Quote from: CoisaX on March 11, 2012, 20:43
But Alamy don't evaluate "Commercial Value"...

Actually, as low earner, I'm not worried with rejection on FT, because I sale the old same files...

Agree about that, but almost half of my FT rejections are technical problems, and no other agency can see them (SS, DT, 123, Alamy....)

I believe it's because of photo style, not about any technical problem like CA, sharpness, noise... because I dont have them.

.

Quote from: Wim on March 14, 2012, 19:47
.

Aw that's not fair, I was about to reply 

Quote from: Microstock Posts on March 14, 2012, 20:10

Quote from: Wim on March 14, 2012, 19:47
.

Aw that's not fair, I was about to reply 

I am sure you still can, with "@#$#@*% ..." 

Quote from: CD123 on March 14, 2012, 22:06

Quote from: Microstock Posts on March 14, 2012, 20:10

Quote from: Wim on March 14, 2012, 19:47
.

Aw that's not fair, I was about to reply  

I am sure you still can, with "@#$#@*% ..."  

Anyway, without going in to the specifics, all I can say to Wim is try again in 6 months and space them.

Ah, sorry guys.

Out of respect for Leaf I sometimes remove my comments. I always think we could put him in a bad spot with comments like this.

Anyway, I'm already fed up with it, I cannot go on like this. I think I will go Macrostock all the way pretty soon, they might not be the best/fastest earners but at least their reviewers are not corrupted (not just DT btw)

Respect to all of you who just take this and move on, I wish I could do it.

Wim