MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => Software => Topic started by: Chichikov on December 20, 2017, 03:45

Title: Lightroom and contenders - Interesting analysis of the various softwares
Post by: Chichikov on December 20, 2017, 03:45
An interesting comparison between the different existing software to develop the raw images
https://amazingsky.net/2017/12/06/testing-10-photoshop-contenders/
Title: Re: Lightroom and contenders - Interesting analysis of the various softwares
Post by: Brightontl on December 20, 2017, 07:45
This is very interesting and I perfectly agree with it.
Thanks for sharing
Title: Re: Lightroom and contenders - Interesting analysis of the various softwares
Post by: Chichikov on December 20, 2017, 09:15
Quote from: Brightontl on December 20, 2017, 07:45
This is very interesting and I perfectly agree with it.
Thanks for sharing
Yes, when I posted it I remembered that you told that you would like to do some comparative yourself.
Well, this saves you a lot of work :D
Title: Re: Lightroom and contenders - Interesting analysis of the various softwares
Post by: Brightontl on December 20, 2017, 10:48
Quote from: Chichikov on December 20, 2017, 09:15
Quote from: Brightontl on December 20, 2017, 07:45
This is very interesting and I perfectly agree with it.
Thanks for sharing
Yes, when I posted it I remembered that you told that you would like to do some comparative yourself.
Well, this saves you a lot of work :D
It is absolutely extremely useful.
I still have a project of analyzing the different alternatives to LR and PS, although I hesitate because frankly for my workflow of heavy time lapses, video 4k and photo, there really is not even the remote alternative.
Also I don't really understand the argument again the subscription, at least for a professional use: $10 per month is less that what I spend in memory cards, let alone models, travels, hotels, lenses and so on.
So maybe I will wait for a serious contender to show up