You probably don't want to hear this, but I'll say it anyway.

I don't think the problem is with StockXpert, but rather with your images. It's clear that StockXpert has some sort of tiered reviewing system whereby commercially viable images are accepted much more readily than mediocre/run-of-the-mill ones.

Instead of complaining about how long your images take to get reviewed or how such-and-such site unfairly rejects so many of them, you'd be better off by asking yourself why this is happening to you and not others.

I'm sorry if this offends you, forwardcom, but it is the unpleasant truth, and the sooner you accept it the further ahead (and wealthier) you will be.

I don't know if sharply_done is correct, but I've often read about long review times at StockXpert and I must say that I don't have such problem: my recent photos have been reviewed (and accepted) within a few hours to 1 day.

Concerning earnings, I was bullish on this site until december, but I'm now a little bit worried with slow sales since the begining of the year compared to october/november which were stellar for me.

I haven't uploaded to StockXpert in a while, but I haven't had many problems other than the reviewing problem a couple of months ago. I have noticed that vector illustrations seem to clear faster than photographs. But other than that, it only takes a few days for my photographs to be approved.

StockXpert reviews my images within 24 hours usually, and they are currently in a very close race for 2nd in my monthly earnings rankings (with SS). Earnings have increased each and every month since I joined in May of last year.