Agency Based Discussion > StockFresh

Is it dead?

(1/3) > >>

PokemonMaster:
Is it dead? I have files in pending for almost a half-year. I wrote to support a few times during this period - no signs of life.
Now I don't touch anything. Just curious, how long can it take.

Mantis:
I made about $1- $3 a month there. Been gone for several years.  They just never got any traction, showing how challenging (and expensive) it is to start a micro agency. 

Jo Ann Snover:
I haven't uploaded in a long time, but sales do trickle in (last one was in June though).

I had been thinking at the next payout (about $12 to go) I'd close my account as sales had slowed so much.

In the past, they've always paid on time, but it'll be a while to get that last $12 with the current slow pace.

I wouldn't worry about the uploads as I don't think it will make any difference to sales :) Joking aside though, I wouldn't upload anything there at this point - there's nothing happening

Microstock Posts:

--- Quote from: Jo Ann Snover on August 21, 2020, 17:43 ---I had been thinking at the next payout (about $12 to go) I'd close my account as sales had slowed so much.

--- End quote ---

Is deleting images from fair royalty sites with low earnings a view shared by other admins of the stock coalition or just your view point?

How does removing images from fair royalty sites benefit the cause of the stock coalition succinctly described in the tagline "get more for your work"?

Jo Ann Snover:

--- Quote from: Microstock Posts on August 22, 2020, 23:49 ---
--- Quote from: Jo Ann Snover on August 21, 2020, 17:43 ---I had been thinking at the next payout (about $12 to go) I'd close my account as sales had slowed so much.

--- End quote ---

Is deleting images from fair royalty sites with low earnings a view shared by other admins of the stock coalition or just your view point?

How does removing images from fair royalty sites benefit the cause of the stock coalition succinctly described in the tagline "get more for your work"?

--- End quote ---

This is just me posting about my accounts.

I've stuck with StockFresh since 2011. There were many promises about marketing efforts that would be made once the collection got to a certain size. We uploaded, the collection reached that size but the marketing never happened.

I understand that it's not easy to get a site off the ground, but the fact that Peter Hamza had done it before with StockXpert was enough reason to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I wouldn't define a hypothetical site as fair overall if it didn't do any/much marketing and didn't have any sales - wouldn't matter what the royalty rates or other terms were. I have no quarrel with StockFresh's stated goals for compensation which are all very fair. The problem is that there's a trickle of mostly 35 cent subscriptions and the subscription model only works for contributors if there's sales volume.

https://stockfresh.com/info/contributors

My notion of getting more for my work (and again, I'm speaking for me, not for the Coalition) is that I get more money, not a theoretical royalty rate and zero dollars in my account.

But then perhaps you weren't really asking a question, but looking to suggest hypocrisy on my part?

I think I have been and plan to continue to be transparent about what I do and why. I am not the Stock Coalition, but I'm helping it because I think the goals are worth my effort.

I think sticking with StockFresh for 9 years even though there have been very few sales over that time means I've given them a fair chance. I don't think they're likely to turn things around in the current market environment.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page