I thought crypto was anonymous? 
No - at least not in the sense of a record no one can examine. As the article detailed:
"Public blockchains like Solana (and Bitcoin and Ethereum) have the benefit of allowing anybody in the world to follow the money, since every transaction is tied to an address and records are permanent."
I was just pointing out the often claimed part of Crypto benefits, and it's not really true. Crypto transactions are very public.
Trump is slippery and always has been. Way before he got elected the stories were out that the only way he avoided another bankruptcy was the TV shows and that income.