, so yes... "I have obsessed far too much about it and will definitely stop after this post" no more guesses from me. My guess is link farms, free sites, driving views. And NO  I have nothing to say that I have any better answer than he has hacked the sales site or it's a SS test account.

Anyone can make up anything and none of us can prove it wrong. The responsibility is for someone making a claim to prove it's valid.

Giant Invisible Frogs from outer space are hacking the system. No one can prove that my answer is not the real answer?

« Reply #81 on: May 26, 2021, 04:58 »
+1
my size theory is not it, i tested it

could it be that he uploads an image and then have bots click on the image and maybe download a few from a buyer account to propel them to teh first spot??,

« Reply #82 on: May 26, 2021, 08:26 »
0
my size theory is not it, i tested it

could it be that he uploads an image and then have bots click on the image and maybe download a few from a buyer account to propel them to teh first spot??,
Yes this is my guess too. They have probably found it only takes a few early sales and/or clicks to get an image to the top and that across a portfolio it adds up financially.

« Reply #83 on: June 10, 2021, 03:33 »
+1
Just had to revive this thread after I found this guess who owns the top placement of 38 Million "isolated" images... with an image that is everything but isolated.
That's the worst kind of advertising shitterstock could wish for and they don't even care. :o


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
2533 Views
Last post March 15, 2016, 19:20
by michaeldb
45 Replies
15353 Views
Last post May 05, 2016, 12:08
by Minsc
71 Replies
17817 Views
Last post February 04, 2018, 10:45
by YadaYadaYada
34 Replies
10125 Views
Last post November 07, 2018, 18:41
by farbled
20 Replies
4833 Views
Last post September 29, 2018, 15:59
by nobody

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle