0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My last 60 sales are ALL 25-A day.An entire week 😢Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a bit amazing to me that I get minus-ed for my previous post. Are there that many people here who actually think subscriptions are good for contributors?
Of course, SS's long term goal is to herd all their buyers onto subscriptions, where the money is in up-front fees that the photographer never sees, and so-called royalty payments are arbitrary token amounts. So we should see fewer and fewer ODs over time.I quit submitting at SS over a year ago. If they raise contributor payments significantly - and no, 2 cents is not significant - I might submit some more. If they cut payments by any amount, I'm deleting everything and walking away for good. You can probably guess which outcome I think is more likely.
It's a bit amazing to me that I get minus-ed for my previous post. Are there that many people here who actually think subscriptions are good for contributors? Or who still believe that SS's intention is for microstock to be profitable for photographers? The will to believe is strong.
For me it's just the 4.35 sods which have completely stopped - I used to get quite a few. Whatever they were......Other small sods as normal...
Or maybe the lack of SOD sales is due to a successful Premier Select Trial and many of the SODs are going to the selected high lifetime earners?
Quote from: stockastic on April 10, 2015, 14:25It's a bit amazing to me that I get minus-ed for my previous post. Are there that many people here who actually think subscriptions are good for contributors? Or who still believe that SS's intention is for microstock to be profitable for photographers? The will to believe is strong.You hit the nail on the head with that one.