If you want to earn $50 per 6 or 8 months with 6k photos, then yes.  Otherwise, don't bother.  My only worse earner is GL, and that one is dead, dead, DEAD.

Not many, one of the worst performing stock agencies. If you already have a large portfolio uploaded, leave it there. But it's hardly worth it if you're a newcomer.

I uploaded about 1400 files there in 2011 when I left iStock exclusivity thinking I'd give it a shot as the guy behind it was one of the founders of StockXpert.

It never really took off, but I made about $50 a year (that's not a typo) until fall 2015. Since then I've made about $28 and sales appear to have dried up. I can't see any reason to upload there.

They don't sell a lot but I only spend about 10 minutes a year on the site and the amount they make is worth it.  As they pay 50%, I will carry on uploading when I have nothing better to do.

Yes, they have pretty decent royalty option.
I really wish they'd marketed the product properly.

Yes, they have pretty decent royalty option.
I really wish they'd marketed the product properly.

They never will. And it's a shame, they could have very well been one of the major players in the business now if they had done it right years ago. They emerged right at the time that both buyers and contributors were getting really frustrated with istock. Buyers with the changing prices and confusing credit costs, and contributors with the RC system and decreasing earnings. Stockfresh emerged with a simple credit system and a fair royalty rate. And on the heels of StockXpert, which was largely viewed among contributors as a good agency.

It was almost perfect. You really couldn't set up a more advantageous situation for an emerging agency. If only they had taken advantage of it and made themselves visible in the market all those years ago.

Instead, they skipped marketing almost entirely, and no one ever noticed them. They hardly sell anything, and we hardly earn anything as a result.

My sales on stockfresh are very rare too, but I keep uploading as it is one of the easiest to upload, their commissions are good, the support is also good and most of all, they do not accept all the crap. Sometimes I get rejections, but I wish shutterstock would pay just half as much attention to quality of the images. So I want to keep supporting them, I think they deserve it.

To put it moneywise - it takes very little effort to upload my images, and it's nice too get a payout every now and then.

A lot of sites spent too much on marketing and are no longer around.  I don't mind the few that haven't spent much but have been around for years and pay 50%.  They aren't exciting but over many years they still make enough money to keep me uploading.

Looking at sales over the last year, the lowest royalty I find is .35.  More common were .50, $1 and some for $2.  But sales of any kind are rare enough that I only upload new images when they make me sales.  SF has never produced more than a trickle for me.

I made $2-$4 a month, rarely $10.  I close my account.

You can't use 'sales' and ' Stockfresh' in the same sentence

You just did