I have Lightroom 4 and I love it BUT as I am doing a lot of brush editing I am finding it sloooooooooow. I mean I have a new i5 8GB ram Windows 7 PC built for music making which processes a lot of audio as fast as lightning. So why do I have time to go and make a cup of tea before the movement of my editing executes ? Not good enough Adobe Grrrrrrrr 

And while I am on the subject, why when you want to erase some marks with either the brush or the clone does the mark still show despite all your efforts ?

Speed on brush and clone has improved with LR5 but it still an issue. Doesnt matter if you have lots of power, its LR that is the culprit.

Lightroom is a great software in every aspect EXCEPT for brush editing.

I suspect the non-destructive model is not really suitable for this sort of editing, which is better done in the old fashioned way with your favourite photo editor instead.

I don't want to pay for LR5 until the upgrade is worth the money. I didn't think the new features were very exciting.

Quote from: stockphotoeurope on October 31, 2013, 12:02
Lightroom is a great software in every aspect EXCEPT for brush editing.

I suspect the non-destructive model is not really suitable for this sort of editing, which is better done in the old fashioned way with your favourite photo editor instead.

+1

If you have lens correction on it slows things down.
You can turn it off while using the brush and then turn it back on when your done.

Add more memory.

Quote from: Herg on October 31, 2013, 11:26

And while I am on the subject, why when you want to erase some marks with either the brush or the clone does the mark still show despite all your efforts ?

Increase the opacity to 100%

I'm running LR4 on an older iMac with 8 gigs of RAM and see no slow down with brush editing.  I read somewhere, on Adobe's site perhaps, several tips on improving LR performance.  You might want to search around and see if you can make some changes to the way you have the program set up that will help it run quicker.

Quote from: DonLand on October 31, 2013, 14:21

Quote from: Herg on October 31, 2013, 11:26

And while I am on the subject, why when you want to erase some marks with either the brush or the clone does the mark still show despite all your efforts ?

Increase the opacity to 100%

Always is.

Make sure the clone copy area does not have a spot and finally the only other thing is the retouched area falls within the inner circle of the brush and not just the outer circle of the feather area.

I've got i7-3770 3,4 GHz with 32 GB RAM.
Win 7 64-bit installed on a good SSD from OCZ. Lightroom catalog and previews live in another SSD with good write/read speed. Photos are stored on a 4TB HDD.
This is not a new PC, it was built by a retailer according to my specs more than one year ago.

Lightroom is pretty fast, I cannot complain at all, I barely notice processing times.
In fact, everything is pretty fast. I forgot what it meant to have a slow PC.

Quote from: Snufkin on October 31, 2013, 21:36
I've got i7-3770 3,4 GHz with 32 GB RAM.
Win 7 64-bit installed on a good SSD from OCZ. Lightroom catalog and previews live in another SSD with good write/read speed. Photos are stored on a 4TB HDD.
This is not a new PC, it was built by a retailer according to my specs more than one year ago.

Lightroom is pretty fast, I cannot complain at all, I barely notice processing times.
In fact, everything is pretty fast. I forgot what it meant to have a slow PC.

32 GB ram. Isn't that a bit overkill ?

Quote from: Herg on November 01, 2013, 08:23

32 GB ram. Isn't that a bit overkill ?

I don't think so.
I didn't think along these lines but rather "Will it be fast enough for the next 4-5 years or should I get a mainboard supporting 64 GB RAM?". Now I'd say 32 GB RAM + i7 + SSD is "fast enough for me".
I simply don't have any performance-related issues and the PC can do many things at once.

Quote from: Herg on October 31, 2013, 11:26
And while I am on the subject, why when you want to erase some marks with either the brush or the clone does the mark still show despite all your efforts ?

Just ran into this myself with LR 5.2 with an image that was retouched in 5.0. I had to go back into the corrections and decrease the feather radius. Go figure.

No slow:

LR 5.3
Catalogues with up to 43.100 images

System   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Hersteller TOSHIBA
  Modell QOSMIO X870
  Prozessor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3610QM CPU @ 2.30GHz 
  Gesamter Systemspeicher 16,0 GB RAM
  Systemtyp 64 Bit-Betriebssystem
  Anzahl der Prozessorkerne 4

Speicher   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Datenträgerpartition (C:) 250 GB SSD
  Datenträgerpartition (D:) 1 TB

Grafik   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Grafikkartentyp NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
  Insgesamt verfügbarer Grafikspeicher 10985 MB

First off with windows 7 or 8 there is no overkill with system the more the better! 32gb is fine heck I have 64 gb myself. The video card is where you will gain the biggest on your photo editing applications  I prefer nvidia cards and don't like on board cards that come with the main boards.

Quote from: Goofy on December 25, 2013, 10:03
First off with windows 7 or 8 there is no overkill with system the more the better! 32gb is fine heck I have 64 gb myself. The video card is where you will gain the biggest on your photo editing applications  I prefer nvidia cards and don't like on board cards that come with the main boards.

yep, video cards nowadays 'outpower'  CPUs by several magnitudes, so if the software can use it you will see great improvements. If you buy something like an nvidia titan/fermi, you basicaly have a smaller supercomputer inside your computer.

I notice hard disk space is critical too, as when u edit, all temporary files which can be a few g or more?

Only use hard drive as last resort. First GPU which is your graphics card than system memory and than hard drive. Also use a ssd drive which is solid state drive instead of the traditional platter disk drives.

This is not a new complaint when the subject of Lightroom comes up. I have been using it since 1.0 was released and it has slowed as they have added features but it seems to be more of a problem on PC's running Windows 7 or above. I am going to Mac in a few weeks and am hoping that Lightroom will run better on it (I am told it will be much better). Some days mine gets so bad that I have to shut down the computer and restart to clear out all the memory that is clogged with LR functions.

It is what it is I guess. Great software that runs slow or okay software that runs faster. Ah the choices.....

Quote from: SLStudios on April 04, 2014, 18:24
This is not a new complaint when the subject of Lightroom comes up. I have been using it since 1.0 was released and it has slowed as they have added features but it seems to be more of a problem on PC's running Windows 7 or above. I am going to Mac in a few weeks and am hoping that Lightroom will run better on it (I am told it will be much better). Some days mine gets so bad that I have to shut down the computer and restart to clear out all the memory that is clogged with LR functions.

It is what it is I guess. Great software that runs slow or okay software that runs faster. Ah the choices.....

All is moot point now since you will be getting an Apple soon 

Quote from: Goofy on April 04, 2014, 19:16


All is moot point now since you will be getting an Apple soon 

A valid point indeed.

the problem is systemic and not limited to LR4/5.

today's mainstream trends on software engineering are all pushing towards virtualization, OS-agnostic apps, and meta-compiled languages like Java or C#.

result : it's all good and well but the performance sucks big time compared to C/C++.

as far as i know all Adobe products are coded in C++ and Objective C and yet they can be slow as a dog in some situations where horsepower is needed, there's no real solution at the moment apart adding more ram and/or using 4 cpus, after all these algorithms were designed years ago when 12 megapixel images were considered "big".

it can only get worse as C++ is more and more seen as a thing of the past by the many computer scientists.

and the irony is that performance has nothing to do with languages, it's the compiler that makes or break the final binary application but surprisingly i'm reading crazy things about compilers recently as if they were a relic of the past century and some fools are even predicting the future is all about Javascript running in some exotic virtual machine.

I'm running LR 5 on a two year old iMac with 8 GB RAM a 3.4GHz Intel Core i7 and a AMD Radeon HD 6970M 1024 MB Graphic card - I usually have firefox and safari open, plus photoshop and sometimes other programs and can use the brush tool and all the Nik filters in LR and it is fast. I think the SSD makes all the difference here. I have all my apps on the built in SSD and some photos on my built in 1 Terabyte hard drive, but have lately been running it with most of the images I'm processing on a 4 TB LaCie drive with thunderbolt. I was going to add more RAM but I found that if I keep the hard drives with at least 25% free space the system is superfast. I maybe close it down once a week and reboot, more often if it seems to be slowing down.

I hadn't upgraded since LR2 - didn't love the program - but now I do so much of my processing right in LR5 and I love it - I have over 30,000 photos in the main catalog which is on a LaCie 4TB drive with a thunderbolt connection, and I'm gradually organizing it so all of my photos will be on the one drive, with backups elsewhere of course. I read all the info about how to set up the catalog - what to put on which disk, etc, when I got my latest iMac and have to say the solid state drive was well worth the price. It is a joy to work with.

I was concerned about having the photos on an external drive as I work on them, but the thunderbolt connection is superfast and I see no difference between those photos and the ones on a smaller catalog on the built in 1 TB drive.

Since I have digital photos going back as far as 2006, I got the 4 TB drive so I could eventually have everything in one large catalog, since the 1 TB built in drive got filled up very quickly. I back it up to a RAID system and also back up different portions to various portable hard drives and to my Photoshelter site, where I have 1 TB of cloud storage. Of course, with LR you can have the catalog spread across various drives and it will locate them, but I like keeping my catalog and photos all together so I know that drive has the most recent copies of everything.

Right now I'm organizing photos for a calendar company that has hundreds of titles, so having all my photos accessible in one place makes it much easier to review and pull out potential submissions and put them into a temporary collection.

Anyway, read up on what you should have where in terms of apps, photos, scratch disks, etc, and be sure to keep enough free space on your hard drives, and you shouldn't have a problem. Good luck!