I was just randomly scrolling trough a video collection and in a newly uploaded files bumped on to this ?
https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/cycling-woman-bicycle-young-woman-in-red-leggings-and-white-hoodie-riding-a-bike-on-a-sunny-park-path-for-a-healthy-fitness-lifestyle/2018620756
At first I was laughing but then started to think about - where this industry goes if this kind of cheap pornography attempt and "only fans" kind of content ends up in a stock collection ?
Where Adobe as one of a leading agencies in this industry going with accepting this ? Was it just just a random acceptance ?
NO. That portfolio is also full of same cheap content such as this :
https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/cycling-coast-woman-rides-a-bicycle-along-a-scenic-seaside-path-on-a-sunny-day-for-fitness-and-leisure/2017742661
or
https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/woman-bikini-sea-standing-in-clear-ocean-water-on-a-summer-vacation-day-vertical-video/1980800041
It seems that Adobe deliberately accepts this kind of material and it makes me sick.
P.S.
Not to mention that their own rules of submittin content don't allow this kind of sexualized material.
This is an AI video of a woman driving a bike in sports clothes. Nothing more. The whole account is full of fitness videos showing various people of all genders doing various sports.
Your complaint rather shows that we have a problem with over-sexualizing women doing everyday tasks.
Quote from: Her Ugliness on May 15, 2026, 10:47
This is an AI video of a woman driving a bike in sports clothes. Nothing more. The whole account is full of fitness videos showing various people of all genders doing various sports.
Your complaint rather shows that we have a problem with over-sexualizing women doing everyday tasks.
Fortunately ( if that can be said about this kind of content ) this is NOT ai video. It is very organic and human created video. At 0:20 of this video you can actually see a shadow of insta 360 camera attached on a bike and that is clear proof that this is NOT ai video.
If that was ai video we would have much bigger problem with acceptance of an ai crap in organic collection considering that this video isn't flagged as ai as we all can see.
That over-sexualizing thing that you said - I couldn't agree with you more. That is why I was free to state that this kind of a content is nothing but a "only fans" material.
This is a joke....your post. Get a grip on life.
Quote from: Mantis on May 15, 2026, 11:19
This is a joke....your post. Get a grip on life.
Funny. You not accept other peoples opinion and getting in conversation by trying to insult them and yet asking others to get a life ?
Well m8....when you give advice about cleaning a house, clear your own first. Or should I come down to your level and say - get a life first and than speak to others ?
Ha ha wonder what you gonna say about my video that sold this past week https://stock.adobe.com/stock-photo/id/1694743932
Quote from: rushay on May 15, 2026, 13:47
Ha ha wonder what you gonna say about my video that sold this past week https://stock.adobe.com/stock-photo/id/1694743932
If you were read guides you would know that this sex toy kind a videos are acceptable. as long as they are not realistic ones.
Adobe (and other agencies) have accepted "sexualized" content and lower quality content in general for years. This is nothing new.
It's not nudity and although the quality is bad and it would never be usable in any serious video production, I don't see why it bothers you so much.