MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => Shutterstock.com => Topic started by: Sean Locke Photography on August 20, 2009, 10:24

Title: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Sean Locke Photography on August 20, 2009, 10:24
... and I'm not speaking of her top.  Weird they allow this way of ripping off the buyer.  Guess it doesn't really matter on a sub site?

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-35368807/stock-photo-young-sexy-santa-in-bikini-isolated-on-white.html (http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-35368807/stock-photo-young-sexy-santa-in-bikini-isolated-on-white.html)
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: disorderly on August 20, 2009, 10:28
More to the point, does it matter on a site that doesn't charge you by resolution?
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: abimages on August 20, 2009, 10:31
Sean you been doing the 'sexy' keyword search again? ;)
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Sean Locke Photography on August 20, 2009, 10:38
Quote from: disorderly on August 20, 2009, 10:28
More to the point, does it matter on a site that doesn't charge you by resolution?

Yeah, that was my question - does it really matter on a sub site?  Probably not.  It just looked odd in the results.
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Sean Locke Photography on August 20, 2009, 10:39
Quote from: abimages on August 20, 2009, 10:31
Sean you been doing the 'sexy' keyword search again? ;)

"Christmas" !   :D
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: lisafx on August 20, 2009, 12:22
Wow!  Surprised that would have been accepted anywhere.  It's not the white space but the long, drawn out explanation taking up half the frame that seems weird.
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Elenathewise on August 20, 2009, 13:26
Weird indeed.
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Graffoto on August 20, 2009, 14:27
Maybe the artist put that in so the inspector would not reject the shot for 'composition'?


ETA: Um, after seeing the below, maybe not.
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: Pixart on August 20, 2009, 15:32
First, Maksim, if you are a member of this forum - sorry for singling you out.  But I clicked the link in Sean's post and took a wander through your first half dozen pages.  Dude, you sure know how to get the mileage out of  a single shot!

(You can single me out too, but warning - you are a much better shooter than I and it wouldn't be very good sport).

I'm sure there must be another version of that third one but I didn't look hard enough.

(http://thumb1.shutterstock.com.edgesuite.net/display_pic_with_logo/84070/84070,1250149298,1/stock-photo-sexy-lady-isolated-on-white-35181007.jpg)
(http://thumb15.shutterstock.com.edgesuite.net/display_pic_with_logo/84070/84070,1250707153,1/stock-photo-sexy-lady-isolated-on-white-35543182.jpg)
(http://thumb1.shutterstock.com.edgesuite.net/display_pic_with_logo/84070/84070,1250581441,4/stock-photo-sexy-lady-isolated-on-white-35446453.jpg)
(http://thumb9.shutterstock.com.edgesuite.net/display_pic_with_logo/84070/84070,1249654183,8/stock-photo-sexy-lady-isolated-on-white-34886251.jpg)
Title: Re: Talk About Padding...
Post by: lisafx on August 20, 2009, 15:42
Wow, that seems a bit over the top!

No wonder the searches are so clogged!!