MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: * with SS and Model / Property Release - Invalid Model Release  (Read 1487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 08, 2019, 00:31 »
0
All photo Rejected with

Invalid Model Release: One or more of the attached model releases does not meet our requirements.

Before never was problem with release and now 2 times Rejected.

Today video with animated icons Rejected with Invalid Model Release: One or more of the attached model releases does not meet our requirements.
Till now i did just screenshots from Graphic and was okay....



« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2019, 06:03 »
0
it's hard to say without seeing your release.  Can you post a shot of your release without any of the personal details filled in.

« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2019, 08:02 »
0
New Release made, Release from SS, everithing okay with release and now again rejected:

MODEL RELEASE MISSING? that release there. what? visible trademark? all of logo text deleted. speech bubble made myself. have lot of photos with so concept, never was problem, never. AS accepted, IS accepted, SS? make some sh@t.

« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2019, 08:06 »
0
Release for male model

« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2019, 08:12 »
0
I think you need to attach a photo of the model as visual reference so they can cross-check with the photo.

« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2019, 08:13 »
0
Also, is the witness a different person than the model and the photographer?

« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2019, 08:14 »
0
witness yeah my mother :D she was always.

« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2019, 08:16 »
0
I think you need to attach a photo of the model as visual reference so they can cross-check with the photo.

not really, that is for nude shooting etc. and i never used ref photos for normal shooting and never was problem

« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2019, 08:21 »
0
Hmm not sure, only the date signed by photographer and model/witness is different by a month, but that shouldn't matter either as long as the date for witness and model is the same. You can always try to resubmit, it could be a drunk reviewer  ::)

« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2019, 08:36 »
+1
Hmm not sure, only the date signed by photographer and model/witness is different by a month, but that shouldn't matter either as long as the date for witness and model is the same. You can always try to resubmit, it could be a drunk reviewer  ::)

SS wants them all the same.  You can try and explain the witness is witnessing the model, but they dont care.

« Reply #10 on: April 08, 2019, 08:39 »
0


Hmm not sure, only the date signed by photographer and model/witness is different by a month, but that shouldn't matter either as long as the date for witness and model is the same. You can always try to resubmit, it could be a drunk reviewer  ::)

3 times? no way, and not just me have so problem. i not understand. before never never was problem. I opened this topic maybe somebody know whats wrong with SS. but anyway they are going to perfect way to making the contributor crazy. First thing was 1,50 video sale, nobody want this, now vector have to 4 megapixel. lot of designer is angry and started petition. Model Release problems by other contributor as well. sooooo.....

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2019, 13:53 »
0
Hmm not sure, only the date signed by photographer and model/witness is different by a month, but that shouldn't matter either as long as the date for witness and model is the same. You can always try to resubmit, it could be a drunk reviewer  ::)

SS wants them all the same.  You can try and explain the witness is witnessing the model, but they dont care.

When others started having problems, I made sure all three dates match. I know what you are saying, it's a witness for the model but SS apparently doesn't tell reviewers that. Anyway, all my releases now have all three dates identical.

I also include the printed name for each, not just a signature, just to be ahead of the requirements or mysterious rejections that don't tell us WHY?

Heck some of the old releases used to have one date for the whole release and a bunch of signatures and they got accepted. Adding a date or correcting information is not fraud. Faking a witness would be, but making the dates match would just be adjusting for new standards and requirements.

Old releases that were acceptable five years ago, should still be accepted for the same shoot and model. You don't make something illegal after the fact and back date rulings. That's what SS has done. I know it's their game and their rules, but in legal terms, ex post facto changes can't apply to events in the past.

Arguing with the agencies is useless, so is complaining, because they make the rules and change them and we have no say or opening to appeal or reason with them. Talk about arbitrary!


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
3695 Views
Last post April 21, 2006, 13:10
by leaf
17 Replies
8210 Views
Last post August 17, 2010, 10:48
by Anyka
9 Replies
5255 Views
Last post April 21, 2011, 14:56
by Renata L
3 Replies
2136 Views
Last post June 29, 2013, 12:43
by Ron
7 Replies
2216 Views
Last post September 16, 2013, 08:30
by gillian vann

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results