Agency Based Discussion > Snapixel.com
Snapixel.com
melastmohican:
No FTP.
leaf:
--- Quote from: thomasw on April 30, 2009, 00:14 ---Um well hate to be a pain in the a$$ but would the OP please reffer to the following thread?
http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-services/rules-for-starting-a-thread-in-this-area/
I don't really think that this current thread really applies to newbies. Best of luck to the OP though with your venture and welcome to the lions den!
--- End quote ---
thread moved to appropriate area.
leaf:
I agree with everything FlemishDreams said - I think he said it well and the owners of the site would do well to listen to the advice given. So here is another I agree.
also,
Perhaps they could have image upload free if you put them in the 'Marketplace'
If geotagging is part of the site, I don't see anywhere where it is searchable. Wouldn't this be a great search method for buyers?
The watermark is VERY faint and will probably get a lot of complaints from microstock photographers.
sharpshot:
Thanks to Flemish for saving me some time clicking on the link. I am not uploading to a site with large preview images and no watermark. I disagree about mostphotos though, that site works for me.
What will it take for a new site to succeed? They will have to forget us paying to upload for a start, that is ridiculous. There are enough free sites that make money for us. They will need a big advertising budget and lots of unique content. I think it is almost impossible for a site launching now to generate enough sales to make it worth using. Hopefully they will prove me wrong.
kgtoh:
I completely abhor "stock photo" sites that charge for hosting.
It's a clear conflict of interest and a certain indicator that they are not serious about selling your images. They just want to make money from naive photographers.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version