Author Topic: StockXpert rejections (Read 4825 times)

boatman · « **on:** December 19, 2007, 09:07 »

Well after waiting weeks for 68 images to be reviewed, they have taken 4 and rejected the rest. I guess I am not suprised.
I don't know the reason as I don't get emails telling me despite having the box ticked, and contacting support. They say I should be getting the mails.
I know StockXpert is a good earner for some, so I will keep trying, but I must admit, I keep thinking I might pull the plug there.

vonkara · « **Reply #1 on:** December 19, 2007, 09:51 »

It's very strange. I started in microstock whit DT and IS about 6 months ago. Not very long but. I submited some bad pictures to them mostly because of my unexperience. That affected my acceptance ratio.

I started whit StockXpert and SS about 2 or 3 months later whit a bit more experience and most of my pictures was accepted. Now I have the same acceptance ratio that I haved first whit DT and IS. Even if there's a world of difference between my old files and my newest. Whit a better acceptance at StockXpert and SS (even if we don't see it...reviewer must have it), about all my pictures are accepted since I submit there.
(Note: little portfolio)

What I want to say it's in my own humble point of view, the acceptance ratio is making a huge difference in the time a reviewer will take to review a picture and be more picky. My background whit IS and DT is maybe making my acceptance difficult.

boatman · « **Reply #2 on:** December 19, 2007, 11:29 »

You may well be right, I have a large rejection rate at StockXpert although most of the rejected images have been accepted on IS, SS, etc.
Guess they just don't want my type of images.

vonkara · « **Reply #3 on:** December 19, 2007, 11:41 »

Yes. I forgot and you just say it. It could be the type of files they want. It depend on what reason they give...

CCK · « **Reply #4 on:** December 27, 2007, 23:38 »

The way submissions are accepted or rejected often don't make sense, and that goes for all the agencies. I recently submitted a batch of 35 to StockXpert, only 23 were accepted. Rejected photos were accepted by SS (that means no noise), IS (they accept only perfect photos), DT, FT, 123, BS CS and FP as well as some smaller agencies. As we deal with different reviewers, we can really not expect absolute consistency, even at the same agency. An example, the photos I used to get accepted at IS were rejected a week later. This is just something we have to live with.

lobby · « **Reply #5 on:** January 06, 2008, 11:27 »

This is my LAST mail to StockXpert

"hi

I think there is a big problem with your rewiers is there any one checkig them or what?

?

rejecting images with "not isolated as stated" what's that new???

Why don't you check first your data base with the word "isolated" to find images from your rewiers that are not isolated or on white background at all.

You can't have reviers that are also photographers in your site to judge others people work.

be serious for a while

I'm waiting my images to be
rewied again....

OK?

?
"

I've been arouny in StockXpert forum and i find out that there are photographers that are rewiers also.!!!

My last batch was 92 images witch were waiting from 20 december to reject them in 6 of january

In this batch i have about 80% percent acceptance in all 18 sites i submit my images, even in

istock i had the best acceptance ever with this batch of images, but for StockXpert were't ok for "bull crap"

reasons.

Well dear fellows some time we have to think about bad behavor of some sites like StockXpert.

They forget that they are getting money from others people work so the first think they have to

do is to respect those from whom they are getting their money from

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: StockXpert rejections (Read 4825 times)

boatman

vonkara

boatman

vonkara

CCK

lobby

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors