Author Topic: Stockxpert's 'Opinion needed on subscriptions' thread (Read 2188 times)

Randomway · « **on:** April 01, 2009, 17:26 »

I was wondering what others thought of an idea being proposed at Stockxpert.

http://www.stockxpert.com/forum/show_messages/23961

I'd like to see the size of sub images reduced, but I'm not sure about the change to opt-in. I know some folks here are currently opted out of the subscriptions plan. Do you think it would be a good trade off?

vonkara · « **Reply #1 on:** April 01, 2009, 17:42 »

I added to the discussion there. I always thought about a number of credits available / day instead of a number of images... Thanks for having linked this thread Randomway!

madelaide · « **Reply #2 on:** April 01, 2009, 17:57 »

I don't like that. I hate subs.

Vonkara, I hadn't read your post there, and I made a similar suggestion. IS subs is the only type I consider edible.

Freedom · « **Reply #3 on:** April 01, 2009, 18:02 »

I vote for the file size restriction.

I think by restricting the file sizes, many contributors may opt in voluntarily.

madelaide · « **Reply #4 on:** April 01, 2009, 18:05 »

Freedom,

They meant to make trade: limiting sizes but forcing opt-in.

Regards,
Adelaide

Freedom · « **Reply #5 on:** April 01, 2009, 18:24 »

Adelaide, I know, I was only agreeing to Part 1. I also agree with you that they should consider the IS model since they are all under Getty now.

gbcimages · « **Reply #6 on:** April 01, 2009, 18:49 »

I also think it's fair for us contributors. that is restricting the size.

fotografer · « **Reply #7 on:** April 03, 2009, 02:49 »

I really hope that they change it. I am opted in anyway so it can only be good for me. I hate selling large sizes so cheaply so this will make it much more acceptable.