MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Approved image not seen in database for 22 days  (Read 3239 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


« on: June 22, 2011, 10:42 »
Approved images not seen in database and also image pending for 22 days :-[

« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2011, 10:47 »
Reviews at Veer are just glacial - I uploaded images June 2nd and they're still pending. I don't know if it's worth spending time on them.


« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2011, 14:14 »
40 day pass from the first submission. i hope it will worth.

« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2011, 14:35 »
Large agencies like Veer really blow their trust with contributors. I thought that an established stock agency can handle it but obviously they can't.

They had an easy start getting a huge collection, all they had to do was implement an uploading, reviewing and billing system which they should have had for years.

Communication is there but actions are missing.

We need faster reviews, higher upload limits and more sales. Sales are so slow I don't know how it could be profitable for them anymore.
Maybe this is the beginning of the end...

« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2011, 15:29 »
I just found a rejected picture:

Tuna on bread with tomato, parsley and onion rings

and the reason for rejection is: Styling (clothing, hairstyle, make-up, props, etc.) appears to be inappropriate, messy, or dated.

This is from Veer without any respect and this is not serioes, or do they want me next time to have a hairdresser for my tuna? Maybe some stylist for onions rings?


« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2011, 12:23 »
40 day pass from the first submission. i hope it will worth.


Could you send an email over to [email protected] with your account information?  This seems like it may be an issue with your tax and royalty forms rather than a site error, but I'll only be able to look into it if you email us directly.


As mentioned in the email back and forth we had yesterday, that message is intended to be general (hence the 'props, etc.') and not necessarily meant specifically for model shots, though I can see where the confusion would stem from.  In the case of images of food we find unsuitable for our site, we will usually use a more general rejection message. 
Thanks for the feedback, we are always looking to hone our rejection messages, and due to the volume of food images we receive, it sounds like we could use some messaging specifically oriented for that subject matter.

« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2011, 13:08 »
I have the exact same problem.  Uploaded back in October, waited a couple months for my images to get approved, then never got a single sale.  I checked this weekend and noticed I had 0 views, and not a single image of mine appears in search.  What a titanic waste of time.


Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
Last post July 29, 2007, 08:52
by nicklaw17
3 Replies
Last post July 18, 2008, 17:07
by HermanM
19 Replies
Last post April 11, 2013, 09:39
by Tryingmybest
4 Replies
Last post July 09, 2019, 17:48
by gnirtS
21 Replies
Last post July 31, 2023, 13:00
by Jo Ann Snover


Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results