MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Sites that no longer exist => Veer => Topic started by: U11 on January 22, 2016, 13:27
-
http://www.corbisimages.com/content/corbisfaq/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Veer_Wilson_Contributor_English&utm_content=2016_Jan (http://www.corbisimages.com/content/corbisfaq/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Veer_Wilson_Contributor_English&utm_content=2016_Jan)
-
Haven't got the email about the commission cut yet, what's taking them so long :)
-
I doubt Veer will be absorbed into Getty its the same indy content thats already on iS.
-
It is in the FAQ (see a link in a first message)
What content will Getty Images represent after the transition?
GI will represent Corbis creative stills, Corbis Motion content, and Corbis archival and documentary content, inclusive of the prestigious Bettmann and Sygma archives, via the GettyImages.com website.
-
I doubt Veer will be absorbed into Getty its the same indy content thats already on iS.
Unless they find a way to bury the stuff directly uploaded to IS and push the veer content to the top paying penies as a partner program sale rather than the standard comission.
-
It is in the FAQ (see a link in a first message)
What content will Getty Images represent after the transition?
GI will represent Corbis creative stills, Corbis Motion content, and Corbis archival and documentary content, inclusive of the prestigious Bettmann and Sygma archives, via the GettyImages.com website.
Hmm looks like they'd be dropping Veer then? Unless they categorize it under "creative stills"... Not a lot of difference though, it's not like Veer was earning anything noticeable.
-
It's like buying sponges on the Titanic.