MicrostockGroup Sponsors

I have been ignored by ??? users!

Started by borg, April 05, 2012, 20:42

Previous topic - Next topic

lisafx

Quote from: stockastic on April 07, 2012, 02:07
The 9 people who 'ignore' me won't get to see this story about a hilarious "stock photo" mailing by my Senator, Al Franken:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/al-franken-fundraising_n_1408686.html

OMG!  Hilarious!!!  I love Al Franken!  At least there is one comedian in congress who actually KNOWS he's a comedian and is funny on purpose ;D

cathyslife

Quote from: Zeus on April 07, 2012, 01:40
That's funny, I can't see any comments on this thread.

LOL!
#boycottShutterstock   #shutterstockBoycott

cathyslife

From Al Frankens email:

QuoteAnd whether you're a Tattooed Guitar Player, a Guy Wearing Hard Hat, or an Elderly Couple Sitting At Kitchen Table, there's no better way to show your support than by making a contribution today.

Wondering if he's talking about your hubby, Lisa!  :)
#boycottShutterstock   #shutterstockBoycott

lisafx

Quote from: cclapper on April 07, 2012, 15:38
From Al Frankens email:

QuoteAnd whether you're a Tattooed Guitar Player, a Guy Wearing Hard Hat, or an Elderly Couple Sitting At Kitchen Table, there's no better way to show your support than by making a contribution today.

Wondering if he's talking about your hubby, Lisa!  :)

Might be!  Seems like he covered all the good cliches ;D

cathyslife

Quote from: lisafx on April 07, 2012, 15:45
Quote from: cclapper on April 07, 2012, 15:38
From Al Frankens email:

QuoteAnd whether you're a Tattooed Guitar Player, a Guy Wearing Hard Hat, or an Elderly Couple Sitting At Kitchen Table, there's no better way to show your support than by making a contribution today.

Wondering if he's talking about your hubby, Lisa!  :)

Might be!  Seems like he covered all the good cliches ;D

Well, if the cliches sell your images...a sale is a sale!
#boycottShutterstock   #shutterstockBoycott

mtilghma

ignored by 0.

oddly, it makes me feel a little inadequate...
check out my website: www.MattTilghman.com

stockastic

Quote from: BaldricksTrousers on April 07, 2012, 10:53
Quote from: stockastic on April 07, 2012, 02:07
The 9 people who 'ignore' me won't get to see this story about a hilarious "stock photo" mailing by my Senator, Al Franken:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/al-franken-fundraising_n_1408686.html

You never know, they might - if sombody quotes it.

Is there an internet slang term for reposting something so it gets seen by people who might be ignoring the OP?  :-)

borg

Quote from: Zeus on April 07, 2012, 01:40
That's funny, I can't see any comments on this thread.


Hahahahahahahahahah! ;D ;D ;D

Good one!  ;)

antistock

i wonder what's the point in ignoring people on forums.
you're supposed to join a forum to actually read messages, if a mex is disturbing just scroll down, if the whole forum s-ucks just logoff and leave.

antistock

oh and i see only now i'm ignored by 5 people.

Microstock Posts

Quote from: antistock on April 09, 2012, 04:32
i wonder what's the point in ignoring people on forums.
you're supposed to join a forum to actually read messages, if a mex is disturbing just scroll down, if the whole forum s-ucks just logoff and leave.

It appeases those who want it and those who don't like it won't stop using the forum because of it. So it's a smart move and it's here to stay. Most of us probably aren't aware of how disjointed threads may be as a result of people ignoring others, as there is an element of disjointedness in forums anyway. I would prefer a troll button, if someone consistently gets reported as a troll then the forum moderator can check on his recent posts and remove him.

I'm on 2 ignores and I'm 90% sure I know who one of them is and sometimes when I see the person posting I ask the person a question, I never get a reply and it always makes me smile. The only way I would be in favour of an ignore button would be if we could see a list of the people ignoring us, that would be brilliant. Threads would take on a whole new life :D

rubyroo

#86
We had some heavy trolling in here now and then over the years, and I found some of the posts so repetitive, long and annoying, that I just had to protect my eyes from the invasion.  Not what I came here for, so I put them on 'ignore'.  In instances like that, I very much appreciate the facility.

wut

For all you not understanding ppl putting others on ignore, I could also say I like everybody. Here it goes: I like everybody. Some I like to be around, some I like to avoid and others I'd like to punch in the face ;)

CD123

Quote from: wut on April 09, 2012, 18:45
For all you not understanding ppl putting others on ignore, I could also say I like everybody. Here it goes: I like everybody. Some I like to be around, some I like to avoid and others I'd like to punch in the face ;)

likewise 

CD123

#89
Think there should be balance between the "useful post" and its alternative, which, IMO, should be on the same level and not an all together "ban from reading all posts" effect.

Rather have 2 buttons (heart and a scull/Troll character or something like that) Useful Post = 1 point - Troll / Idiot remark = -1, both can be displayed and the end result, by deducting the one from the other. You should then end up with a sort of Useful Member Total.

The "ignore" option can perhaps still be left for those who want to use the extreme option.

grp_photo

Quote from: Mantis on April 07, 2012, 01:33
Quote from: fotografer on April 06, 2012, 23:02
i wish the SS forums had an ignore button.  I'd go there much more often if they did.

A BIG +1
funny can't remember than I last used the SS forums must have been years, I think I forgot that SS has a forum

stockastic

How about a compromise.  If you 'ignore' someone, the forum simply collapses their post to a single line, showing just the name but no content.  There's a '+' you can click on if you want to expand the post and actually see it.

stockastic

Quote from: lisafx on April 07, 2012, 15:16
Quote from: stockastic on April 07, 2012, 02:07
The 9 people who 'ignore' me won't get to see this story about a hilarious "stock photo" mailing by my Senator, Al Franken:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/al-franken-fundraising_n_1408686.html

OMG!  Hilarious!!!  I love Al Franken!  At least there is one comedian in congress who actually KNOWS he's a comedian and is funny on purpose ;D

I live in Minneapolis and Al Franken is my Senator.  During the campaign, he tried so hard to come off as totally serious. During that endless recount, he was almost grim, even though the opportunites for gags were limitless.  But, the guy can't stop being funny and once in a while he cuts loose.

lisafx

Quote from: stockastic on April 09, 2012, 22:22
How about a compromise.  If you 'ignore' someone, the forum simply collapses their post to a single line, showing just the name but no content.  There's a '+' you can click on if you want to expand the post and actually see it.

We have something similar to that now.  There's a button to view a post by and ignored member.  I do that sometimes just to see if I'm missing anything.  Nine times out of ten it's just the same stuff that caused me to ignore them in the first place.  Once in awhile I have seen someone who started out seeming like a troll, but eventually began making more useful or interesting posts, then I've unignored them. 

stockastic

Quote from: lisafx on April 09, 2012, 22:43
Quote from: stockastic on April 09, 2012, 22:22
How about a compromise.  If you 'ignore' someone, the forum simply collapses their post to a single line, showing just the name but no content.  There's a '+' you can click on if you want to expand the post and actually see it.

We have something similar to that now.  There's a button to view a post by and ignored member. 
I've never ignored anyone, so I don't know what (if anything) the forum displays for a post from an ignored poster.  Are you saying it already does what I suggested?

ShadySue

Quote from: stockastic on April 09, 2012, 23:55
Quote from: lisafx on April 09, 2012, 22:43
Quote from: stockastic on April 09, 2012, 22:22
How about a compromise.  If you 'ignore' someone, the forum simply collapses their post to a single line, showing just the name but no content.  There's a '+' you can click on if you want to expand the post and actually see it.

We have something similar to that now.  There's a button to view a post by and ignored member. 
I've never ignored anyone, so I don't know what (if anything) the forum displays for a post from an ignored poster.  Are you saying it already does what I suggested?
Yup.

cathyslife

Quote from: lisafx on April 09, 2012, 22:43
Quote from: stockastic on April 09, 2012, 22:22
How about a compromise.  If you 'ignore' someone, the forum simply collapses their post to a single line, showing just the name but no content.  There's a '+' you can click on if you want to expand the post and actually see it.

We have something similar to that now.  There's a button to view a post by and ignored member.  I do that sometimes just to see if I'm missing anything.  Nine times out of ten it's just the same stuff that caused me to ignore them in the first place.  Once in awhile I have seen someone who started out seeming like a troll, but eventually began making more useful or interesting posts, then I've unignored them. 

Same here. And most of the time, the couple of people I have ignored get quoted so I end up having to read their stuff anyway.
#boycottShutterstock   #shutterstockBoycott

cascoly

Quote from: Microstock Posts on April 09, 2012, 06:44

Most of us probably aren't aware of how disjointed threads may be as a result of people ignoring others, as there is an element of disjointedness in forums anyway. I would prefer a troll button, if someone consistently gets reported as a troll then the forum moderator can check on his recent posts and remove him. ....
The only way I would be in favour of an ignore button would be if we could see a list of the people ignoring us, that would be brilliant. Threads would take on a whole new life :D

unless you 'ignore ' people just because they disagree with you, there's no disruption - you just see the ignoired person responded and you can then read or not at your choice.  if you do choose to ignore those with adifferent opinion, then it's your own fault if you cant understand a conversation!  but evben here, there will be quotes using the ignored content

as far as moderator banning people, 1/ that would be a suppression of free speech, and 2/ a burden/responsibility that the moderator doesnt need

there's no reason to tell who's ignoring - that would be an invasion of privacy, and the ignroed person has no right to know.  since it's a personal decision to ignore, it harms no one. 
Steve Estvanik 
travel & photo blog https://cascoly-images.com

stockastic

#98
I think it's hard to distinguish suppression of listening from suppression of speech.  If I get up to speak in a 'public' forum, but everyone covers their ears when I walk up to the microphone, I don't get heard.  Has my 'right' to speak been violated?  At some level I think it has.  

Obviously if someone gets the microphone and drones on in an irrational rant, they should be stopped.  But that's seldom the case here.  I have to admit, I'm sort of at a loss as to why 9 people are ignoring me.  It would be interesting to know the real reasons.

This forum isn't a governing body in a democracy, it has no responsibilities and doesn't have to meet any standards, really.  I  feel like it should.  Fair play and all that.   But that's just me.

wut

Quote from: stockastic on April 10, 2012, 03:11
I think it's hard to distinguish suppression of listening from suppression of speech.  If I get up to speak in a 'public' forum, but everyone covers their ears when I walk up to the microphone, I don't get heard.  Has my 'right' to speak been violated?  At some level I think it has.  

Obviously if someone gets the microphone and drones on in an irrational rant, they should be stopped.  But that's seldom the case here.  I have to admit, I'm sort of at a loss as to why 9 people are ignoring me.  It would be interesting to know the real reasons.

This forum isn't a governing body in a democracy, it has no responsibilities and doesn't have to meet any standards, really.  I  feel like it should.  Fair play and all that.   But that's just me.

Some ppl are * idiots. Nothing more. I think that covers it pretty well. As for the other half (or the exact part of ppl, whatever it is), well it's democracy at its best. Look at it this way, at least you get some honesty, when ppl (ignores) are anonymous. You at least know how many ppl don't like you. It might be a problem if you can't handle honesty though (in case it doesn't suit you of course). I for one, would like to see more honesty from ppl, I mean in my face honesty ;)