MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Introducing Adobe Stock!  (Read 107634 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #325 on: June 20, 2015, 10:33 »
+7
Great news!  I look forward to seeing a rise in sales on FT (thanks to AS).

I totally agree though with what alot of you have been saying regarding the fact that FT need to consider accepting Editorial images.  Editorial images are a big big seller for me through SS and FT really do need to consider 'tapping' into this.


« Reply #326 on: June 20, 2015, 11:21 »
+1
Haven't had a single sale to tip me over to silver in 9 days! Unusual.

Rinderart

« Reply #327 on: June 20, 2015, 15:40 »
+2
Wonder what the hangup on editorial Is?...mat?

Semmick Photo

« Reply #328 on: June 20, 2015, 16:25 »
+1
Wonder what the hangup on editorial Is?...mat?
a legal wasp nest they don't want to get in to. Too much cost involved to train reviewers and review editorial images. Same goes for CanStockPhoto

Rinderart

« Reply #329 on: June 20, 2015, 19:02 »
0
Could be it. Thanks.

« Reply #330 on: June 20, 2015, 23:03 »
+3
Editorial on fotolia will be a good step.

As of now, is fotolia Adobe stock? Or will they partner with other players as well

« Reply #331 on: June 21, 2015, 11:33 »
+4
Matt, found on other forums that Adobe does massive give away of imagery to attract new clients. Here msg members can comment on this, because i am not a new user. For all of us it will be interesting to know that Fotolia and Adobe will keep guarantees of user setting, for example: no free, no exclusive. You answered that you forwarded this to the team, but now this question about give away arrives regarding Adobe itself. Any progress on this? Please comment.

« Reply #332 on: June 21, 2015, 11:42 »
0
Matt, one more question, i live in Lima, Peru, from here i cant see adobe stock website, why i not avaible in my country? in which countrys is avaible? and when i can see adobe stock website?  :-\ 

« Reply #333 on: June 21, 2015, 14:43 »
+2
Wonder what the hangup on editorial Is?...mat?
a legal wasp nest they don't want to get in to. Too much cost involved to train reviewers and review editorial images. Same goes for CanStockPhoto

Maybe. But smaller sites like 123RF, DepositPhotos and Dreams time seem to manage it. It would seem to me that if Fotolia is serious about taking on Shutterstock and Getty, then they need to step it up and get into editorial.

« Reply #334 on: June 21, 2015, 15:36 »
0
Wonder what the hangup on editorial Is?...mat?
a legal wasp nest they don't want to get in to. Too much cost involved to train reviewers and review editorial images. Same goes for CanStockPhoto

Maybe. But smaller sites like 123RF, DepositPhotos and Dreams time seem to manage it. It would seem to me that if Fotolia is serious about taking on Shutterstock and Getty, then they need to step it up and get into editorial.

From the outside, the FT and AS "Dream Team" looks a whole lot more competitive and this will worry SS - adding editorial images to their repetoire will surely have SS quaking in their boots.

« Reply #335 on: June 21, 2015, 16:54 »
0
Matt, one more question, i live in Lima, Peru, from here i cant see adobe stock website, why i not avaible in my country? in which countrys is avaible? and when i can see adobe stock website?  :-\

https://stock.adobe.com/ doesn't work?

Does clicking the stock tab on your creative cloud app pull up the search and such?

« Reply #336 on: June 21, 2015, 17:23 »
0
Matt, one more question, i live in Lima, Peru, from here i cant see adobe stock website, why i not avaible in my country? in which countrys is avaible? and when i can see adobe stock website?  :-\

https://stock.adobe.com/ doesn't work?

Does clicking the stock tab on your creative cloud app pull up the search and such?

In my country doesnt work  :-[ i wonder, how many countries have the same resault?


« Reply #337 on: June 21, 2015, 17:43 »
+1
Matt, one more question, i live in Lima, Peru, from here i cant see adobe stock website, why i not avaible in my country? in which countrys is avaible? and when i can see adobe stock website?  :-\

https://stock.adobe.com/ doesn't work?

Does clicking the stock tab on your creative cloud app pull up the search and such?

In my country doesnt work  :-[ i wonder, how many countries have the same resault?
wull darn.

Guess moving is your only option. lol

« Reply #338 on: June 21, 2015, 17:51 »
+1
Matt, one more question, i live in Lima, Peru, from here i cant see adobe stock website, why i not avaible in my country? in which countrys is avaible? and when i can see adobe stock website?  :-\

https://stock.adobe.com/ doesn't work?

Does clicking the stock tab on your creative cloud app pull up the search and such?

In my country doesnt work  :-[ i wonder, how many countries have the same resault?
wull darn.

Guess moving is your only option. lol

mmmmm you make me smile, but, im dont kidding!

how many countries cant buy from adobe stock right now? think about it! adobe make this big release but dont work for everybody! ok in US work but what happend with all adobe users around the world?

« Reply #339 on: June 21, 2015, 18:07 »
+1
they will continue to roll it out in other markets, just give it time

they had to do the bigger markets rollouts first - the rest will follow

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #340 on: June 21, 2015, 19:03 »
0
Shurely shome mishtake:

I went to update my Adobe apps and got a message that I'd save 40% by purchasing stock via Adobe Stock.


Then when I clicked on Add Adobe Stock, suddenly the offer changed to a reduction of 33%:

Classic bait-and-switch.

I decided to compare with what the Fotolia prices are. It seems I'm entitled to a 20% discount at Ft, but the original prics are there too, scored out:

Can someone please explain to me how the Adobe price is 40%, or even 33%, off the Fotolia price?

« Reply #341 on: June 21, 2015, 19:07 »
+1
The annual plan is 33% off the monthly plan.  The monthly plan can't seriously be called a subscription but they do.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #342 on: June 21, 2015, 19:19 »
0
The annual plan is 33% off the monthly plan.  The monthly plan can't seriously be called a subscription but they do.

Can't you get an annual plan directly from Ft? I couldn't find it.


And what's the 40%, which wasn't qualified in any way on the first screenshot?
« Last Edit: June 21, 2015, 19:23 by ShadySue »

« Reply #343 on: June 21, 2015, 19:27 »
+3
Fotolia has a very complex system for pricing with what seems like hundreds of options, I think they'll simplify it and then slowly phase Fotolia out.

KB

« Reply #344 on: June 21, 2015, 19:30 »
+4
And what's the 40%, which wasn't qualified in any way on the first screenshot?
40% is 33% rounded up.  ;D

« Reply #345 on: June 22, 2015, 06:23 »
+1
So, customers get a big discount when buying images if they pay a monthly fee to Adobe C.C. ... but photographer's don't get nothing of this monthly fee.

« Reply #346 on: June 22, 2015, 06:43 »
+1
Matt, we need you comments, please.

« Reply #347 on: June 22, 2015, 06:55 »
0
So, customers get a big discount when buying images if they pay a monthly fee to Adobe C.C. ... but photographer's don't get nothing of this monthly fee.

That's not so weird. We aren't selling Adobe CC, we're selling images. And we're guaranteed a price floor.

Semmick Photo

« Reply #348 on: June 22, 2015, 07:00 »
+2
Maybe I need to hold off for a minute before I go down on my knees to ask for my return to FT   ;)

« Reply #349 on: June 22, 2015, 07:07 »
+7
So, customers get a big discount when buying images if they pay a monthly fee to Adobe C.C. ... but photographer's don't get nothing of this monthly fee.

As I understand it we (contributors) get nothing of that discount (in terms of reduced royalty rates).
Which is fine.
I never expected to get a share of Adobe's monthly fee for their software.
If they promote their new stock offering by reducing fees for existing CC subscribers (without making us pay for their marketing efforts like most of the other micros do - when e.g. IS give customers rebates contributors received reduced royalties) I don't see anything negative about that.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
5721 Views
Last post June 19, 2015, 13:09
by Rage
3 Replies
4826 Views
Last post June 18, 2015, 13:29
by Sean Locke Photography
17 Replies
7562 Views
Last post November 27, 2015, 10:38
by logeeker
6 Replies
9226 Views
Last post August 18, 2017, 17:25
by SpaceStockFootage
402 Replies
82734 Views
Last post June 13, 2022, 14:36
by JaenStock

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors