Author Topic: Kudos for Big Stock (Read 4358 times)

WarrenPrice · « **on:** February 09, 2011, 11:15 »

My photo was rejected. But ... for the first time ever (I think) a reviewer gave a specific reason for rejecting a specific image:

Reason: blown out highlight in the rice. thank you.

Can't get much more specific than that.

PS: I knew the highlight was blown but thought it could sneak through. BS saved me the embarrassment of having a buyer think my photography sucks.

Thank you Big Stock.

scottbraut · « **Reply #1 on:** February 09, 2011, 11:19 »

Thanks Warren,

I'll pass this to the content and review team and I'm sure they'll appreciate it.

Best,

Scott

visceralimage · « **Reply #2 on:** February 09, 2011, 22:11 »

Quote from: WarrenPrice on February 09, 2011, 11:15

My photo was rejected. But ... for the first time ever (I think) a reviewer gave a specific reason for rejecting a specific image:

Reason: blown out highlight in the rice. thank you.

Can't get much more specific than that.

PS: I knew the highlight was blown but thought it could sneak through. BS saved me the embarrassment of having a buyer think my photography sucks.

Thank you Big Stock.

Warren

You remind me of my favorite saying "I have standards, they're low, but I HAVE standards" (say the caps with stronger emphasis). Maybe it is time to raise your standards a tad; blown highlights are for newbies.

WarrenPrice · « **Reply #3 on:** February 10, 2011, 10:22 »

Probably true. Must be the WalMart in me.

Still, it was a step in the right direction for BigStock reviewers. I wish all my blown highlights could be so specifically noted.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Kudos for Big Stock (Read 4358 times)

WarrenPrice

scottbraut

visceralimage

WarrenPrice

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors