MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Sites that no longer exist => Veer => Topic started by: ajalbert on March 06, 2010, 15:33
-
I'd initially heard a lot of information about Veer being a promising up and coming. I've experienced REALLY long review times (I've had a batch pending for over two weeks). Views are flat as well. I was just curious if anyone had heard anything more about the company. Thanks in advance
Andy
-
You would have more replies if you posted this question in the Veer forum. I don't have any other info about how Veer is doing these days, I tried them at first and then closed my account soon after because of all the rejections.
-
Whoops! Sorry to post in the wrong place. I'll re-post this
Andy
-
I just moved the thread for you.
-
They have big plans for this year. You should read this first:
http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/what%27s-in-store-at-veer-in-2010/. (http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/what%27s-in-store-at-veer-in-2010/.)
But, low earner for me still.
-
Thanks Leaf!
-
Just as I'm ready to give up on Veer, they come through today with an EL sale for $35. I haven't uploaded there in many months, but may have to start up again. To anyone who has been uploading since the beginning... are the reviewers still as wildly inconsistent as they were at the start? And are they just as likely to throw out an entire batch because one or two shots have a problem in their eyes? That -- plus the low sales ($10-20 per month on a port of a few hundred pics) -- made me give up on them in late 09.
-
It is still the same. >:(
-
My last set of image uploads is coming up on three weeks for review time...
Congrats on the EL though! Those kind of posts give me some hope.
Andy
-
They are at the bottom of my earnings every month with a total of zero sales. Seems like a good site though, so hopefully they crank up the promotion machine.
-
some sales are trickling through, but i have a very small port there. i just picked up a cute puppy get well card at trader joes with a veer copyright, but no photog attribution.