removed.
apparently you have to pay to get a site hosted on their servers. ::)
How do you envision the future landscape for the indies?
If a photographer has also some illustrations, should he set up one site on grfx.com and another with photos only on Symbiostock?
Leo,
How do you envision the future landscape for the indies?
If a photographer has also some illustrations, should he set up one site on grfx.com and another with photos only on Symbiostock?
Photographers will not find it useful since it does not support property/model releases.
Photographers will not find it useful since it does not support property/model releases.
Is this the only reason why it's not for photographers?
Then I don't understand.
Because Releases normally do not need to be shown to the end customer, they are there to protect the photographer. Agencies demand to see Releases because they do not trust photographers to have them done correctly.
But when you are selling direct, there is no agency - hence no need to upload and manage releases anywhere (still the need to have them on file somewhere in your home or office, but that does not affect the website you're selling through).
The only thing a customer will be interested in is to see whether MR / PR is available for a specific photo. A little check box when uploading a photo, a little text to show the customer.
What am I missing?
Photographers will not find it useful since it does not support property/model releases.
Is this the only reason why it's not for photographers?
Then I don't understand.
Because Releases normally do not need to be shown to the end customer, they are there to protect the photographer. Agencies demand to see Releases because they do not trust photographers to have them done correctly.
But when you are selling direct, there is no agency - hence no need to upload and manage releases anywhere (still the need to have them on file somewhere in your home or office, but that does not affect the website you're selling through).
The only thing a customer will be interested in is to see whether MR / PR is available for a specific photo. A little check box when uploading a photo, a little text to show the customer.
What am I missing?
It looks like your not missing anything. Here is grfx workflow:grfx itself is highly intentioned toward graphic artists and illustrators, but of course its open source and freely usable...
- Upload image.
- Uploaded image is processed manually or by server queue.
- Metadata is extracted, turned into a stock image based on presets/defaults.
- (Optional) you modify prices / licenses of image.
- Image becomes available as a specialized woocommerce product.
Our illustrator services are optional of course. We keep a market advantage by employing open source on the same philosophy as Blender 3d or Wordpress itself.
I cannot stress it enough though - our position in indi-stock is of biggest relevance here. We simply are not serving microstockers. Bringing your work into grfx in itself makes it indi-stock. You've just started your climb out of a dying trend. 8)
Photographers will not find it useful since it does not support property/model releases.
Is this the only reason why it's not for photographers?
Then I don't understand.
Because Releases normally do not need to be shown to the end customer, they are there to protect the photographer. Agencies demand to see Releases because they do not trust photographers to have them done correctly.
But when you are selling direct, there is no agency - hence no need to upload and manage releases anywhere (still the need to have them on file somewhere in your home or office, but that does not affect the website you're selling through).
The only thing a customer will be interested in is to see whether MR / PR is available for a specific photo. A little check box when uploading a photo, a little text to show the customer.
What am I missing?
It looks like your not missing anything. Here is grfx workflow:grfx itself is highly intentioned toward graphic artists and illustrators, but of course its open source and freely usable...
- Upload image.
- Uploaded image is processed manually or by server queue.
- Metadata is extracted, turned into a stock image based on presets/defaults.
- (Optional) you modify prices / licenses of image.
- Image becomes available as a specialized woocommerce product.
Our illustrator services are optional of course. We keep a market advantage by employing open source on the same philosophy as Blender 3d or Wordpress itself.
I cannot stress it enough though - our position in indi-stock is of biggest relevance here. We simply are not serving microstockers. Bringing your work into grfx in itself makes it indi-stock. You've just started your climb out of a dying trend. 8)
still confused -- if lack of model releases is the only thing keeping out photographers, why couldn't grfx be used by photographers who don't USE releases?
Think I really screwed up. I was getting a lot of emails about upgrading to grfx converter, and without researching enough, tried to upgrade today. Now I have no access to any of the admin pages, they are all blank white pages, but my site is still there. Looks like it is broken and I have no idea how to fix it or put it back the way it was. Any suggestions? Thanks!
Hi, could a grfx thread be started on the Illustration board? A few of us missed the original post and it would be good to have an easy reference in an obvious spot. Thanks.Maybe a bit later it might be good to do that. Ideally I had wanted to avoid too many threads in MSG.