MicrostockGroup Sponsors

A Single $82.92 Sale on SS - Is It a Mistake?

Started by Carl, March 13, 2014, 17:18

Previous topic - Next topic

panicAttack

Quote from: pancaketom on March 18, 2014, 14:22

SS if you are reading, allow sensitive use opt-out based on model releases or per image or something similar.

totally agree with that!

jsfoto

Quote from: panicAttack on March 18, 2014, 14:42
Quote from: pancaketom on March 18, 2014, 14:22

SS if you are reading, allow sensitive use opt-out based on model releases or per image or something similar.

totally agree with that!

I also agree ... I really would like to allow sensitive use for my images without models ... and those with models but without visible face.

nicku

Quote from: pancaketom on March 18, 2014, 14:22
As I understand it, the "sensitive use" is more than just sensitive use, but is mainly the large $ SOD sales. I am opted out because of a few kid and other people pics (Why SS doesn't allow opt out on a model or even per image basis is beyond me). They have requested I allow it for a few images (turn on for the whole port 'til it is dled). which I have done I think 3 times. One resulted in a big sale. All were for images that had nothing to do with sensitive uses. I still get SOD sales w/o opting in, but they tend to be single digit or low double digit sales.

I probably should just deactivate those images that I don't agree to "sensitive" use for and then turn on my port.

SS if you are reading, allow sensitive use opt-out based on model releases or per image or something similar.

Totally agree.... I'm opted OUT because of some baby and mother and baby images. Hope somebody from SS will read this ( and i know they do) and do something.

Ron

I think you would get a response if you opened a dedicated thread about it.