Here's a cut and paste from my original post with a few ideas and a bit of clarification:
Most improved site
Best new tools for contributors on a stock site --- e.g. the new keyword suggestion tool on SS
Best Microstock app/tool (third party) --- e.g. microstock analytics or third party uploaders
Top curators (for keeping the collection clean, how well they handle reported infringements)
Best content (for good reviews)
Best search algorithm (for relevant search results)
Contributors' choice award (the big one "best picture" equivalent)
Oh sorry I got the wrong end of the stick!
I think "the stockies" is a good informal name, but the formal name needs to be something like the Annual Microstock Group Industry Awards IMHO. Especially if the agencies are going to take them seriously.
ETA or the Annual Microstock Group Contributor Awards?
I thought the voting could be open to anyone. Agencies could try to send people here to vote for them, but as it will be anonymous it could easily backfire for "bad" agencies.
Also because there are so many contributors any attempt to rig the vote by sending staff to vote should be a drop in the ocean, although in this case how to avoid someone setting up many accounts to rig the vote?
Oh my.... Wouldn't want to issue Istock a sweaty SAC award!
not a fan of the ribbons. aren't we creatives? shouldn't they look modern, not so old-fashioned and cliched (and clip arty)? few awards like this are ribboned nowadays.
I thought SAC was good but now that you've mentioned the slang equivalent (used in australia too, but not by me) is it out?
Seeing that they are our agents (although many do not act that why), but are not the agents of the buyers, we can perhaps indicate that the awards are based on our evaluation of who are good agents (representatives) by simply calling the awards:THE MICROSTOCK AGENCY OF THE YEAR AWARDS
(MSA AWARDS)
3 levels - Gold / Silver and Bronze (3 positions most recognizable internationally)
Points awarded on all the categories and tallied up to end up with only the top 3, else it gets to complicated and difficult to manage. It also increases the value to the Agencies if there are only 3.
How does that sound?
You think we can get the winners of the negative awards to perhaps place their "black list banners" on their front pages ;DSeeing that they are our agents (although many do not act that why), but are not the agents of the buyers, we can perhaps indicate that the awards are based on our evaluation of who are good agents (representatives) by simply calling the awards:THE MICROSTOCK AGENCY OF THE YEAR AWARDS
(MSA AWARDS)
3 levels - Gold / Silver and Bronze (3 positions most recognizable internationally)
Points awarded on all the categories and tallied up to end up with only the top 3, else it gets to complicated and difficult to manage. It also increases the value to the Agencies if there are only 3.
How does that sound?
good! I believe we need to have negative awards too like someone referred a few days ago